성별 의사소통스타일의 습득: 언어사회화 과정

서경희 ( Kyung Hee Suh ) 경희대학교 인문학연구소 2008 인문학연구 Vol.14 No.-

남성과 여성의 의사소통방식 - 레이코프(Lakoff)의 재조명

서경희(Kyung-Hee Suh) 한국외국어대학교 영미연구소 2006 영미연구 Vol.15 No.-

  Do women and men talk differently? What linguistic practices and ideologies are associated with women"s speech? This article is an attempt to examine the observations made by Lakoff (1975) that women use language in a way that reinforces their subordinate status. Based on a large body of research, this article examines the gender differences in communicative styles with special reference to several linguistic features that have been characterized as women"s speech, which include use of tag questions, hedges, asking questions and backchanneling signals. The overview suggests that we should reevaluate aspects of what is called "woman"s language", which indexes women"s sensitivity to interpersonal aspects of talk. Women tend to focus on rapport and the affective, supportive function of conversation while men focus on report rather than rapport. Conversations for men can be highly competitive since conversations are about imparting information, talking for a purpose, demonstrating expertise. It is shown that consideration of the feeling of others has been the hallmark of every aspect of women"s verbal behavior which has been examined.

영유아기 자녀의 일반적인 문제행동 지도를 중심으로 한 부모역량 강화 프로그램 개발과 적용 효과

서경희(Suh, Kyung Hee),이진화(Lee, Jinwha) 한국육아지원학회 2020 육아지원연구 Vol.15 No.2

본 연구는 영유아기 자녀의 일반적인 문제행동 지도를 중심으로 체계적인 부모역할하기를 통해 부모역량을 강화할 수 있는 프로그램을 개발하여 이를 적용하고 효과를 검증하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 프로그램 구성을 위해 문헌고찰, 요구도 조사 및 분석, 프로그램 초안구성, 전문가 협의 등의 과정을 거쳐 프로그램을 개발하였다. 개발된 프로그램의 효과를 알아보기 위해 2019년 5월 16일부터 7월 25일까지 D시에 있는 T어린이집에 다니는 영유아의 부모 12명을 대상으로 주 1회 총 10회기의 부모교육을 실시하였다. 본 프로그램은 7단계의 교수-학습단계가 매주 순환과정이 반복적으로 이루어질 수 있도록 구성되었으며, 사례탐색과 토론, 실습을 통한 적용점을 가정에서 바로 적용할 수 있도록 구성되었다. 이러한 과정을 통해 양육행동과 양육효능감의 변화를 보기 위해 프로그램 적용 전과 후에 검사를 실시하고, 그 차이를 검증하였다. 연구 결과, 프로그램 참여를 통해 온정적인 양육행동은 향상되고 통제적인 양육행동은 감소하였으며, 양육효능감 중 유능감은 향상되고 불안감은 감소하는 결과를 보였다. 이러한 결과는 실제적인 사례와 실습을 통한 반복적인 부모교육이 자녀의 일반적인 문제행동 개선에 기여할 수 있음을 시사한다. The purposes of this study were to develop and apply the parent competency program focused on guidance of young children’s problem behaviors and to verify its effectiveness. The program was developed through the process of literature review, needs survey and analysis, preliminary program development, and consultation with experts. In order to verify the effectiveness of the program, a total of 10 sessions of parent education were carried out from May 16th to July 25th 2019, with 12 parents whose children were enrolled at T Nursery in D city. This program was structured in a way that the seven-step teaching-learning cyclic process could be repeatedly performed on a weekly basis. Furthermore, the program was designed to be applied at home directly through case study, discussion, and practice. Through this process, the differences in parenting behavior and parenting efficacy before and after the program were verified. The results showed that through participating in the program, warm parenting behavior was increased while controlling parenting behavior was reduced. Moreover, in parenting efficacy, competency was improved while anxiety was decreased. These results imply that repeated parent education through practical cases and practices can contribute to improving children’s general problem behaviors.

포스트사회주의적 변화에서의 민간(民間)의 역동성과 선행성(先行性)

