運搬船의 最適設計

朴容喆,金聖翼,韓淳興 한국해사문제연구소 1980 (月刊)海洋韓國 Vol.79 No.-

도통진경에 대한 이해

박용철 대진대학교 대순사상학술원 1998 대순사상논총 Vol.5 No.-

도시수변공간의 지속가능한 생태복원 기반 개발에 관한 연구 : 한강 르네상스 프로젝트를 중심으로

박용철,김주연,윤혜정 한국공간디자인학회 2008 한국공간디자인학회논문집 Vol.3 No.3

한강과 그 수변공간은 서울이 가지고 있는 마지막으로 개발가능한 대규모 환경생태 공간이다. 최근 서울시에는 2007년부터 2030년까지 회복과 창조라는 원칙에 따라 한강 르네상스 프로젝트가 진행되고 있다. 이 계획에 따르면 워터프런트 타운 조성과 세계 초일류 항구도시의 비젼을 제시하고 있지만 몇 가지 보완할 점을 안고 있다. 첫째, 수변생태계의 복원을 위한 마스터플렌의 미비. 둘째, 수변생태환경과 수변 편의 공간과의 유기적 관계 정립 미비. 셋째, 수변 생태 공간 보존을 위한 지속 가능한 관리 시스템 미비. 넷째, 자원의 효율적 이용과 크린에너지 이용 및 청정구역 조성 방안 미비. 다섯째, 새로운 개념의 친수공간 부족과 장식 및 조경 위주의 개발. 이상의 문제점을 보완하여 자칫 도시 경쟁력이나 경제적 부가가치 위주의 전시성, 개발 사업이 되지 않도록 신중을 기해야한다. Han River and the waterfront of the river is the last ecological environment that can be under development in Seoul. Recently, the government of Seoul City has made progress the “Han River Renaissance Project” from 2007 to 2030 that is based on a principle of recovery and creation. According to the project, it has a vision of promoting the waterfront town and making the best port city worldwide, but the project still has some complementary issues. First, the master plan of recovering the ecological environment of Han Riveris insufficient. Second, the project also needs to stand side-by-side in organic relationship of the ecological environment of Han River and the waterfront convenient spaces. Third, a management system to preserve the ecological environment of the waterfront is missing, Forth, a plan for efficient usage of resources and the development of immaculate zone needs to be formulated. Fifth, the new concept of lacking water- friendly space and landscape- oriented development is needed. These five issues need to be complemented so that the “Han River Renaissance Project” does not end only focusing on neither improving the city competitiveness nor economic value- added oriented development.

營養療法의 歷史 및 營養狀態 測定法

박용철 大韓交通醫學會 1985 大韓交通醫學會誌 Vol.11 No.2

임의제출물 제도의 개선방안-휴대전화1)를 중심으로

박용철 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2022 홍익법학 Vol.23 No.1

The discusion of voluntary submision of mobile phones contains many isues. Firstof al, the time when mobile phones are voluntarily submited to the investigation agencycan be generaly divided into two cases. First, a person who “has a god reason tosuspect that he has commited or is about to commit a crime” as in Article 3, Paragraph1, Item 1 of the Act on the Execution of Police Oficer Duties, or who is “recognizedas knowing the facts of a criminal act” in Paragraph 2 of the same Article. It is an actthat acompanies an unintentional inspection of a mobile phone, and it is a case wherea mobile phone is voluntarily submited during stop and search. In this case, sinceParagraph 3 of the same Article only stipulates the investigation of whether a policeoficer poseses a weapon or not, it is true that there is a dispute over the legality ofinspecting belongings other than weapons. The voluntary submision of personalbelongings can be recognized as legal, and it is unclear whether the subject of stop &search wil be able to admit that he or she voluntarily submited a mobile phone. Second,it is a case where a mobile phone is voluntarily submited before or after the time ofdetaining a person as the subject of compulsory investigation such as arest or detention. In this case, whether it is logicaly posible for the subject of compulsory dispositon tosubmit a mobile phone voluntarily to an investigation agency is in question, and in thecase of arest or detention, the investigation agency must comply with the provisions ofArticles 216 and 217 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is posible to seize and searchwithout a warant, but even though it is required that an ex-post warant be isued, thequestion is whether it can be recognized as an object submited voluntarily under Article218 of the same Act and can be seized without a warrant. 휴대전화의 임의제출과 관련해서는 최근 쏟아지는 연구와 판례를 통해서 이를 새롭게정립할 필요성이 대두되고 있다. 하지만 그러한 넘치는 사회적 관심에도 불구하고 이에 대한 근본적 질문 즉, 휴대전화라는 정보저장매체를 유체물과 동일하게 취급해야 하는가 아니면 취급에 차이를 두어야 하는가에 대한 고민과 임의제출 제도의 의의에 대한 고민, 그리고 비교법적 연구를 통해서 외국의 제도와의 차이에 대한 연구에 있어서는 비록 필자의졸고보다 더 심화된 내용을 갖고 있다 하더라도 다수의 선행연구 및 판례를 보았을 때 다소 정리되지 않은 상태임을 발견하였다. 결국 휴대전화의 임의제출에 대한 논의는 현행법의 해석을 넘어서는 다양한 지점들이있기에 입법을 통해 해결하는 것이 가장 바람직할 것이지만, 한편 입법과정에서 과연 법원이 판례를 통하여 한 고민들이 제대로 반영될 수 있을지는 다소 회의적이다. 또한 휴대전화라는 범죄 증거의 보고를 두고 어디까지 수사기관의 접근을 제한하는 것이 바람직한가라는 고민도 하지 않을 수 없다. 이에 필자는 임의제출물에서 무관 증거를 발견한 경우에 이의 증거능력을 사후 영장 없이 인정한다는 것이 적정하지 않기는 하나 임의제출된 디지털증거 탐색 또는 수색과정에서 무관증거를 발견하게 된 경우 사후 영장만 발부받는다면 적법성을 인정하게 된다면 이는 사실상 별건수사를 사실상 조장하는 것이 아닌가 하는 고민도 함께 갖고 있다. 최근 대법원 전원합의체 판결은 임의제출물의 압수와 관련한 기본방향을 제시한 것이며 이후 세부적인 측면에서의 판례가 확립되어야 할 것으로 생각된다

