RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재후보

        지골피(地骨皮)와 치자(梔子) 합제(合劑)가 강제수영부하실험에서 HPA-Axis와 Catecholamine system에 미치는 영향

        오정진,이태희,Oh, Jeong-Jin,Lee, Tae-Hee 대한한의학방제학회 2012 大韓韓醫學方劑學會誌 Vol.20 No.1

        Objectives : In this study the antidepressant effects of mixture of Lycii Radicis Cortex and Gardeniae Fructus on the change of HPA-Axis and Catecholamine system was investigated Methods : The forced swimming test was performed. The expression of CRF, c-Fos in the PVN, and TH in the VTA and LC were measured with immunohistochemical method. And the experimental groups were divided into the Extraction after Mix group(A) and Mix after Extraction group(B). The effects of both group were compared. Results : The duration of immobility in the FST was decreased significantly in three groups except B100(P<0.01). B100 was shown the significant increase(P<0.05). The expression of CRF in PVN was decreased significantly in all group(P<0.05~P<0.01). The expression of c-Fos in PVN was decreased in A100, A400 and was increased significantly in B100, B400(P<0.05). The expression of TH in VTA and LC were decreased significantly in all group(P<0.001). Conclusions : Effects of Extraction after Mix group(A) and Mix after Extraction group(B) on the HPA-Axis system and Catecholamine system were validated.

      • KCI등재

        팔진탕가감방(八珍湯加減方)이 항종양(抗腫瘍) 면역반응(免疫反應)과 항암제(抗癌劑)로 유발(誘發)한 부작용(副作用)에 미치는 영향(影響)

        오정진,원진희,이언정,문석재,Oh Jeung-Jean,Won Jin-Hee,Lee Eon-Jeong,Moon Seok-Jae 대한한방내과학회 1998 大韓韓方內科學會誌 Vol.19 No.2

        Paljintanggagmbang has been used for cure of tumor as a traditional medicine without any experimental evidence to support the rational basis for its clinical use. This study was carried out to evaluate. the possible therapeutic or antitumoral effects of Paljintanggagmbang extract against tumor, and to carry out some mechanisms responsible for its effect. Experimental studis were performed for measurement of Humoral and Cellular Immune Response and Phagocytosis in Mice treated with mitomytion C(MMC) and Paljintanggagmbang alone and combination. The results obtained in this study were as follows 1. The adminstration of Paljintanggagmbang extract decresed size of tumors cell which MCA induced. 2. The adminstration of Paljintanggagmbang extract decresed growth of the tumors which S 180 transplant. 3. The adminstration of Paljintanggagmbang extract decresed reproduction of A549, Hep3b, 3LL cell and S 180 in vivo. 4. The adminstration of Paljintanggagmbang extract incresed activity of the NK cell. These results also suggested that effect of Paljintanggagmbang might be chiefly due to nonspecific enhancement of Humoral and Cellular Immune Response and Phagocytosis in Mice treated with MMC and Paljintanggagmbang alone and combination.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        법은 둥글다: 통합진보당 해산심판의 코드

        오정진 ( Jung Jin Oh ) 법과사회이론학회 2014 법과 사회 Vol.0 No.47

        On 5th November in 2013, the Government requested an adjudication on dissolution of ‘The Unified Progressive Party’ to the Constitutional Court. So the event of a dissolution of the political party which is the first in constitutional history pushed into the diagram of law is constituted as a banal case regarding North Korea. This paper based on the seven times attendance of court shows that the trial is grounded on the code which contains the event into the round diagram of law with circular words and excludes the edges. The trial is processed tediously not by argument of whether The Unified Progressive Party is contrary or not to the democratic basic order, the term of dissolution of the political party rather by insistent pleading of the Government that the relation of the party and North Korea is positive. Irrespectively which part, the witness caught up by law``s diagram was considerably accommodated to system. For law is round and the angular can not be accepted, the horn of North Korea is still taboo that should not be spoken. As the round diagram of law is operated, the speech and thought are banned and become poor, being and action are disapproved and put to silence, but law and power will remain similarly without shame to the future. Then what do we do with such like a diagram of law? We have to resist to it with multiple ways and externalize the event in order to not be confined in law because the diagram is not all there is. In short, citizen must do politics properly by themselves.