김재석 서울대학교 통일평화연구원 2019 통일과 평화 Vol.11 No.2

This paper investigates the leading role of minjian in postsocialist transformations of China and North Korea and illuminates the historical and sociocultural conditions that have contributed to its initial formation and survival under the socialist government. By understanding key characteristics of minjian, we can understand the dynamic relationship between state apparatuses and minjian. According to the general explanation, China’s postsocialist changes began in the mid-1980s with the central party-state’s leadership symbolized by Deng Xiaoping. Similarly, North Korea’s postsocialist transformation is also believed to advance under the supreme leader Kim Jong-un’s leadership. I critically evaluate the effectiveness of the analytical framework that focuses on the central government’s political decision and leadership in explaining postsocialist transformations. Specifically, this study analyzes grassroots changes in minjian such as unofficial domestic and overseas trades and ordinary people’s growing participation in various non-socialist activities, which appeared before the official initiation of postsocialist policies. Following this research’s model of “minjian prior to the government,” not the party-state but minjian first formed non-socialist practices. Only after the practices had generated certain positive outcomes, the party-state recognized the minjian practices and started the official version of postsocialist reform. 본 논문은 중국과 북한의 포스트사회주의적 변화에서 민간이 담당하는 선행(先行)적 역할과 이 역할이 형성되고 지속되어 온 역사적·사회문화적 배경을 조명하고, 민간과 국가기구 사이의 역동적 관계를 이해하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 중국 정부와 당은 역사적으로 형성된 백성(民)과 관리(官)의 이분법적 구분을 답습하여, 민간을 사회주의 체제 외부(体制外)에 있는 모든 것과 연관시켰다. 연구자는 민간개념을 시민 혹은 시민사회에 대한서구 정치이론의 규범적 전제들로부터 상대적으로 자유로운 개념으로 간주한다. 기존의이론적 전제들로부터 자유로운 민간개념은 포스트사회주의적인 변화에서 개인 혹은 집단들이 행하는 실제 역할과 이들이 국가기구와 맺는 관계를 구체적으로 분석하는 데 유용하다. 일반적으로 중국의 포스트사회주의적 변화는 1980년대 중반 덩샤오핑으로 대표되는중앙정부의 지도력에 의해 추동되었다고 이해되며, 북한의 변화 역시 최고지도자인 김정은이 이끄는 강력한 중앙권력에 의해 지도되고 있는 것으로 나타난다. 중앙권력의 정치적 결단에 중점을 두어 포스트사회주의적 변화를 설명하는 접근법의 유효성을 비판적으로 검토하기 위해, 본 연구에서는 중국과 북한에서 공식적인 포스트사회주의적 변화가 나타나기 이전 시기에 민간의 영역에서 이와 유사한 변화의 움직임이 나타났는지를 분석한다. 연구자가 가정한 ‘선(先) 민간, 후(後) 정부’ 모형에 따르면, 중국과 북한의 변화는정부가 아닌 민간이 비공식 차원에서 비(非)사회주의적 관행을 만들어 내고, 이것이 일정한 성과를 거두자 정부가 해당 관행을 추인하는 방식으로 나타난 것으로 이해할 수 있다.

한국어 지시사 "그"의 상호작용적 의미연구

서경희 ( Kyung Hee Suh ) 한국외국어대학교 언어연구소 2002 언어와 언어학 Vol.0 No.29

본 연구에서는 한국어 지시사 ``그``의 기본의미로 ``공간 지시``를 가정하는 것은 설득력이 없음을 밝히고 ``그``의 용법을 다른 지시사와 대비하는 기존의 시각에서 벗어나 담화/대화상에서의 ``그``의 상호작용적 의미를 밝히고 그러한 의미가 어떻게 ``그``가 쓰이는 다양한 맥락을 설명할 수 있는지를 논하였다. 즉 공간 지시사(spatial deixis)로서의 ``그`` 뿐만 아니라 조응사(anaphora)로서의 ``그``, 화자가 적절한 단어를 찾을 때나 말의 공백을 메울 때 쓰는 말이음어(filler)로서의 ``그``, 강화사(intensifier)로서의 ``그``, 그리고 ``집합표지어(set-marking tag)``의 일부로 나타나는 ``그``의 기능을 모두 ``현 담화의 실현 순간에 다양한 화ㆍ청자의 관점을 조정하여 화자와 청자 사이의 상호적 참여(interpersonal involvement)를 요구``하는데 쓰이는 담화의 상호작용적 기능(interactional function) 속에서 파악하고, 이러한 여러 가지 기능이 서로 유기적으로 연관되어 있음을 일상대화 자료들의 분석을 통하여 검증하였다. 다양한 맥락에서 화자는 ``그``의 사용을 통해 청자와 공유하고 있는 전제적 지식이나 견해에 대하여 상호간의 주의를 환기하고 집중시킴으로써 화ㆍ청자 사이에 성공적 의사소통을 위한 조정(co-ordination)작업을 수행하고 청자의 적극적인 참여를 기대하게 되며, 그것을 통해 궁극적으로는 화자와 청자 사이의 공통관심을 모아가는 담화전략적 기능을 수행하게 되는 것이다.

미국영어 코퍼스자료에 근거한 ¨think of¨와 ¨think about¨의 분석

서경희(Kyung-Hee Suh) 한국외국어대학교 영미연구소 2007 영미연구 Vol.17 No.-

The two verb phrases, think of and think about, have been generally regarded as interchangeable, and no serious attempt has been made to discover potential differences between these two verb phrases in terms of meaning and function in discourse context. The present study aims to present a corpus-based examination of think of and think about, focusing on the differences in their use and distribution in spoken and written American English. An analysis of tokens from the Michigan Corpus and the Brown Corpus leads to the observation that think of and think about show different skewings in collocations and co-occurring patterns, which in turn contributes to defining their meaning and function in discourse. A close examination of data reveals the following. First, think of is four times more frequent than think about in written discourse while think about is more frequent thanthink of in spoken discourse. Second,think of favors an indefinite reference as its object while think about favors a definite reference. Third, think about is used to mark a prolonged action, hence durative, whereas the action denoted by the expression 'think of' takes place instantly, hence punctual. Based on these observations, I propose that think of denotes an instant/spontaneous action such as the display of a fleeting thought whereas think about denotes a planned and prolonged action, which requires a more active thinking process than in the case of think of. As such, think of can be paraphrased as "imagine, remember, or bring to one's mind" while think about can be paraphrased as "reflect upon or consider seriously."