Carl Schmitt의 議會制

朴龍喆 慶北大學校 師範大學 1979 敎育硏究誌 Vol.21 No.-

The Parliametary system was established in the process of obtaining that liberty and rights of people through bourgeoisie's resistance to the absolute monarchy's despotic rule. The ultimate aim of parliamentary system is to guarantee the rights of the people by means of reflecting the entire people's interests to the parliament. However, as Weber, Schmitt and Kelsen pointed out, the larger a national community becomes, the less the people come to participate in the creative activity of forming national opinion. This phenomenon is due to the facts that the parliamentary system as a historical product was essentially a spiritual principle to support bourgeoisie in modern European society and that parliament was an organ to carry out the principle. It is true that even mass democracy founded on universal suffrage does not lead to perfect realization of democracy but to the rule by mass such as a few elite capitalists, bureaucrats and military men. In a capitalistic country democracy is based on the political idea that the opinion Of the people is represented by that of the parliament. Many countries adopt the parliamentary system whose model is, historically speaking, that of England. Of course the present parliamentary systems of many countries are not necessarily the same as that of England. In this paper, I intended, mainly from the point of Carl Schmitt's Verfassun-gslehre to study the ideological basis of parliamentary system; the development of the parliamentary systems in England, France and Germany; and the actual conditions of the parliamentary system under the constitution of the Republic of Weimar.

韓·日 人文系 高等學校 敎育課程과 大學 入試制度의 比較 考察

朴龍喆,朴仁圭 경북대학교 교육대학원 1984 논문집 Vol.16 No.-

1. The curriculum of academic high schools can not help being controlled by the system of matriculation. The present matriculation system forces high-school students to foster wait-and-see policies and tricks. And so, a great number of young people in this country find pleasure in wait-and-see policies and tricks. We all fear what they see, how they feel, what they learn, and how they will live in the society after graduating. This point is the anxiety of all the people who have children. Students should be given the human nature education to teach sincerity, ingenuity, and vitality. 2. Modern nations threaten the freedom of individuals. This is caused by keeping all the social functions to nation itself. If the deep-rooted vestiges of standardization in our education since Japanese imperialism don't be removed, the democratic individual education is far off. 3. We all desire the follows; ⒜ the matriculation system which students to be able to choose the subjects according to their liking and ability. ⒝ the system which colleges themselves to be able to pick out their students and educate them according to their specific character. ⒞ the system which high schools and colleges to be able to educate students to meet the needs of real society. 4. Thinking is the distinct power of human. The thinking power of human has been able to be the modern sicence and culture. The extension of thinking powert is the most imporant indicator in educaion.

광범위 열상에 대한 수액료법

박용철 中央醫學社 1978 中央醫學 Vol.34 No.4

앗차! S結腸에 損傷을

朴容喆 藥業新聞社 1976 醫藥情報 Vol.1976 No.10

外科領域에서의 應急處置

朴容喆 대한의학협회 1975 대한의학협회지 Vol.18 No.1