http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
요양급여적정성 평가자료를 이용한 예방적 항생제 사용과 수술부위 감염 발생의 관련성 연구
김경훈,박춘선,장진희,김남순,이진서,최보람,이병란,이규덕,김선민,염선아,Kim, Kyoung-Hoon,Park, Choon-Seon,Chang, Jin-Hee,Kim, Nam-Soon,Lee, Jin-Seo,Choi, Bo-Ram,Lee, Byung-Ran,Lee, Kyoo-Duck,Kim, Sun-Min,Yeom, Seon-A 대한예방의학회 2010 예방의학회지 Vol.43 No.3
Objectives: To examine the prophylactic antibiotic use in reducing surgical site infection. Methods: This was a retrospective study for patients aged 18 years and older who underwent gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, colectomy, cesarean section and hysterectomy. The data source was quality assessment data of the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service gathered from medical records of 302 national hospitals. Prophylactic antibiotic use was defined as: timely antibiotic administration or inappropriate antibiotic selection. We performed hierarchical logistic regression to examine the association between prophylactic antibiotic use and surgical site infection with adjustment for covariates. Results: The study population consisted of 16 348 patients (1588 gastrectomies, 2327 cholecystectomies, 1,384 colectomies, 3977 hysterectomies and 7072 cesarean sections) and surgical site infection was identified in 351 (2.1%) patients. The rates of timely antibiotic administration and inappropriate antibiotic selection varied according to procedures. Cholecystectomy patients who received timely prophylactic antibiotic had a significantly reduced risk of surgical site infection compared with those who did not receive a timely prophylactic antibiotics (OR 0.64, 95% CI=0.50-0.83), but no significant reduction was observed for other procedures. When inappropriate prophylactic antibiotics were given, the risk of surgical site infection significantly increased: 8.26-fold (95% CI=4.34-15.7) for gastrectomy, 4.73-fold (95% CI=2.09-10.7) for colectomy, 2.34-fold (95% CI=1.14-4.80) for cesarean section, 4.03-fold (95% CI=1.93-8.42) for hysterectomy. Conclusions: This study examines the association among timely antibiotic administration, inappropriate antibiotic selection and surgical site infection. Patients who received timely and appropriate antibiotics had a decreased risk of surgical site infection. Efforts to improve the timing of antibiotic administration and use of appropriate antibiotic are needed to lower the risk of surgical site infection.
김동숙 ( Dong Sook Kim ),정진희 ( Jin Hee Jung ),진동찬 ( Dong Chan Jin ),김미경 ( Mi Kyoung Kim ),이규덕 ( Kyoo Duck Lee ),김선민 ( Seon Min Kim ),이병란 ( Byoung Lan Lee ) 대한신장학회 2009 Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Vol.28 No.5
Purpose: This study was a pilot study to develop structure, clinical performance and outcome measurement and criteria for increasing number of dialysis facilities and patients to provide quality of care. Methods: The six components of developing quality indicators for hemodialysis were as follows: 1) Organizing expert panel members. 2) Selecting the area: to reflect stakeholders` opinion, structured interviews were done. And literature reviews were performed to investigate guidelines and quality measurements of foreign countries. 3) Selecting clinical performance indicators: From experts` opinions and literature review. 4) Developing candidate indicators. 5) Performing demonstration survey: Systemic sampling was performed and 43 facilities were participated in self-answered medical record survey. 6) Based on preliminary evaluation model, final indicators were selected from expert panel reviews. Results: Eleven measures of structure, thirteen performance measures of process and nine monitoring measures of outcome were developed based on literature review and clinical practice guideline. As for criterion-related validity, those of process and outcome were most high and in case of face validity, those of structure and process were most high. The most valid quality indicators were the rate of internal medicine specialist, dialysis frequency per doctor, whether or not keeping emergency equipment, examination of water quality, hemodialysis adequacy (Kt/V), monitoring arterial venous graft for stenosis maintenance of iron storage, and administration of supplemental iron. Conclusion: By developing quality indicators of hemodialysis and performing demonstration evaluation, quality of care for hemodialysis patients is expected to be improved, so as to promote hemodialysis patients` health and improve on quality of life.