http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
나보코프의 오렌지 - 연극적 기원의 지표에서 예술 창작의 원리로
김윤하(Kim, Yunha) 한국슬라브유라시아학회 2021 슬라브학보 Vol.36 No.2
The purpose of this study is to illuminate one of the unexplored origins of Nabokov’s theatrical elements constructing his artistic world by focusing on a recurrent but relatively inconspicuous motif, the oranges in his novels. Many of the oranges operating as a so-called ‘orange motif’ in Nabokov’s works are originated from the Russian Silver Age culture, in particular, from V. E. Meyerhold’s oranges which had appeared in three modes(performance, journal, and divertissement) in the mid-1910s. We trace the parallel evolution of Nabokov’s sui generis narrative strategies and the orange motives to shed light on the multifarious aspects of theatricality and the utilization of those motives in various layers of narrative structure in his Russian-period novels, Mary, King, Queen, Knave, The Defense, Laughter in the Dark, and The Gift. Through this study, we can observe not only the gradual evolvement of oranges from the subtle markers implying the origin of theatricality in his novels to the crucial motif involved in constructing the main syuzhet of the entire novel, but its rather radical transformation into the motif of a fundamental artistic principle in The Gift. As for the transformation of the orange motif in The Gift, we try to demonstrate it by analyzing Fyodor’s own somewhat declaratory phrase(“but the kind of dust that makes the most orange of sunsets”) about his projected autobiographical work in the last episode of the novel, and by linking it with the orange charade at the beginning of the novel.
청각장애 아동과 일반 아동의 마찰음에 나타난 음향음성학적 특성 비교
김윤하(Kim, YunHa),김은연(Kim, Eunyeon),장승진(Jang, Seoung-Jin),최예린(Choi, Yaelin) 한국음성학회 2014 말소리와 음성과학 Vol.6 No.2
Alveolar fricative sounds /s/ and /s"/ are learned last for normal children in the speech development process for Koreans. These are especially difficult to articulate for hearing-impaired children often causing articulation errors. The acoustic phonetic evaluation uses testing tools to provide indirect and object information. These objective resources can be compared with standardized resources on speech when interpreting the results of a test. However, most previous studies in Korea did not consider acoustic studies that used the spectrum moment values of hearing-impaired children. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the characteristics of hearing-impaired children"s pronunciation of fricative sounds using spectrum moment values. For this purpose, the study selected a total of 10 hearing-impaired children (5 boys and 5 girls) currently in 3rd or 5th grade and attending one of the elementary schools in Seoul or Gyeonggi-do. For the selection process, their age, type of hearing aid, implantation of hearing aid (CI) before two years of age, hearing capacity (dB) before and after wearing the hearing aid, duration of speech rehabilitation, and time of learning alveolar fricative sounds were all considered. Also, 10 normal children (5 boys and 5 girls) were selected among 3rd or 5th grade students attending one of the elementary schools in Seoul or Gyeonggi-do. The subjects were asked to read the carrier sentence, "I say _______," including a list of 12 meaningless syllables composed of CV and VCV syllables, including alveolar fricative sounds /s/ and /s"/ and vowels /a/, /i/, and /u/. The recorded resources were processed through the Time-frequency Analysis Software Program to measure M1 (mean), M2 (variance), M3 (skewness), and M4 (kurtosis) of the fricative noise. No significant differences were found when comparing spectrum threshold values in the acoustic phonetic characteristics of hearing-impaired children and normal children in alveolar fricative sound pronunciation according to vowels /a/, /i/, and /u/, alveolar fricative sounds /s/ and /s"/, and syllable structure (CV, VCV) other than, for M3 in the comparison of groups according to disability. In the comparison of syllable structures, there were statistically significant differences in M1, M2, M3, and M4 with clinical significance. However, there was no significant difference in results when comparing the alveolar fricative sounds according to the vowels.