김대중, 노무현 정부의 대북정책과 국내정치: 문제는“밖”이 아니라“안”이다

신종대 ( Jong Dae Shin ) 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2013 한국과 국제정치 Vol.29 No.2

대북정책과 남북관계는 상호 밀접한 연관을 갖는다. 이 글은 김대중, 노무현 정부의 대북정책 추진과정에서 국내정치 요인이 어떻게 작용하고 영향을 미쳤는가를 분석하는 시도이다. 이 글이 김대중·노무현 정부를 분석 대상으로 하는 이유는 두 정부 시기 동안 이전 정부와는 달리 가장 적극적인 대북관여정책이 추진되었으며, 이에 따라 대북정책을 둘러싼 국내적 논란도 그만큼 고조된 시기였다는 점이다. 따라서 대북관여와 국내정치의 관계, 즉 대북정책 추진과 국내 지지기반 간의 연관과 의미를 잘 포착할 수 있는 시기라고 보았기 때문이다. 이를 위해 김대중, 노무현 정부 시기 동안 대북정책 전개과정상의 균열과 갈등을 국내정치 요인에 초점을 맞추어 분석하고 평가해보았다. 그 결과 김대중, 노무현 정부의 대북정책추진에서 반성하고 비판해야 할 초점은 정치사회와 시민사회에서 대북정책에 대한 합의기반을 구축하는 데 소홀했다는 점이다. 즉 대북관여에 치중한 나머지, 정작 대북정책 추진동력의 원천인 국내관여를 등한시했다는 점이다. 따라서 대북정책을 추진함에 있어서 제일 중요한 문제는 국내정치 기반, 곧“문제는‘안’이야”라고 말할 수 있다. North Korea policy and inter-Korean relations are closely associated with each other. This paper analyzes the role of domestic politics and its effects on North Korea policy process under the Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun administrations. This paper took the two administrations as object of analysis because they promoted the most proactive engagement policy toward North Korea unlike their predecessors, resulting in tensed domestic discussion concerning North Korea policy. In that regard, this paper set such a time frame to capture the relations between engagement with North Korea and engagement of domestic constituents most properly, which will facilitate understanding of links between promoting North Korea policy and domestic supports for it. With that in mind, this paper analyzed and assessed divisions and frictions in domestic politics in the course of the two administrations` developing North Korea policy. It found that one of the biggest problems with North Korea policy during the two administrations was that they overlooked the importance of building domestic consensus for North Korea policy in both political arena and the civil society. That is, they were so preoccupied with engagement toward North Korea that they underestimated the need to undertake domestic engagement which is the source of gaining a right momentum to execute the policy. Therefore, the most important question concerning execution of North Korea policy is base for domestic support; we can say that “It”s the “inside”!

친족명칭과 이름을 통해서 살펴본 鎌倉 시대 武家의 지배원리

신종대(Shin, Jong-Dae) 대한일어일문학회 2015 일어일문학 Vol.67 No.-

The name system in Japan is very complicated thus; it can be divided into two characteristics. One is the various use of kinship terminology. In Japan, the four Chinese characters and words 姓, 氏, 名字, 苗字 are used to interpret kinship terminology. Looking at the foundation, 姓 and 氏 were used in classical Japan and 名字 and 苗字 were used in medieval Japan, showing difference in concept, but the mixed terms are used together in the present day. The kinship terminology used by Japanese people is various because it is closely connected to the change of the political system. This is because the terminology for legacy groups was used all along without extinction even while the nation transformed from Japanese Ritsuryou State to dynasty to feudal society. Especially as in medieval Japan was a period when the political powers were swerving from aristocrats to samurais, it was a period where both classical and medieval terminologies were mixed up and can also be interpreted as when Japan began to develop its own unique name system. Therefore, it is necessary to scope into when either classical kinship terminology or medieval kinship terminology was used. Another characteristic that is shown in the name system in Japan is complication. In the case of samurais, when they are first born, they use their childhood name (兒名) until they celebrate genpuku (元服)(coming of age ceremony) and receive an alias (通稱) which is their real name (實名) and Kemyou(假名). Then they use their job title as names (職名) during their lifetime, and afterlife, they are given Buddhist names (法名). The names become very long when listed. In this study, concentrating on these two facts, the reasons for the name system in Japan being complicated would be made clear looking through the timeframe of medieval Japan. Therefore, samurais from the Kamakura period will be analyzed closely in the following two reasons: 1. why uji and myouji (名字) were first used together among the samurais, and 2. when actually the use of uji and myouji was differentiated between samurai families.

사무라이도코로(侍所)를 통해서 본 가마쿠라 막부의 정치양상

신종대(Shin Jong-Dae) 일본어문학회 2003 일본어문학 Vol.23 No.-

5.16 쿠데타에 대한 북한의 인식과 대응

신종대(Shin Jong-Dae) 한국학중앙연구원 2010 한국학 Vol.33 No.1

북·미 간 과학기술 교류협력의 현황과 과제

신종대(Shin, Jong-Dae),최창용(Choi, Chang yong) 북한대학원대학교 2006 현대북한연구 Vol.9 No.3

북한요인과 국내정치: 1968년 북한요인의 영향을 중심으로

신종대 ( Jong Dae Shin ) 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2004 한국과 국제정치 Vol.20 No.3

