http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김한초 세계평화교수협의회 1985 아카데미論叢 Vol.13 No.1
대한민국의 국가이상이 主權在民의 민주주의에 있었지만 행정실무를 결정하는 대부분의 條例는 식민통치시대의 그것에 따르지 않을 수 없었고, 행정실무를 담당하는 고급관료와 하급관리 역시 식민통치 하에서 관리생활을 하던 사람들의 행정실무기능을 그대로 이용했기 때문에 식민지 통치제제가 심어 놓은 분열적 통치행태가 신생 공화국의 국가관료제에 그대로 답습되었던 것이다. 그러나 다른 한편 大義名分만은 어느 경우에도 主權在民의 민주주의였기 때문에 국가관료제 역시 내세우는 명분은 민주주의일 수밖에 없지만 그 실상은 식민통치시대의 방식과 사고에서 벗어나지 못하는 자가당착에 빠진 것이 우리나라 국가관료제의 실제 모습이었던 것이다. 이것을 해방 이후의 역사과정으로 고찰하고자 할 때 우리는 해방 직후의 美軍政 3년과 제 1 공화국, 4·19혁명 직후의 과도정부, 제 3 공화국 그리고 오늘의 제 5공화국 시대의 국가관료제의 변천과정을 주목하게 된다. In order to avoid wheel slippage or mechanical damage during the mobile robot navigation, it is necessary to smoothly change driving velocity or direction of the mobile robot. This means that dynamic constraints of the mobile robot should be considered in the design of path tracking algorithm. In the study, a path tracking problem is formulated as following a virtual target vehicle which is assumed to move exactly along the path with specified velocity. The driving velocity control law is designed basing on bang-bang control considering the acceleration bounds of driving wheels. The steering control law is designed by combining the bang-bang control with an intermediate path called the landing curve which guides the robot to smoothly land on the virtual target's tangential line. The curvature and convergence analyses provide sufficient stability conditions for the proposed path tracking controller. A series of path tracking simulations and experiments conducted for a two-wheel driven mobile robot show the validity of the proposed algorithm.
金漢超 釜山大學校 學生生活硏究所 1979 硏究報 Vol.15 No.1
This report employed the data which were collected by the research Institute for the Unification in the Busan National University in 1978. For the report twelve items among the questionnaire were sellected in order to the comparative analysis between Seoul and Busan college students. According the χ²-test, it shows that only two items among twelve items have not any meaningfull differences of the attitudes between Seoul and Busan college students. Therefor It could interpreted that the students of the two areas have shown different attitudes in many fields. The differences in the attitudes of the students of the two areas could be summarized as fsollows. A) Personal life aspects 1) The interest to the daily news is more polarized in Seoul students than in Busan. 2) The score of mother preference is more high in Seoul students than Busan. 3) Busan Students depend personal expencies more on their parents than Seoul Students. According to the above tendencies, it could be said that Seoul college students have shown more positive in their personal life than Busan college students. B) Status orientation 1) Busan college students have more preference to the power oriented occupations as high class administrator, enterpriser, and judicial officer, than Seoul college students. 2) Seoul college students have more preference to the professional occupations as medical doctor and college professor, than Busan colledge students. The above differential of the two areas could be interpreted as follow: The Busan college students show more power oriented tendencies than the Seoul college students. C) Attitude to college 1) The degree of satisfaction to the specialty in college is more high in the Seoul college student group than in the Busan group. 2) To choose the deficiencies of the professors, the Busan students indicate the internal aspects of the professors, but the Seoul students indicate the external aspects of the professors. Generally speaking, according to the above mention, the students of the two areas, Busan and Seoul, show the difference tendencies in many aspects. It could be interpreted that the difference are originated from the different background of the two areas.