http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
안영훈,하동현 재단법인 경기연구원 2014 GRI 연구논총 Vol.16 No.1
In Korea, the new regional development policies on decentralization, regional cooperation andcompetition have been established and exerted since the 2000s. Especially, in the field of regional development,as a main control tower, the Korean Presidential Committee on Regional Development(PCRD) has been promoting three spatial regional policies (Daily Happy Living Community in incumbent Park’s Administration and Daily Living Sphere, Economic Region, and Supra-economicRegion in previous Lee’s Administration) to address conflictual urban issues and, at the same time, to maximize regional growth potential in metropolitan areas. Meanwhile, in Japan, these issues areseemingly being conducted by the strongly institutionalized governance systems at the metropolitan and regional level, quite different from Korea’s state-steering regional governance system. As a result, we can draw some conclusions that the cooperative governance structures of Koreaand Japan depend obviously on the peculiar politico-social and economic conditions and problems in the metropolitan areas concerned where the collaborative governance and leadership can take diversvariations on a continuum from weakly to strongly institutionalized solutions. From the analysis,finally, we can picture some different governance solutions according to different metropolitanand regional policies between Japan and Korea cases.