RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        의문사 'why'의 병합위치와 이동분석

        김연승 한국생성문법학회 2013 생성문법연구 Vol.23 No.4

        The purpose of this paper is to find out the syntactic structure where some syntactic peculiarities of interrogative why can be uniformly accounted for. Within the left periphery merge theory that why is base-generated in the left periphery of a clause, there are two options. One is the non-movement analysis that why never moves in the complementizer layer. The other is the movement analysis that why moves within the complementizer layer(i.e., from RP-Spec to IntP-Spec). On the basis of some pieces of empirical evidence, I have tried to illustrate that the movement analysis is more adequate than the non-movement analysis. I have shown that we cannot but adopt the movement analysis to uniformly account for the interaction of why with a quantifier or a focus operator, and some peculiar characteristics of why in multiple wh-questions.

      • KCI등재

        영어에서의 제자리-의문사구의 작용역 결정에 관한 연구

        김연승 한국현대언어학회 2005 언어연구 Vol.20 No.3

        This paper considers how the scope of a wh-in-situ is determined. Comparing two approaches toward the scope determination―movement analysis and non-movement analysis, this paper concludes that the latter is better than the former in both theoretical and empirical grounds. It has been illustrated that the examples suggested as evidence of covert movement of a wh-in-situ by Tanaka(1999), Pesetsky(2000), Watanabe(2001) can be systematically dealt with by a non-movement analysis like wh-licensing.

      • KCI등재후보

        확대투사원리와 격점검

        김연승 한국현대언어학회 2002 언어연구 Vol.18 No.2

        Ever since Chomsky (1981) proposed the EPP, there have been many attempts to derive the EPP effect from a deeper principle. Recently, come scholars (cf. Epstein and Deely(1999), Castillo, Drury, and Grohmann(1999), Martin(1999), Boeckx(2000), B??skovi´c(2001)) argue that the EPP effect can be derived from Case checking, and that the EPP can be eliminated. Lasnik (2001) argues, however, that the EPP cannot be a matter of feature checking. On the basis of Lasnik's argument, I have tried to illustrate that the EPP effect cannot be derived from Case checking. With several theoretical and empirical considerations, I conclude that the EPP is still the most adequate description about the requirement that a clause must have a subject, even though there remains a problem to declare why such a requirement exists. (Kongju National University)

      • KCI등재

        On the Surface Position of an ECM Subject

        김연승 한국생성문법학회 2011 생성문법연구 Vol.21 No.4

        The purpose of this paper is to argue that an ECM subject is in the adjoined position to the matrix VP in its surface string. There have been two main approaches to the ECM subject position: covert raising and overt raising. Each approach has some problems. Considering those problems, I conclude that the overt raising approach is the better one. It will be illustrated why an ECM subject overtly raises into the matrix clause and how Case checking is done for the satisfaction of two conditions: adjacency and c-command. These accounts make it possible for Case to be checked uniformly via Agree, making SHA unnecessary. I have tried to justify these accounts by illustrating the difference in Case checking between normal ECM constructions and there constructions.

      • KCI등재

        Smoldering 연소로 인한 화재사고 조사보고 소개 및 이론적 해석

        김연승,변영철,황정호 한국화재소방학회 1999 한국화재소방학회논문지 Vol.10 No.4

        산호제의 양이 충분치 못한 밀폐된 공간에서는 화재가 발생하지 않으리라는 기대를 깨고, 다공성 물질내부에서 공극안에 있는 산화제를 이용하여 서서히 연소되는 smoldering 반응을 통하여 대형 화재가 발생할 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 하나의 실제 화재 사건을 화재 조사 방법에 의하여 기술한 보고서를 바탕으로 하여 smoldering 연소가 화재의 발생에 미치는 영향을 예시하였으며, 예시된 사고의 smoldering 연소를 강제대류에 의한 하향식 역방향 smoldering으로 모델링하였다. 화학반응으로는 열분해가 없는 1 단계 반응이 채택되어, 온도 및 산화제의 공간적 분포와 smoldering의 전파속도를 수치적으로 모사하였다. 수치결과로서 유입되는 산화제의 양과 연료의 공극률이 반응지역의 전파속도를 결정하는 가장 우세한 인자로 파악되었다. 그러므로 smoldering 에 의한 화재 발생시 유입되는 산화제의 양과 연료의 공극률과의 관계를 알고 있다면 주어진 연료의 공극률에 대하여 유입되는 산화제의 양을 제어함으로써 불길로의 천이를 억제할 수 있음을 제시하고 있다. Smoldering is a non-flaming combustion mode, characterized by thermal degradation and c charring of the virgin material, evolution of smoke and emission of visible glow. A big fire may @ occur even in a confined environment having a limited amount of oxygen, due to smoldering c combustion through a porous solid material. This paper presents a theoretical analysis on the effect of smoldering combustion on fire occurrence based on a report about fire investigation of a real f fire accident. It is assumed that the propagation of the smolder wave is one-dimensional, d downward, opposing an upward forced flow and steady in a frame of reference moving with the s smolder wave. Smoldering combustion is modeled by a one-step reaction mechanism, without c considering pyrolysis. It is found that dominant parameters controlling smoldering combustion i include mass flux of oxidizer entering the reaction zone and void fraction of solid fuel. It is also found that the mechanism of transition to flaming is critically influenced by these two parameters.

      • KCI등재

        On Case Checking in There-Constructions

        김연승 한국생성문법학회 2004 생성문법연구 Vol.14 No.4

        In this paper it is proposed that there is merged on vP-SPEC; that there inherits an uninterpretable Case feature to be checked via linking to the associate; and that linking between there and the associate must be done in the same vP. Under these proposals Agree can still be maintained as a proper mechanism of feature checking in there constructions. It is easily accounted for why an NP argument on TP-SPEC is ambiguous between the specific and the unspecific reading whereas an NP argument in the corresponding there constructions has only the unspecific reading. It is also systematically accounted for why a raised subject can antecede an anaphor or license a polarity item in the higher clause, whereas the associate of a raised expletive cannot. Moreover, nothing need be said concerning the relative cheapness of Merge over Move.

      • KCI등재후보

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