http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
정찬권(Chan Gwon Jeong)(鄭燦權) 위기관리 이론과 실천 2013 Crisisonomy Vol.9 No.7
본 연구는 핵으로 무장한 북한의 군사적 위협은 물론 각종 재난 등에 효율적인 대응을 할 수 있도록 현행 분산ㆍ이원화된 중앙정부와 지방자치단체의 위기관리 조직운영체계의 문제점을 분석하고, 발전방안의 제시에 목적을 두고 있다. 이를 위해 문헌자료와 실증적 분석을 통해 도출된 개선방안은 첫째, 국가위기관리 총사령탑(Control tower)으로서 NSC사무처 기능복원과 업무중복ㆍ갈등을 최소화를 위해 외교안보수석실을 국가안보실로 통합해야 한다. 둘째, 안전행정부의 비상대비와 민방위 조직을 통합하여 국무총리 직속기구로 가칭 "국가비상대비ㆍ민방위처"를 창설해야 한다. 셋째, 재난 유형별로 이원적으로 운영되는 조직기능을 일원화하여 업무중복과 혼란야기방지를 위해 가칭 "재난관리청"신설도 적극 검토해야 한다. 넷째, 지자체 위기관리조직기능을 재정비하고, 그들이 일정한 자율성과 독립성을 갖고 업무수행을 하도록 지방자치법 개정 등 여건마련이 필요하다. The purpose of this study is to analyze the national crisis management system and to propose a improved organization & operation system. So, I suggest the following steps be followed. First, In order to carry out the control tower of national crisis management system, The National Security Council's secretary should to be restoration. Also the office of National Security and the office of foreign affair and national security have to integrate because of it's function overlapping and in-efficiency. Second, The organization of the civil defense, emergency preparedness and, Disaster is to reorganize as soon as possible. For example, The Agency of National Civil Defense & Preparedness, The Agency of National Disaster Management. Lastly, for more effective the crisis management system of local government is to change the unified organization & operation model and relevant laws and regulation should be revised. In conclusion, for more effective national crisis management, we need to reconstruct the related organization and operation system.
정찬일 ( Chan-yil Jung ),이동현 ( Dong-hyun Lee ),인호 ( Hoh Peter In ) 한국정보처리학회 2008 한국정보처리학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.15 No.2
정보시스템의 개발에 있어서 요구사항의 체계적인 관리가 중요시되는 가운데, 요구사항에 대한 세부적인 정보들을 계량적으로 관리하기 위한 체계적인 분류방법이 부족한 것으로 판단되어, 요구사항을 업무로직, 데이터, 기술기반 관점 및 CEO/CIO, 책임자, 설계자 시각에 따른 요구사항 분류매트릭스를 제공함으로써, 요구사항을 좀더 체계적으로 수집, 관리할 수 있는 기반을 마련하였다.
정찬모 ( Chan Mo Chung ) 안암법학회 2014 안암 법학 Vol.0 No.43
Korean Government adopted 「Guidelines on Net Neutrality and Internet Traffic Management」in December 2011 and 「Standards on Reasonable Network Management and Transparency」in December 2013. Those documents, however, raise some constitutional concerns as to the protection of fundamental rights of net operators, application service providers, and the public in general. Net operators have fundamental rights of property, freedom of doing business, equality, and freedom of expression to a limited extent. End users including application developers have fundamental rights of nondiscrimination, freedom of expression, privacy and access to the Internet. Net neutrality obligation affects those fundamental rights of net operators and end users in various ways. Fundamental rights may be constrained when they are in conflict with each other and with important public interests. Those constraints, however, must meet conditions of objective justification, suitability of means, least restrictiveness, and balance of interests. A constraining regulation must also be adopted in the form of Act or lower level of laws under the explicit authorization of an Act. In addition, a result in which a right absolutely ignores other competing rights should be avoided. Following those principles, the Guidelines should be amended to narrow down the scope of network operators that are subject to the rule of non-discrimination. The government should also have more explicit legal ground to adopt the Guidelines. Some provisions of the draft Standards should also be reconsidered from the perspective of the constitutional principles established in the protection of fundamental rights.