음악이론으로의 역사적 접근: 연구사례를 통해 살펴본 음악이론사 연구의 본질과 현 상황

김연 낭만음악사 2005 낭만음악 Vol.17 No.2

죄와은혜의세력

김연 신학지남사 1924 신학지남 Vol.6 No.3

憂鬱症의 歸因 模型에 관한 硏究

金延 인제대학교 1985 仁濟醫學 Vol.6 No.3

憂鬱症의 歸因 模型을 檢證하기 위해 憂鬱症, 經憂鬱症, 正常 등 세 집단을 對象으로 하여 歸因 形態를 측정한 결과 憂鬱症 患者는 우울하지 않은 사람들보다 否定的 事件(朱敗)에 대해서 內的 歸因, 統制 不可能한 歸因, 持續的 歸因함을 확인했다. This study has attempted to prove attributional model of depression which was proposed as an alternative model of Beck's cognitive triad and Seligman's learned helplessness model of depression. It was hypothesized that, in the attributional model of depression, depressives compaired to nondepressives attribute negative life events (failure) to internal, uncontrollable, stable and global causes. Ninety six subjects, 46 males and 50 females participated in the experimental research. Their mean age was 21, and education 12 years. The subjects were classified as severe depression, mild depression, and nondepression according to the scores of Beck Depression Inventory as a subjective symptom criteria. Experimental design was 3(depression) x2 (reinforcement) x2 (suggestion) factorial design, and the dependent variables were the subjects' attribution of, and anagram performance after, the negative outcome experiences. The subjects were randomly assigned to 12 cells and treated on the experimental sitution which involved a discrimination problem task whcih is either soluble (100% reinforcement) or insoluble (20% reinforcement), thus providing success and failure outcome experiences. And then a suggestion was said that other people among his/her ages could solve either successfully or unsuccessfully the discrimination problem tasks. Next the subjects were handed an attributional rating scale in which they were supposed to check the degree of internality, controllability, stability and globality of attributional causes of success and failure outcome experiences. And then anagram task was ensued. The result largely upheld the attributional model of depression. Severe depressives compaired to mild depressives, and mild depressives, and mild depressives compaired to nondepressives attribute failure to internal, uncontrollable, and stable causes and attribute success to controllable and unstable causes. Accordingly depressives percepted the causes of negative life events as responsible, less controllable, and persistent, which supported the attributional model of depression. The learned helplessness model of depression was also supported by showing that, the more depressed, the more performance deficit in anagram solution tasks after success and failure outcome experiences, was revealed and the per son who experienced failure outcome manifested more lowered performance that those who experienced success outcome. The suggestion of success and failure(of other) was not effective on the attributional behavior of outcome experiences and it was discussed in light of the relationship between the attribution and the use of consensus information. Global dimension which was rejected in this research was also discussed in light of the characteristic of experimental situation and diagnostic categories of the depresed subjects. Three fouth of the attributional model of depression was supported in which depressives characteristically attribute negative outcomes to internal, uncontrollable, stable causes, accordingly Beck's cognitive model of depression also supported.

영미법상의 Injunction 소송절차 소고

김연 경성대학교 법학연구소 1993 경성법학 Vol.2 No.-

올바른 검체 채취 및 취급과 검사 업무 효율성 증대 방안

김연 한국의료QA학회 2009 가을학술대회 Vol.2009 No.3

Weiner의 Schizohrenic Sign에 관한 연구 : Rorschach검사 중심으로

김연 인제대학교 1980 仁濟醫學 Vol.1 No.1

Rorschach 검사반응에 있어서 Weiner가 주장하는 정신분열증의 세가지 기호들을 검토했다. 대상은 1979年중 본 병원에 입원했던 200명의 환자로서, 종합검사(Full-Battery)를 통해서 정신분열증, 정신신경증, 인격장애로 최종진단된 세집단으로 이들의 자료처리결과 부정적인 결과를 얻었다. Weiner's Signs are studied as a means of discrimination of schizophrenia from nonpsychotic psychiatric patients. 200 patients tested were schizophrenic, neurotic, and personality disorder, and these final diagnoses were independently determined according to Full Battery. Results approach, however, do not achieve significance.

