조기위암 및 림프절 전이에 대한 수술 중 외과적 병기판정의 정확도 및 유용성

박은규,정오,류성엽,주재균,김동의,정미란,김호군,김회원,박영규,Park, Eun-Kyu,Jeong, Oh,Ryu, Seong-Yeop,Ju, Jae-Kyun,Kim, Dong-Yi,Jeong, Mi-Ran,Kim, Ho-Goon,Kim, Hoe-Won,Park, Young-Kyu 대한위암학회 2009 대한위암학회지 Vol.9 No.3

목적: 조기위암 및 림프절 전이에 대한 수술 중 외과적 병기판정의 정확도에 대하여 분석하고, 외과적 병기에 근거한 수술 범위 판단의 유용성에 대하여 조사하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2006년에서 2007년까지 위암으로 위 절제술을 시행 받은 369명을 대상으로 조기위암 및 림프절 전이에 대한 수술 전 검사 및 외과적 병기판정의 민감도, 특이도 및 정확도를 비교 분석하였다. 결과: 조기위암에 대한 외과적 병기판정의 민감도, 특이도, 정확도는 각각 74.5%, 95.7%, 83.7%였으며 양성 예측도는 95.7%였다. 이는 수술 전 검사에 의한 조기위암의 진단에 비하여 높은 특이도와 양성 예측도를 보였다. 림프절 전이에 대한 외과적 병기판정의 민감도, 특이도 및 정확도는 73.2%, 78.1%. 76.4%였다. 127명의 림프절 전이 환자 중 수술 전 진단에서 59명(46.5%)이, 외과적 병기판정에 의해서는 34명(26.8%)만이 림프절 전이 없음으로 저 평가되었다. 조기위암의 진단에서 술 전 진단과 외과적 병기 사이에 불일치를 보인 70예 가운데, 63예(90%)는 외과적 병기판정이, 7예(10%)는 수술 전 진단이 정확하였다. 결론: 수술 중 외과의사에 의한 외과적 병기판정은 조기 위암 및 림프절 전이에 대하여 수술 전 검사에 비하여 높은 정확도를 보이고 진행위암의 조기위암으로의 저 평가를 현저히 줄인다. 따라서 위암의 수술 시 외과적 병기는 수술 범위를 결정하는데 있어서 중요한 인자로 고려되어야 한다. Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of surgically diagnosing early gastric cancer (EGC) and lymph node metastasis, and to determine its role for performing limited surgery for EGC. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 369 patients who underwent gastrectomy for primary gastric carcinoma. The surgical diagnosis was evaluated by determining its sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, and this was compared with the preoperative examinations. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the intraoperative diagnosis for EGC were 74.5%, 95.7% and 83.7%, respectively. The predictive value for EGC according to the intraoperative diagnosis was 95.7%. The surgical diagnosis of EGC showed higher specificity and a higher predictive value than preoperative examinations, which significantly reduced the risk of underestimating advanced gastric cancer (AGC) to EGC. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for lymph node metastasis according to the surgical diagnosis were 73.2%, 78.1% and 76.4%, respectively. For 70 patients with a discrepancy in the diagnosis of EGC between the pre- and intra-operative diagnosis, the surgical diagnosis was correct in 63 (90%) patients, but the preoperative examinations were correct in only 7 (10%) patients. Conclusion: The surgical diagnosis showed better accuracy than the preoperative examinations for detecting EGC and lymph node metastasis. Our results suggest that the decision for conducting limited surgery based on the surgical diagnosis might reduce the risk of under-treatment of AGC to EGC better than the preoperative examinations.

위식도접합부선암의 임상병리학적 특성

김한수,정오,박영규,김동의,류성엽,김영진,Kim, Han-Su,Jeong, Oh,Park, Young-Kyu,Kim, Dong-Yi,Ryu, Seong-Yeop,Kim, Young-Jin 대한위암학회 2008 대한위암학회지 Vol.8 No.4

