http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
안민석 空軍士官學校 1995 論文集 Vol.36 No.-
The development of "a sport sociology that matters" requires sport sociologists to confront and make fundamental decisions about challenges that implicitly or explicitly can be found in recent work in the field. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to introduce the recent trend of Sport Sociology in the North America. The paper focuses on methodology, theory, and recent research. While the author indicates the increased rate of qualitative approach in research methodology. I outline three of the major theoretical frameworks used in this field. These frameworks include structural functionalism, conflict theory, and critical theory. Specifically, the author tries to distinguish critical theory from structural functionalism and conflict theory. Critical theory such as Cultural Studies and Hegemony theory focuses attention on the way people create sport as an expression of their interests, resources, and relationships. It usually leads to the conclusion that sport is both a part of the social world and a mechanism for changing that world.
헤게모니 : 스포츠를 설명하는 새로운 담론 New Discourse for Sport
안민석 중앙대학교 스포츠과학연구소 2001 體育硏究 Vol.- No.14
The purpose of this paper was to examine hegemony theory as an alternative theory for Korean sport study. Hegemony theory has revealed theoretical explanations pertaining to the relationship between culture and social relations and the relationship between domination and subordination within culture. This approach viewed culture as a totality and emphasized contextual and evaluative nature of sociological analysis. The focus was on the relationship between history, the personal milieu. and social structure. Although the literature has demonstrated that the approach described has not given the cultural formation of sport high priority, considerable discussion was devoted to literature applying hegemony theory to sport. The paper indicated that sport is a form of social practice that does not exist in isolation or separation from real life. From this perspective, sport is examined from a historical approach with antecedents or past considered along with the dominant sporting values and practices as well as with dominant social groups in mind. Specifically, the paper described some contributions that hegemony theory can make towards sport study. In conclusion, the paper proposed hegemony theory for analyzing sport in context of political economy, history, and theories of class, hegemony theory, however, demands the some criticism, argument and appreciation to apply to Korean sport. Then, the approach may contribute to make the case for alternative way of relating cultural practice to the sport sciences.