인도네시아인과 한국인사이의 칭찬반응에 대한 대조연구

서경희 ( Kyung Hee Suh ) 한국외국어대학교 동남아연구소 2010 東南亞硏究 Vol.19 No.2

미디어 담화의 비판적 담화분석: 동남아 이주민 기사를 중심으로

서경희(Suh, Kyung-Hee),김규현(Kim, Kyu-hyun) 담화·인지언어학회 2019 담화와 인지 Vol.26 No.3

The ways in which Southeast Asian immigrants in Korea are represented in Korean media suggest an array of trait-ascribing categorization practices whose import is shaped by specific ideologies. From the perspectives of critical discourse analysis (CDA) and membership categorization analysis (MCA), the distinctively constructed descriptions of Southeast Asian immigrants observed in Korean newspapers (2009-2017) are analyzed in terms of how the ‘us/them’ distinction is discursively invoked in the ‘ideological square’ through the use of the twin strategies of positive self-presentation and negative other-presentation. A subtle form of ‘neo-orientalism’ is noted to underlie these practices, which are explicated in terms of a range of practices of invoking culturally-loaded specific categories. The findings indicate that ethnic Koreans are consistently represented in the media as the ‘(paternalistic) benefactor’ vis-à-vis the immigrants, who are positioned as the ‘(potentially undeserving) beneficiary’. These features point to some of the ways in which emerging multiculturalism in Korean society is being incipiently (and fragmentarily) addressed in Korean media discourse, reflexively manifesting its character as an ‘intra-national’ discourse in which the ‘other’s’ voice is solicited, heard and addressed on ‘our’ own terms, whether xenosceptically or altruistically formulated.

‘Whatever’의 표현적 기능

서경희(Kyung-Hee Suh) 한국외국어대학교 영미연구소 2008 영미연구 Vol.18 No.-

This study aims to present a corpus-based investigation of whatever, focusing on its expressive functions in spoken English. An examination of tokens from the Michigan Corpus and US TV Talk reveals thatwhatever as a non-modifier marks the speaker's epistemic and affective stance. As a stance marker, whatever is used when the speaker expresses his/her lack of commitment to precise definition of meaning or to any particular option/set of options. As such, whatever is used as a conversation filler, filling in a necessary interactional space when the speaker encounters trouble in producing the next item due. Whatever also marks a lack of certainty by the speaker. The speaker also uses whatever to avoid explicitly labelling what s/he has in mind, presumably because this may be impolite or inappropriate to the situation. In these cases, whatever appears as a tag attached to the referent(s), i.e., as a set-marking tag carrying a textual function. Stand-alonewhatever, which is more common in everyday conversation, carries an interactional/interpersonal function; whatever as part of a responsive turn usually suggests the speaker’s reluctance to engage or argue, expressing the speaker’s impatience or scepticism; it often serves to suspend argumentation when resolution or agreement seems unlikely, carrying the negative tone by the speaker. Whatever, in such a context, allows the interaction to move on and move into less turbulent waters, which often in turn leads to a topic shift.

영어영문학21제26권 2호 : 『플로리젤과 퍼디타』-모건과 개릭의 『겨울 이야기』각색

서경희 ( Kyung Hee Suh ) 21세기영어영문학회 2013 영어영문학21 Vol.26 No.2

This paper tries to examine the similarities and the differences of the two Florizel and Perdita`s, the two rival alterations of Shakespeare`s The Winter`s Tale by Macnamara Morgann and David Garrick, within the socio-cultural contexts of “the Garrick`s age” (1741-1776), when the imminent divorce of ‘stage’ and ‘page’ did not yet happen, and making adaptations of old plays rather than writing new ones became more suitable to the rival Theatres Royal in London mainly due to “the Stage Licensing Act” of 1737. Morgann`s alteration was a ‘pastoral comedy’ reduced into two acts, celebrating the love and marriage of Florizel and Perdita. The most important obstacle to their marriage was the barrier of class. The conflict was resolved by unfolding the mystery of Perdita`s birth, and the heir to the throne was lawfully and safely confirmed. Garrick`s alteration was a ‘dramatic pastoral`` transformed into three acts and could be arguably regarded as an adaptation closer to Shakespeare`s original compared with Morgann`s. However, Garrick`s alteration was mainly focused on Leontes` repentance and his family reunion and reconciliation. While his patriarchal wishes were fulfilled, the complex female characters were either silenced or marginalized, and their sentimental domesticity was emphasized. The two alterations by Morgann and Garrick remind us of the ‘multi-vocal’ potential of Shakespeare`s original and also of the fundamentally fluid and dynamic nature of drama and theater.