http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
장윤배(Yoon-Bae Chang),이훈,좌승희 경기연구원 2007 경기개발연구원 기본연구 Vol.2007 No.11
In the surrounding area near the cultural assets, the construction, building and something affecting to the preservation of the historic monuments are possible only when they get the legal permission of the Cultural Properties Protection Committee that is set up by the Cultural Properties Protection Law. As the result of the legal process, the historical monuments have been recognized as the obstruction against the development of the concerned regions. At the times of the renovation in Gyeonggi province, we need to take a proper step that enable us to take the historical monuments not as the hinderance against development but as the golden advantage by using them appropriately. In this study, through synthesizing the cultural assets protection policy and urban planning process, we intend to foster proper measures that can enable us to harmonize building control with historical monuments. The building control near the historical monuments had been specified on the building law before. However, since the deliberation system controlling the surrounding area near the cultural assets has been introduced, the building control near cultural monuments is being prescribed on the Cultural Properties Protection Law. In Gyeonggi province, there are 734 national historical monuments and 524 regional historical monuments. Through examining the results about the applications for the building permission near the historical monuments, the permission rate by the Cultural Properties Protection Committee was only 35 %. In the aspects of the causes for nonpermissions, the committee are indicating the reservation of landscape as the justification for the nonpermissions. Therefore, we can easily know that the purpose of building control near the historical monuments is extended to the protection of landscape in the surrounding area of the cultural assets. The problems that we want to point out for the deliberation system controlling the surrounding area near the cultural assets are as follows. Firstly, the deliberation system is too leaning toward to legal regulations. Secondly, the permission yardsticks used in the deliberation are some uniformally standardizations without consideration for the characteristic locations of the respective monuments. Thirdly, the building control system is only for the monuments themselves, not considering how the concerned area near the historical monuments should be developed. Fourthly, there is not any financial support or any tax favor that should be properly given to the owners of lands and buildings near the monuments. About the deliberation system controlling the surrounding area near the cultural assets, the improvements we want to suggest are as follows. ○ Understanding correctly the historical monuments We need to give the person to understand that the cultural assets are not obstructions against the development but the opportunities for the development and economical growth by informing the examples of the advanced nations such as France and Italy. ○ Establishing supporting system for the surrounding area We need to compensate appropriately the building owners in the concerned area for the building regulations. ○ Establishing the special law for supporting Historical landscape We need to integrate the urban planning process and cultural assets protections policy. In addition, We suggest the special law in which the financial support and substantial land use can be realized. ○ Formulating the masterplan for conservation of Cultural assets In Gyeonggi province and self-government bodies, we should formulate the masterplan for the development of the concerned area and the historical monument. In addition, we need to make a specific urban-planning measures for the development of the surrounding area ○ Harmonizing the control to the urban planning measures If it is impossible for us to formulate the masterplan, the delibera
장윤배(Chang, Yoon-Bae),이주아(Lee, Joo-Ah),강성익(Kang, Sung-Ik),이훈(Lee, Hoon) SH도시연구원 2017 주택도시연구 Vol.7 No.3
To draw policy implications for rational operation of the upper FAR, this study examines the FAR standards of the apartment reconstruction projects of each local governments in Gyeonggi province and analyzes the level of the FAR standards considering the characteristics of local government and regional characteristic. On the basis of research purpose, this study set up indicators to evaluate the FAR standard level of the apartment reconstruction projects by local governments, and quantitatively evaluated them in terms of revitalization of reconstruction projects, prevention of monopolization of real estate development profits, and balanced development of regions. As a research method, this study used the FGI(Focus Group Interview) to set the FAR evaluation criteria and to classify the weights of the criteria through the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) analysis method. Based on the derived criteria and weights, this study compares the FAR standards of 31 local governments in Gyeonggi Province by the aspects of regional equity and apartment reconstruction. As a result, this study revealed the areas where it is necessary to regulate the FAR standards somewhat because the areas are easy to secure the feasibility of reconstruction projects compared to other regions. The analysis also reveals areas where voluntary reconstruction projects occurring by FAR mitigation is expected to proceed. In addition, the results of the analysis show areas where the FAR standard needs to be relaxed in terms of regional equity.
이외희(Way Lee),이성룡(Seong-Ryong Lee),김제국(Je-Kook Kim),강식(Sik Kang),이상규(Sang-Kyu Lee),장윤배(Yoon-Bae Chang),봉인식(In-Shik Pong),김태경(Tae-Kyung Kim) 경기연구원 2006 경기논단 Vol.8 No.2
The main stream of urban and regional planning in the next five years in Gyeonggi Province may not be very different from the past. These are the deregulation of the capital areas, the development of western coast for the competition of the capital areas, the strategic development of the northern part of Gyeonggi Province in terms of the unification of Korea, and the sustainable development and conservation of eastern Gyeonggi Province for the protection of drinking water. Some other predictable issues for the next five years are residential development with regarding to the planning aspects, the quality of residential areas, housing affordability and the environmental quality in the residential areas released from greenbelt. An upcoming issue is that a plan should be prepared before public institutions are moved according to the development of administration-city. These issues are discussed in the seven sectors in this paper such as the policies of the capital areas, housing, urban planning, and urban design, etc.