2010년대의 미 육군

김연,Kim, Yeon 한국방위산업진흥회 1988 國防과 技術 Vol.- No.117

한국 가사소송법의 법체계적 지위

김연 한국민사소송법학회 2010 민사소송 Vol.14 No.2

The Korean Code of Domestic Litigation, which has taken effect in the year of 1991, is different from the similar codes of other countries in Asia. It is the unique code which has almost of all provisions of domestic litigations and non-litigation cases in Korea. In other words, all of the cases of the Family Court are regulated by the Code and anyone cannot file domestic cases with the district court. Some one says that it could be a model to other countries. But after the history of 20 years of the Code, there are several discussions pointing the legal status of the Code: i.e. relation between the Code and the Civil Code of Korea; relation between the Code an the Civil Procedures Code of Korea. In Korea, more than one hundred thousands of domestic cases are filed one year, and about a half of them are litigation cases. It means, in spite of “the tendency of non-litigationalization of litigation cases,” there are a lot of litigation cases more than non-litigation cases. And there are some people arguing about the standards of distinguishing two kinds of cases and some problems from the procedural point of view. The Korean Code of Domestic Litigation, which has taken effect in the year of 1991, is different from the similar codes of other countries in Asia. It is the unique code which has almost of all provisions of domestic litigations and non-litigation cases in Korea. In other words, all of the cases of the Family Court are regulated by the Code and anyone cannot file domestic cases with the district court. Some one says that it could be a model to other countries. But after the history of 20 years of the Code, there are several discussions pointing the legal status of the Code: i.e. relation between the Code and the Civil Code of Korea; relation between the Code an the Civil Procedures Code of Korea. In Korea, more than one hundred thousands of domestic cases are filed one year, and about a half of them are litigation cases. It means, in spite of “the tendency of non-litigationalization of litigation cases,” there are a lot of litigation cases more than non-litigation cases. And there are some people arguing about the standards of distinguishing two kinds of cases and some problems from the procedural point of view.

국제조세상 기술용역 제공에 따른 사업소득과 사용료소득 과세 구분에 관한 고찰 ― 중국과 한국의 사례 비교 분석을 중심으로 ―

김연 서울시립대학교 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 2020 서울법학 Vol.27 No.4