일본 전근대 시대별 무사 연구

신종대(Shin, Jong-Dae) 대한일어일문학회 2017 일어일문학 Vol.73 No.-

In the process of development and development of history, there is a history that is developed as intended according to the political purpose, such as a policy or system created by the will of the state or ruler. On the other hand, a minor event or accident changes the flow of history. The history of textbooks and historical figures reveals that most of them focus on the former. If you look at the history of history, however, there are a lot of things that fall into the latter. And there are cases in which certain principles, policies, and institutions create social phenomena or consciousness and behavior that were unexpected. The appearance of samurai class in Japanese history is the beginning of new paradigm that we have not experienced until now. The appearance of the warrior class has brought about unexpected social phenomena and changes, and has created new patterns of thinking and behavior. The historian of the term samurai is long. It can not be the same as the existence form of the war in every age. The form of existence of the samurai changed according to the times, and the kinds of samurai vary. Therefore, it is difficult to say Japanese warrior in a word. There is a priori image from the word "warrior" as a class. This is a common image that everyone feels when they say warriors. However, it is difficult to grasp the Japanese warrior if it is overlooked that the form of existence by the age is different. This is because the samurai of the Heian and Kamakura era, the south and north dynasties, the samurai of the Muromachi period, the samurai of the Sengoku era, and the samurai of the Edo era.

남북관계사의 분석 수준과 주요 의제

신종대 ( Jong Dae Shin ) 경남대학교 극동문제연구소 2014 한국과 국제정치 Vol.30 No.3

이 글은 지난 시기의 남북관계로부터 어떠한 시사점과 교훈을 이끌어낼 수 있는지 두 분단국의 상호대면, 동북아관계 속의 남북관계, 그리고 국내정치와 남북관계의 연관 수준에서 몇가지 의제를 중심으로 시론적으로나마 논의해보려는 시도이다. 세 수준에서 남북관계사를 살펴보는 것은 남북관계가 두 분단국의 상호대면뿐만 아니라, 국제환경을 포함한 동북아 지역관계와 남북한 국내정치가 제공하는 공간과 압력속에서 작동·전개되기 때문이다. 한편 70여 년을 맞고 있는 남북관계사 전체를 본격적으로 조망하여 교훈을 도출하는 시도와 작업 역시 필요하다. 그동안의 남북관계는 냉전기 적대와 대립 일변도에서 어느 정도 벗어났으나, 완전한 화해·협력으로 이행하지 못한채‘짧은 화해 뒤의 긴 대립 국면’이 지속되고 있다. 남북관계사를 회고하여 세 수준에서의 일정한 패턴, 남북한의 행동유형 및 사고방식, 놓쳐버린 역사적 기회, 그리고 역사의 교훈에 둔감하여 비롯된 반복되는 오류 등을 성찰하고 그 현재적 의미를 새기는 것이 중요하다. 그리고 남북관계에 대한 이해와 교훈 도출을 위해서는 남북관계에 대한 의견보다 사실에 집중하여, 이념과 가치가 사실에 개입하거나 앞서는 일을 피해야 할 것이다. 남북관계는 단지 두 분단국의 상호대면 수준이나 동력에 의해서가 아니라, 동북아 지역관계나 남북한 국내정치의 상호 연관과 작용 속에서 전개된다. 따라서 세 수준 간의 공조 없이 일정 수준 이상의 또는 지속적인 발전이 어렵다. 또한 지난 시기의 남북관계사는 한국의 주도적 역할 및 남북관계의 우선성을 절대시할 것이 아니라, 유연한 사고와 적실성 있는 접근과 전략으로 남북관계의 진전 및 한반도의 안보·평화구조의 개선을 기해야 함을 시사하고 있다. Relations between the two Koreas have gone through many stages since division. Over the first several decades of division, relations between the two Koreas reflected regional and global Cold War tensions. Beginning in the early 1970s, however, Seoul and Pyongyang moved toward cautious co-existence. Since the end of the global Cold War, to a degree, North-South Korean relations have moved away from antagonism and confrontation. Nonetheless the two Koreas have failed to achieve complete reconciliation and continue to sway between peace and confrontation. Moreover, inter-Korean relations have deteriorated markedly in recent years, despite two North-South summit meetings since 2000. Looking back, each agreement reached between Seoul and Pyongyang provided the opportunity for a major transformation in inter-Korean relations. However, soon after each of these important milestones in North-South relations, dealings between Seoul and Pyongyang drastically deteriorated, often returning to open hostility or, at the very least, animosity. Dramatic progress and equally dramatic retrogression have been the defining characteristics of the inter-Korean relationship thus far. This paper will review the history of inter-Korean relations and clarify both the significance and lessons we can draw from the experience of inter-Korean dialogue and relations. It explores inter-Korean relations on the three levels: interface dynamics of the two Koreas level, Northeast Asia regional level, and domestic level.

에도시대 후기와 메이지시대 초기의 양자(養子) 제도에서 볼 수 있는 역사적 의의

신종대(Shin Jong dae) 동북아시아문화학회 2021 동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집 Vol.2021 No.10

Relatives represented as adopted children were especially important in samurai society as an important keyword for understanding Japanese society. In the absence of a successor, it was not only used as a means of adopting close relatives such as younger brothers and nephews, but also as a means of expanding military power in the Middle Ages. Since the Meiji era, many Japanese believe that even if there was some historical development in the pre-modern era, it had nothing to do with Japan"s modernization = Westernization genealogy. However, since the Meiji era, Japanese researchers have begun to recognize that there is a certain direction in Japanese culture. This recognition shows the process of samuraiization in Japanese life. It expanded and strengthened its influence through various forms of kinship as well as samurai society in the Middle Ages. More than 150 years after the end of samurai rule, there are still many things related to samurai in various parts of Japan. Therefore, in this paper, In order to investigate the development of adoptive system without regard to pure blood, we focus on the Edo period.

武家政権と人的ネットワーク

申宗大(Shin Jong-Dae) 동북아시아문화학회 2008 동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집 Vol.- No.-