http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
국내 판매중인 여성청결제의 사용실태 및 함유 보존제 분석
김완서(Wanseo Kim),윤영인(Youngin Youn),이고운(Gowoon Lee),박나연(Na-Youn Park),고영림(Younglim Kho),최경호(Kyungho Choi) 한국환경보건학회 2018 한국환경보건학회지 Vol.44 No.2
Objectives: Preservatives, suspected to be endocrine disrupting chemicals, are widely used in feminine hygiene products for the prevention of deterioration. Information regarding the usage patterns of feminine hygiene products and the concentrations of preservatives in these products is limited. The present study was conducted to investigate the use of feminine cleansers among Korean women and quantify the concentration of preservatives in feminine cleansers. Methods: Approximately 500 women were recruited from the city of Busan in August 2017 and a questionnaire survey was conducted on the use of feminine cleansers. Several major feminine hygiene products (n=69) were identified and selected for analysis of 22 preservatives. Following appropriate preparation, the products were analyzed by HPLC/DAD. Results: Over 70% of the participating women used at least one feminine cleanser. Marital status and parity were associated with the frequency of use. Liquid was most frequently used form of feminine cleanser (66.6%). The greatest proportion of subjects answered that they use it ‘one to two times per week’ (36.5%). Among the 69 feminine cleansers, benzoic acid, sorbic acid, phenoxyethanol, and methyl paraben were detected at 144-4,428 μg/g, 195-1,470 μg/g, 269-4,237 μg/g, and 625-4,901 μg/g, respectively. BA was the most frequently detected (46.4%). Conclusions: In the present study, the characteristics of feminine cleanser use among Korean women were investigated. Based on an analysis of preservatives in the feminine hygiene products, one product was determined to exceed the maximum authorized concentration of MeP (0.4%). Our results will help refine exposure and risk assessment for toxic chemicals in feminine cleansers.
Docosahexaenoic acid sensitizes colon cancer cells to sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis.
Lim, Soo-Jeong,Lee, Eunmyong,Lee, Eun-Hye,Kim, Soo-Yeon,Cha, Jun Hyung,Choi, Hwanho,Park, Wanseo,Choi, Hyeon Kyeom,Ko, Seong-Hee,Kim, So Hee National Hellenic Research Foundation 2012 Oncology reports Vol.27 No.6
<P>Sulindac analogs represent one of the most efficacious groups of NSAIDs reducing the risk of colon cancer. Recent studies have shown that sulindac sulfide, a sulindac analog effective at lower doses compared to its parent compound, triggers the death receptor (DR)5-dependent extrinsic apoptotic pathway. Induction of apoptosis via activation of the DR-mediated pathway would be an ideal therapeutic strategy to eliminate cancer cells. In this study, we investigated the possibility that colon cancer cells are sensitized to sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis by docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), via activation of the DR/extrinsic apoptotic pathway. Our data demonstrated that DHA combination sensitized colon cancer cells to sulindac sulfide-induced apoptosis, leading to enhanced growth suppression of human colon cancer xenografts. The combination effect was primarily attributed to increased cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and caspase-8 activation. Moreover, pretreatment with z-IETD-FMK (caspase-8 inhibitor) or stable expression of dominant negative caspase-8 genes blocked DHA/sulindac sulfide cotreatment-induced apoptosis. In view of the finding that DR5 silencing abrogated the combination-stimulated apoptosis, we propose that apoptotic synergy induced by sulindac sulfide plus DHA is mediated via DR5. Our findings collectively support the utility of a combination of sulindac sulfide and DHA in the effective prevention and treatment of colon cancer.</P>
LC-MS/MS를 이용한 동물 사료 내 글라이포세이트 및 글루포시네이트 분석
이지수,김완서,양희득,박나연,정웅,김정환,고영림,Lee, Ji-Su,Kim, Wanseo,Yang, Heedeuk,Park, Na-Youn,Jung, Woong,Kim, Junghoan,Kho, Younglim 대한화학회 2019 대한화학회지 Vol.63 No.5
식품에서 글라이포세이트와 글루포시네이트의 함량 기준은 구체적이며 분류가 잘 되어있다. 그러나 동물 사료나 먹이에서의 함량 기준은 비교적 구체적이지 못하며 분류가 미흡한 편이다. 또한 인간에게 미치는 위험에 대해서는 지속적인 논의는 이루어지고 있는 반면에, 동물에게 미치는 위험성은 충분한 연구가 이루어지지 않았다. 본 연구에서는 동물이 글라이포세이트를 섭취하는 경로로 추정되는 사료에서의 분석법을 확립하였다. 25% 메탄올을 이용한 용매추출, 원심분리 후 고체상추출로 정제한 후, 농축하여 LC-MS/MS를 이용하여 정량 분석하였다. 분석법 검증은 검출한계, 정확도 및 정밀도 시험을 통해 진행하였다. 확립된 시험법의 검출한계는 글루포시네이트 $1.8{\mu}g/kg$, 글라이포세이트 $2.4{\mu}g/kg$ 이었다. 정확도는 94.4~103.4%, 정밀도는 1.5~7.2%의 범위로 나타났다. 동물 사료(n=13)를 분석법을 적용시켜 분석한 결과 글루포시네이트는 한 개의 시료에서 검출되었고($ND{\sim}8.8{\mu}g/kg$), 글라이포세이트는 한 개의 시료를 제외한 모든 시료에서 검출($ND{\sim}337.0{\mu}g/kg$)되었다. The standards for the contents of glyphosate and glufosinate in foods are specific and well categorized. However, the standard of content in animal feeds is relatively inadequate and the classification is insufficient. There is also constant debate about the risk of glyphosate and glufosinate to human health, but the risk to animals has not been well studied. In this study, we established an analytical method in feeds that is estimated to be the path for animals to ingest glyphosate. The solvent extraction was carried out using 25% methanol. After centrifugation, samples were purified using solid phase extraction (SPE) and quantitatively analysed using LC-MS/MS after concentrated. Assessment of validation was conducted through detection limits, accuracy, and precision tests. The detection limits for the established method were 1.8 of ${\mu}g/kg$ of glufosinate and $2.4{\mu}g/kg$ of glyphosate. Accuracy was ranged from 94.4% to 103.4% and precision was range from 1.5% to 7.2%. Glufosinate was detected in one sample ($ND{\sim}8.8{\mu}g/kg$) and glyphosate was detected in all but one sample ($ND{\sim}337.0{\mu}g/kg$) by applying the analytical method to animal feeds (n=13).