http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 시새롬(Saerom Si) (검색결과 4 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
플랫폼 경제의 부상과 혁신적이고 공정한 산업 생태계 조성 방안
최병삼(Byong-Sam Choi),시새롬(Saerom Si) 과학기술정책연구원 2021 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
A platform economy where platforms bring about huge changes across all areas of the economy is developing around the world. In the past, U.S. and Chinese companies led major platforms in the digital industry. Recently, however, Korean companies are also actively challenging to build platforms. Platforms have the potential to make fundamental changes in the Korean economy, and the next few years will decide whether Korean companies will be able to successfully build platforms and lead the domestic or global ecosystems. It is time for research on platform promotion and regulation measures to promote platform creation and ecosystem leadership of Korean companies. In order to establish national platform policy, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of platforms and to understand the current status of their competition. Major keywords related to the characteristics of platforms include switching costs and multi-homing in the introduction stage, network effects and critical mass in the growth stage, ‘market for lemons’ in the reinforcement stage, two-sided market pricing in the harvest stage, and platform envelopment in the expansion stage. To overview the current status of platform competition at home and abroad, competition for platform leadership has virtually ended in some areas, but fierce competition for leadership is currently underway in many other areas. Taking into account different characteristics of platforms from general products and the current status of competition, we cannot be too cautious when establishing and applying platform policies. Looking at platform policies of other countries, the platform anti-trust bill package was proposed in June 2021 in the United States. Representative bills include American Choice and Innovation Online Act, Ending Platform Monopolies Act, Platform Competition and Opportunity Act, and Augmenting Compatibility and Competition by Enabling Service Switching Act. Representative bills announced in Europe include the Digital Market Act and the Digital Service Act. In Korea, various platform-related bills such as the Online Platform Fairness Act and the Online Platform User Protection Act have been proposed. Although regulations on platforms are generally tightened at home and abroad, it seems that platform policies should be established in consideration of national interests of our country. Considering overseas policy trends and interviews with platform policy experts, this study proposes the following policies. First, it is necessary to support platform companies to solve problems such as conflicts with professionals and consideration for the vulnerable so that they can overcome barriers to entry into the market. Second, in order for platform companies to secure a large number of high-quality participants, different requirements should be identified according to the type and situation of platform workers and solved through social dialogues. Third, in order for platform companies to revitalize ecosystems and transactions, institutional mechanisms should be prepared to make it difficult for platforms to favor their products in sectors with weak market competition, and autonomous regulations should be encouraged in sectors with strong market competition. Fourth, platform companies should be given autonomy to determine appropriate fees, but the government can present guidelines if necessary. Fifth, platform companies should be allowed to acquire competitive startups except in hostile mergers and acquisitions of companies emerging as potential competitors in the existing business area. Sixth, in order to prevent reverse discrimination of domestic companies, regulations that are difficult to apply to overseas companies in reality should not be applied to domestic companies, but should also be applied to overseas companies if regulations are essential. Finally, the platform industry should be promoted by facilitating pilot projects, monitoring the effectiveness of data
-
-
-
정일영(Ilyoung Jung),정미애(Miae Jung),윤정섭(Jungsub Yoon),송명진(Myung Jin Song),박병원(Byeong-Won Park),윤정현(Junghyun Yoon),김가은(Gaeun Kim),김지은(Jieun Kim),추수진(Soojin Choo),손은정(Eunjung Son),시새롬(Saerom Si),황윤하(Yunha 과학기술정책연구원 2021 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
Korean society is experiencing a severe level of polarization that has not been experienced before in the overall society and in each area of industry due to the prolonged aftermath of COVID-19. The polarization phenomenon in society as a whole is a factor that accelerates the imbalance between individuals and groups, and between metropolitan areas and regions. Therefore, This study has two research questions related to the prospect of polarization in the post-corona era that Korean society is facing from a mid- to long-term perspective. - What are the aspects of polarization that Korean society is likely to face? - What is the policy direction that should be prepared at the system level, which is closely related to the key drivers of deepening this polarization? The scope of this study was focused on digital, which has accelerated the non-face-to-face society and is a driving force for polarization in the COVID-19 situation, region in the spatial sense where polarization occurs, and company. This study was conducted in part 1 and part 2. Part 1 predicts the polarization of the post-corona era. Chapter 2 looked at the concepts of inequality and polarization for the future outlook of polarization, and dealt with methodologies and research methods for polarization projections. In Chapters 3 to 5, policy alternatives were derived by analyzing the current situation of digital, regional and corporate polarization, and predicting the future. A future theme based on big data was derived, and citizen workshops and surveys were conducted based on this. In addition, we imagined the future of polarization through sci-fi ultra-short stories and illustrations. Finally, policy alternatives for each module were proposed. Chapter 6, Comprehensive Prospects and Conclusions, draws on the previously discussed future vision as one, and examines the mid- to long-term policy direction for resolving it through the system causal map. Part 2 is about building a knowledge base for future research and disseminating results. In order to proceed with this study, a future issue search program system was used, and a knowledge base for future research was established through a network of related experts. In order to spread the results of future research to society, 『Future Horizon+』 was published, and a book is about to be published.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