목적: 위식도접합부선암의 임상병리학적 특성은 서구와 아시아 간의 많은 차이를 보인다고 알려져 있다. 그러나, 한국의 경우 위식도접합부선암의 유병율이 매우 낮고 이에 대한 연구 또한 부족하다. 따라서 저자들은 우식도접합부선암의 Siewert 분류에 따른 임상병리학적 특성을 조사하여 서구와 다른 국내 위식도접합부선암의 특성을 연구하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2004년 5월부터 2008년 2월까지 본원에서 위암으로 수술을 시행 받은 환자들을 대상으로 수술소견 및 병리 사진을 토대로 Siewert 분류법에 따라 위식도접합부선암을 분류하고, 의무기록을 바탕으로 환자들의 임상병리학적 특성들을 조사하였다. 결과: 위식도접합부선암은 전체 1,778예 중 70예(3.9%)였다. Siewert 1형은 3예(4.3%)로 매우 드물었으며, 2형과 3형이 각각 30예(42.8%) 37예(52.8%)였다. 2형이 3형에 비하여 평균연령이 높았으나(64세 vs 59세, P=0.049), 남녀비에는 차이가 없었다. 2형과 3형간에 Barrett 식도의 발현 정도나 Lauren 분류의 차이는 없었으나, 저분화암의 빈도는 3형에서 유의하게 높았다(P=0.045). 68예(97.1%)에서 근치적 절제가 시행되었으며, 각 아형간에 TNM 병기의 차이는 없었다. 결론: 국내의 위식도접합부선암은 매우 드물며 특히 1형의 유병율이 매우 낮다. 본 연구에서 서구의 보고와 부분적으로 일치하지 않는 병리학적 특성을 보였다. 향후 보다 많은 환자들을 대상으로 한국인의 위식도접합부선암의 특성을 연구할 필요가 있다. Purpose: Siewert's classification of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been widely adopted, but there is a wide discrepancy of the clinicopathological features of AEG of the Asian patients as compared to that of the Western patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of AEG according to the Siewert classification. Materials and Methods: Among the patients who underwent surgery for gastric carcinoma in our institution between May 2004 and February 2008, the AEG patients were selected based on their operation records and the photographs according to Siewert's classification. Results: There were 70 AEG patients (3.9%) among the total of 1,778 patients. There were 3 patients (4.3%) with type I, 30 patients (42.8%) with type II and 37 patients (52.8%) with type III. Curative resection (R0) was achieved in 68 cases (97.1%). No significant differences in gender, stage, Barrett's esophagus and the proximal margin were found between the patients with type II and type III AEG. The patients with type III were younger than the patients with type II (59 vs 64 years, respectively, P=0.049). Well differentiated histology (P=0.045) and the intestinal type (P=0.055) were significantly more frequent in the patients with type II as compared with that in the patients with type III. Conclusion: There was a striking difference of the Asian patients from the Western patients for the incidence of AEG (and especially type I). Some of the differences between type II and type III patients were similar to those of the previous Western studies. A large study is needed to investigate whether these features are typical in the Korean population.

복부외상환자의 예후에 영향을 미치는 인자들에 대한 분석

김희준 ( Hee Joon Kim ),김형수 ( Hyung Soo Kim ),서경원 ( Kyung Won Seo ),주재균 ( Jae Kyun Ju ),류성엽 ( Seong Yeop Ryu ),김정철 ( Jeong Cheol Kim ),김형록 ( Hyung Rok Kim ),박영규 ( Young Kyu Park ),김동의 ( Dong Yi Kim ),김영진 대한외상학회 2007 大韓外傷學會誌 Vol.20 No.1

Purpose: Recently, trauma is more frequent due to the increases in the population, the number of traffic accident, and the incidence of violence. Especially, abdominal trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. We analyzed the clinical features and the factors associated with morbidity and mortality. Methods: We analyzed 136 patients of abdominal trauma who were admitted at the Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, from January 2003 to June 2005. We analyzed the cause of trauma, the injured organ, combined injuries, mental status, blood pressure, laboratory findings, morbidity, and mortality. The relationships between by variable were assesed by using the independent samples test and the Kruskal?Wallis test. Results: The causes of trauma were traffic accidents (98 cases, 72%), falling accidents (9 cases, 6.6%), violence (6 cases, 4.4%), and stab injuries (6 cases, 4.4%). The injured organs were the small intestines (47 cases, 34.6%), the liver (35 cases, 25.7%), the spleen (26 cases, 19.1%), the mesentery (17 cases, 12.5%), the large intestines (15 cases, 11.0%), the pancreas (14 cases, 10.3%), etc. The most common combined injury was chest injury (53 cases, 39%). Comatose or semicomatose mental status and shock on admission (<60 mmHg in systolic) were related to high mortality (85.7%). In laboratory findings, decreased hemoglobin (<8 g/dL), and platelet count (<50,000/mm3), and increased creatinine level (>1.6 mg/dL) were significant prognostic factors. The incidence of postoperative complications was 40.4%, and frequent complications were wound infection (8.1%) and re-bleeding (8.1%). The overall mortality rate was 18.4%, and most common cause was hypovolemic shock (18 cases, 13.2%), however, there was no statistical difference according to injurd organ. Conclusion: In the multivariate analysis, mental status, hemoglobin, and serum creatinine level were the most significant prognostic factors. When an abdominal trauma patient arrives at the emergency room, a rapid and accurate evaluation of the patient`s status and risk factors, and resuscitation, if necessary, have to be performed to lower the morbidity and mortality. (J Korean Soc Traumatol 2007;20:12-18)