http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
구종남 대한언어학회 1999 언어학 Vol.7 No.1
Koo, Jong-Nam. 1999. On the Connective Endings '-ilk'εmi', '-ingεmi' in some Dialects. Linguistics, 7-1, 243-265. This paper aims to explore the morphological structures and the meanings of '-ilk'εmi' and '-ingεmi' which are used as connective endings in dialects. By some morphological, syntactic and semantic evidences this paper concludes that '-ilk'εmi', '-ingε mi' had been made by '-ilk'a(interrogative ending) + ha(auxiliary verb) + m(nominalizer) + c(postposition)' and '-inga(interrogative ending) + ha(auxiliary verb) + m(nominalizer) + ε(postposition)' structure respectively, through fusion. And it was revealed that '-llk'εmi' has the meaning of 'connective doubtful reason' and '-ingεmi' has the meaning of 'doubtful reason'. (Chonbuk University)
구종남 한민족어문학회 2011 韓民族語文學 Vol.0 No.59
본고에서는 국어 부정극어(negative polarity item)의 허가자에 무엇이 있으며 어떤 원리로 부정극어를 허락하는지를 밝히려고 시도했다. 명시적인 부정 문맥은 모든 부정극어들이 허용되는 공통 조건이다. 국어에서 명시적 부정문은 '안', '못', '-지 않다', '-지 못하다', '말다', '모르다', '없다'에 의해 이루어진 문장이다. 그런데 ‘-기 싫(어하)다’, ‘-기 어렵다’, ‘-기 힘들다’, ‘거절하다’, ‘-기 전에', '-면', ‘-느니/기보다', 성분 부정, 수사의문문 등 비명시적 부정 문맥을 이루는 표현들이 또한 일부 부정극어를 허가한다. 본고에서는 기왕에 제시되었던 부정극어 허가자에 대한 여러 가지 허가 이론을 살펴보고 비명시적인 문맥에서 허가되는 부정극어 허가자의 특징과 허가 양상을 살펴보았다. 국어의 비명시적 부정극어 허가자 중 '-기 전에', '-느니/기보다'는 반형태함수였으며 나머지는 반부가함수였다. 그리고 '-기 싫어하다', '-기 거절하다', '-기 전에'는 반진정적 운용소이고 '-기 어렵다', '-느니/기보다', '-면', 수사의문문 '-기 힘들다'는 비진정적 운용소였다. 따라서 국어 부정극어는 반부가 함수, 비진정적 운용소 이상에서 허가된다고 할 수 있다. This paper is to analyze the licensors of negative polarity items based on monotonicity theory and nonveridicality theory. For this purpose I studied these theories firstly, and examined the NPIs in Korean by these theories. In addition to negative sentences which are made by explicit negatives 'ahn', 'mos', 'malda', '-ji anhta', '-ji mothada', 'eopsda', 'moreuda', there are several unexplicit NPI licensors like '-gi silheohada', '-gi eoryupda', '-gi jeone' '-myeon', '-gi geojeolhada', 'constituent negation, -neuni/giboda', rhetorical questions. The unexplicit NPI licensors all have anti-additivity and veridiaclity. Especially '-gi jeone' is anti-additivitve and antiveridical. So it licenses the strong NPI 'amwudo'. Almost all the NPIs are licensed by anti-additivitve function, but '- bakke' is permitted by anti -morphic function 'ahn', 'mos', '-ji anhta', '-ji mothada'.
구종남 대한언어학회 1999 언어학 Vol.7 No.3
Koo, Jong-Nam. 1999. On the Discourse 'eodi'. Linguistics 7-3, 217-234. This paper aims to examine the characteristics of 'eodi'(where) and discuss the grammaticalizational principle and discourse functions of 'eodi' in korean. 'Eodi' is used as a interrogative and indefinite pronoun originally. But it is used as a discourse marker. There exist 8 evidences that 'eodi' is used as a discourse marker. This paper argued that 'eodi' had been grammaticalized as a discourse marker through the conext-induced reinterpretation in discourse. And 10 discourse functions of 'eodi' were discussed. (Chonbuk National University)
국어 부정의문문에 대한 응답 방식 연구 : 통계적 접근연구의 목적
구종남 국어국문학회 2004 국어국문학 Vol.- No.136
The aim of this thesis is to review the answer style to the negative questions in statistical method. I divided negative questions into neutral and non-neutral one and made questionnaires that include negative questions in which contained verb and copula respectively. For the negative questions which contains verb, I made the video tape. The data were collected from 49 university students. The results of the data analysis are followings. First, ‘eung’(yes), ‘ani’(no) are not complete as answers in negative sentences, especially in non-neutral sentences. Second, the difference between neutral questions and non-neutral questions are not recognized clearly in verb questions, but it was recognized in copular questions. Third, the difference between neutral and non-neutral negative questions are more clearly recognized in video tape than in paper questionnaires.