      • KCI등재

        법의 공정성 : 허구적 당위에서 실천으로

        오정진(Oh Jung-Jin) 부산대학교 법학연구소 2010 법학연구 Vol.51 No.2

        공정이란 말은 그것이 무엇을 의미하는지 명확한 것은 아니지만 일상 생활에서 흔히 쓰이며, 중요하게 취급된다. 특히 법에 있어서 공정성은 허구적 개념일지언정 당연히 추구해야 하는 법이념적 가치이다. 때문에 존 롤즈의 법이론에서 보듯이 공정성은 핵심적인 전제로 설정되어 있으며 현대의 법제는 이를 보장하기 위한 장치를 확보하고자 한다. 우리의 경우 역시 헌법재판소가 법의 공정성은 헌법원리라고 밝히고 있는 가운데, 다음과 같은 몇몇 방식들에 기해 공정성을 찾아가고자 하고 있다. 첫째, 불공정성이나 부당함을 금지하거나 회피한다. 즉, ‘독점규제 및 공정거래에 관한 법률’을 위시한, 명시적으로 ‘공정’을 이념으로서 표방하고 있는 법규들은, 무엇이 공정한 것인가를 말하는 대신, 무엇이 공정하지 않은 행위인지 규정하고 이를 금지하거나 회피하게 함으로써 공정성을 도모하고자 한다. 문제는, 구체적인 행위가 과연 그러한 불공정한 것인지 여부에 대한 판단은 여전히 모호하다는 점이다. 둘째, 우리 법은 현저한 불균형을 회피함으로써 공정성을 확보하고자 하기도 한다. 이 경우 역시 어느 정도가 현저히 유리하거나 불리한지 판단하기 쉽지 않다는 문제가 있다. 셋째, 상당히 많은 규정들에서는 비공개를 통해 업무의 공정성을 기하고자 하는 방식을 취한다. 그렇지만 공개로 공정성이 위태로워진다는 우려 자체가 다분히 행정편의적인 발상이다. 아울러, 제척, 기피, 회피 등 공정한 재판을 받을 권리를 위한 몇몇 절차적 제도들도 있지만 ‘공정한 재판을 기대하기 어려운 사정’에 대한 판단은 여전히 질적일 수밖에 없으며 그 때문에 자연히 이에 대한 시비도 있다. 이처럼 그 위상에도 불구하고 법의 공정성은 아직 안정적으로 구현되고 있다고는 볼 수 없다. 더욱이 근래 우리 사회에서 이슈가 되었던 신영철 대법관의 재판 개입 사건 역시 재판의 독립성과 관련하여 주로 논의되었을 뿐, 사건의 본질이라고 할 만한 ‘공정한’ 재판을 받을 권리의 침해에 대해서는 거의 언급되지 않았다는 점이야말로 법의 공정성이 실은 얼마나 취약한 것이며 위기에 처해 있는지를 보여주는 반증이라고 할 것이다. 그럼, 어떻게 해야 할 것일까? 무엇보다도 공정성을 실천하게 하는 추가적인 제도와 그에 부합하는 관행 및 분위기의 조성이 요청된다. 특히 법원이 무엇이 공정한 것인지에 대한 열린 모색의 장으로 거듭 나는 것이 중요하다. 아울러 그러한 노력을 추동할 수 있기 위해서는 대중의 윤리적 인식과 행동이 필요함은 물론이다. 아마도 그러한 윤리는, 보통 사람의 순수한 믿음과 충실에 기해서 강력하게 발현될 것이며, 그 행동은 공정성에 대한 기존의 사회적 타협의 수준 자체를 변화시켜 나감으로써, 그간 온전히 구현될 수 없었던 허구적 당위로서의 공정성이 실천적으로 작동하는 기적을 가능하게 할 것이다. The word of fairness is often used and taken seriously although what it means is not definite. Especially in the field of law, the fairness is fictitious concept but the value that ought to be inquired. Therefore as in the legal theory of John Rawls, the fairness is set as the core premise and the modern legal system secures the mechanism through which guarantees the fairness. Also in our society, while the constitutional court says that the fairness of law is the constitutional principle, to access toward fairness, several methods are taken; Firstly, the unfair or unjust are prohibited. That is, the laws that represent the fairness as vision including the Antimonopoly Law do not say that what is the fair but instead regulate what is the unfair. And here is the problem: the judgment about weather a certain concrete doing is unfair or not is unclear. Secondly, our law avoids severe imbalance. Of course also in that circumstance there is the same problem: it is very hard to measure the degree of imbalance. Thirdly, many rules protect the fairness by the non open of information. But the worry that the fairness would be in risk by openness itself is so much administrative biased. Finally, there are some procedural institutions for fair trial but the judgment about the acceptance of such system is still so qualitative that there are disputes. In short, though having the high priority, the fairness of law is not accomplished steadily. Moreover the fact that our society's discussion about the recent case of 'the Supreme Court justice Shin' is limited in the independence of trial and not touched the rights of fair trial reveals thar the fairness of law is weak and in crisis. So, What should we do? Above all, the additional system to realize the fairness, the corresponding practice and environment are needed. Specifically the court itself should be open field in which we can discuss about what is the fair. Of course in order to do that, peoples' ethical recognition and practice are needed. Perhaps such ethics will be developed by ordinary peoples' innocent belief and faith and such practice will make the miracle possible that the fairness as fictitious ought can be operated in reality by changing the level of social compromise about fairness.

      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