This paper focuses on comparatively reviewing the Chinese case and the Korean cases on classifying between technical service fee and royalties. The reviewed cases are based on tax issues about mixed contract with providing technical service and licensing in the context of international taxation. In detail, we found that there is similarity in the basic facts between theses cases, which scrutinized whether problematic consideration paid is regarded as royalties or not. First of all, Chapter 2 reviews the tax standard on royalties and business income roughly, which decides whether a company has a permanent establishment in problematic geographical area or not. Especially, Chapter 2 compares related contents(Article 12) of OECD Model Tax Convention with those of UN Model Tax Convention(Article 12 and Article 12A). Chapter 3 examines the facts and circumstances of the Chinese cases and the Korean cases. These reviewed cases are divided into two parts. One part includes general tax cases related with categorization on technical service fees and royalties in China and Korea. Another part includes tax cases about classifying incomes with mixed contract of providing technical services and licensing. With respect to these similar facts and circumstances, the Chinese Court and the Korean Court offered different judicial decisions based on incompatible grounds. Specially, this paper scrutinizes closely into logical backgrounds and its tax implication provided by the Chinese and Korean Court. 기술의 고도화와 경제발전에 기술이 미치는 영향이 높아지면서 기술용역에 관한 거래나 기술 도입과 관련된 계약 역시 그 비중을 높여가고 있다. 이와 관련하여 기술을 보유하는 기업은 원천지국에서 용역 대금 또는 사용료를 수취하여 이익을 실현할 수도 있으며, 두 가지 소득 유형을 혼합하여 계약을 구성하는 경우도 있다. 이에 대해 국제조세의 법리는 사용료소득에 대하여 원천징수가 될 수 있도록 내용을 구성하는 반면, 기술용역의 대금에 대하여 원천지국에 고정사업장의 성립 여부에 의해 과세권을 인정하는 구조이다. 두 가지 소득의 유형 구분에 관하여 OECD 모델 조세협약 제12조와 UN 모델 조세협약 제12조 및 제12A조는 대립되는 부분이 있다. 이와 관련하여 각 모델 조세협약 주석서에서는 일정한 기준을 제시하고 있다. 본고에서는 해당의 세부 사항에 대해서 상세하게 살펴보았다. 본 논문에서 중국과 한국의 사례를 제시하여 국제조세상 기술용역의 대가의 소득과 사용료소득 구분 문제에 있어서 양국의 과세관청 및 사법기관의 입장에 중심을 두어 살펴보고 있다. ① 우선 외국기업에 지급된 대가가 기술용역에 따른 대가인지, 아니면 사용료소득에 해당되는 것인지에 관하여 일반적인 검토 과정을 보여주는 양국 사례(중국의 스웨덴 기업과 세무국 간의 조세분쟁 사례와 대법원 2008.1.18. 선고 2005두16475 판결)를 비교・검토하였다. 이와 같은 사례를 검토한 바, 한국은 OECD 모델 조세협약의 입장에 따라 접근한 법리를 제시한 것이며 중국은 기술 소유권의 귀속에 따라 소득 유형을 확정하고자 하는 입장이다. ② 이어서 통신위성 등 전산장비의 기능과 네트워크망 사용 등에 대하여 대가 지급이 연결되는 경우로서 사실관계가 유사한 양국의 사례(미국 PanAmSat와 베이징시 세무국 간 조세분쟁 사례와 대법원 2015. 6.24. 선고 2015두950 판결)를 비교 분석하였다. 사례를 검토한 바, 한국과 중국은 이와 같은 유사한 사실관계에 대하여 정반대의 결론을 내린 것을 알 수 있다. 중국은 UN 모델 조세협약을 확장하여 해석하는 방향을 두고, 주파수 등 무형자산의 사용을 통신위성 및 장비 등 유형자산의 사용에 포함시켜 사용료소득으로 분류하는 법리를 취하고 있다. 반면 한국은 OECD 모델 조세협약과 그에 근거한 해석에 따라 통신위성 등의 설비를 직접적으로 사용하는 것이 아니하는 논리를 제시하면서 용역의 대가를 사업소득으로 분류하고 있다는 시사점을 얻을 수 있다.

수학적 모델링의 구현을 위한 교사 교육: 사례 연구

김연 영남수학회 2020 East Asian mathematical journal Vol.36 No.2

Mathematical modeling has been emphasized because it offers important opportunities for students to both apply their learning of mathematics to a situation and to explore the mathematics involved in the context of the situation. However, unlike its importance, mathematical modeling has not been grounded in typical mathematics classes because teachers do not have enough understanding of mathematical modeling and they are skeptical to implement it in their lessons. The current study analyzed the data, such as video recordings, slides, and surveys for teachers, collected in four lessons of teacher education in terms of mathematical modeling. The study reported different kinds of tasks that are authentic with regards to mathematical modeling. Furthermore, in teacher education, teachers’ identities have separated a mode as learners and a mode as teachers and conflicts and intentional transition were observed. Analysis of the surveys shows what teachers think about mathematical modeling with their understanding of it. In teacher education, teachers achieved different kinds of modeling tasks and experience them which are helpful to enact mathematical modeling in their lessons. However, teacher education also needs to specifically offer what to do and how to do it for their lessons.