http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
강상규(Sanggyu Kang) 한국정치학회 2006 한국정치학회보 Vol.40 No.2
명성왕후와 흥선대원군의 정치적 ‘관계’를 심도 있게 파악하기 위해서는 국왕 고종의 정치사상과 리더십에 대한 새로운 이해가 불가피하다. 왜냐하면 기존의 명성왕후와 대원군의 ‘숙명’적인 적대자로서의 이미지와 ‘무능한 전제군주’ 고종의 이미지는 마치 동전의 양면처럼 하나의 세트로 형성되었기 때문이다. 따라서 본고는 다음과 같은 네 개의 부문으로 구성되어있다. 우선 우리들의 ‘기억’ 속에서 조선 왕실의 두 인물과 ‘무능한 전제군주’ 고종에 대한 이미지는 어떻게 형성되었는가(2장). 둘째, 조선의 왕권이라는 ‘구조’적인 차원에서 볼 때 두 사람의 정치적 위상의 특수성은 무엇이며 고종을 포함한 세 사람의 정치적 관계는 어떤 것이었는가(3장). 셋째, 고종은 어떤 경로를 통해 어떠한 정치의식과 대외관을 가지게 되는가(4장). 마지막으로 임오군란에 이르기까지의 구체적인 현실정치의 ‘과정’ 속에서 세 인물의 정치적 관계는 어떻게 전개되었는가(5장). 본고에서는 위의 질문들에 대한 답을 추적하는 방식으로 19세기 거대한 전환기에 직면한 조선왕실 내부의 정치적 관계에 접근하고자 했다. In order to reconsider the political relations between Queen Min and Daewongun, first of all we should understand King Kojong's political thought and leadership. Because the existing image of Queen Min and Daewongun as a fatal cat-and-dog antagonist and that of King Kojong as "an incompetent absolute monarch" have been formed simultaneously just like both sides of coin. This article consists of four parts as follows: firstly, how in our "memory" the existing image of them have been formed(chap.2), secondly, what on earth the uniqueness of political power of Queen Min and Daewongun is from the standpoint of the political "structure" inside of royal family(chap.3), thirdly, through what channel, what kind of political thought and foreign relations views came to being in the mind of King Koiong(chap.4). fourthly, through He "process" of real politics, how the political relations between this three persons developed specifically(chap.5). By searching for an answer to the above four questions, this article tries to reveal the political power relations in royal family during the period of "great transformation" in the late 19th century Korea.
어문학부(語文學部) : 동아시아 문명권에서 "주권"과 "국제" 개념의 탄생 -『만국공법』의 판본 비교와 번역
강상규 ( Sang Gyu Kang ) 한국중국학회 2010 中國學報 Vol.62 No.-
In our daily life in the sovereign nation, we are faced with international and global phenomena. These expressions, ``sovereign state`` and ``international relations`` are so much familiar to us; however, they became used in the East Asian Hanja (Chinese character) culture not too long ago. ``When`` were these terms introduced into the East Asian Hanja culture, and ``what process`` did they undergo to get established? What does it politically entail that the phenomena, which are called by these terms, become universal? This paper addresses these questions. For the purpose of the discussion, this paper initially examines the account and significance of such concepts as ``sovereignty`` and ``international`` that emerged in Europe. Then it looked into how such new notions were translated, disseminated, and accepted into the Hanja culture in the 19th century, when the ``West moves to dominate the East.`` It was the books of Mangukgongbeop, which correspond to the international law of today that played a matrical role to the birth of new political concepts in the great transformation of the 19th century. In this light, the paper investigated the various editions of Mangukgongbeop of those days. Based on this research, the analysis of historical context and meaning is presented with regard to the fact that a ``sovereign nation`` has appeared in the East Asian culture as a new concept for country, and the relationship ``among`` countries has changed into the ``international`` relationship which connotes independent and mutually parallel relations.