정체성을 기르는 싱가포르 역사교육의 시민교육 성격

김한종 ( Kim Han-jong ) 역사교육학회 2018 역사교육논집 Vol.67 No.-

History education plays an important role as civic education in Singapore. Citizenship pursed through history education is not focused on pluralistic thinking and universal value of mankind, but on identification of Singapore nation people. So, syllabi of Singapore history subject are mainly composed of Singapore nation's historical changes and the process of independent Singapore, along with effects which making on Singapore people's lives. These syllabi reflect the characteristic of Singapore history education more emphasizing identification than multi-perspective. But such the identification embraces self-identity or internationality as well as national identity. Singapore history education does not support the exclusiveness against other nation or the passive contact with global world in this sense. Singapore history curriculum presents inquiry method as the strategy of learning history, lays stress on the social critical mind and encourages historical imagination and empathy for understanding the historical mind and reason. This national history curriculum aims at students' having identification with historical agents. The characteristic of civic education in Singapore history education is different from the general nature of democratic civic education, focusing on social values such as freedom, equality, peace and human right and emphasizing mutual understanding and multi-perspective. But it has considerable suggestions on Korean history education that Singapore history education is concerned in social problems causing conflicts in people's relationships and has the stress on developing students' critical thinking through which helps to solve those problems.

Libraries for Life: A Case Study of National Library Board, Singapore

Schubert Foo,Chris Tang,Judy Ng 한국문헌정보학회 2010 한국문헌정보학회지 Vol.44 No.4

Library 2.0 advocates a socially rich, multimedia enabled, user originated and communally innovative environment that poses significant opportunities for the libraries to evolve and make themselves even more relevant and significant for her users. This paper presents a case study of the National Library Board of Singapore, in playing a vital role to facilitate the realisation of a long-term key national program, The Singapore Memory (SM) Project. SM embraces the attributes of the Library 2.0 environment to enable the nation’s memory to be collected, organised, preserved, discovered, researched, augmented and created. The output of is an evolving collection of knowledge assets on Singapore along a Singapore Memory Content Continuum of existing content that is steadily augmented with new content. The content will be collected across all formats, in any language, from Singaporeans and non-Singaporeans, from any institution and agency, from Singapore and abroad, and from official and unofficial sources. The utopian scenario of SM Project is that any person, community, group or institution who has ever experienced Singapore in any way or has any material on Singapore will engage actively in the contribution, discovery and creation of content for the project, and thus become advocates to further encourage and catalyse more contribution, discovery and creation. The paper outlines the key approaches, concepts and ideas for the project. An important element is the proliferation, exposure and accessibility of the rich contents envisaged in the project. The SM proliferation plan along with examples of how two existing resources, namely, the Singapore Infopedia, a database of articles on Singapore’s history, culture, people and events and NewspaperSG, an online resource of current and historic Singapore and Malayan newspapers, have been designed are presented to demonstrate how content can be exposed, searched and discovered.

미·중 세력균형의 중심적 동학: 중국의 부상(浮上)과 싱가포르 전략균형 과제

정혜영 원광대학교 한중관계연구원 2019 韓中關係硏究 Vol.5 No.3

Early on, the Chinese government focused on the growth strategies of Singapore. And actively sought to learn the growth know-how of Singapore. After all, China achieved their dream through the transplantation of its development model of Singapore. Xi Jin Ping’s leadership also has been deeply committed to learning Singapore’s strong social operating system and national policy system. This paper focuses on growth strategy of Singapore, that allowed Singapore to move out of the “Four Asian Dragons” position which is deepening its relationship through close communication and mutually beneficial cooperation. Meanwhile, the deepening of bilateral relations is accompanied by another challenges of Singapore, which has been engaged in non-aligned neutral diplomacy for the balance of US-Chinese forces in Southeast Asia. This study focused on Singapore’s foreign strategy to China, which is its exploring the strategic balancing of Singapore that has deeply influenced on the balance of power in Southeast Asia. In the face of China’s rise in East Asia and the US-China confrontation, the paper will look at the challenges of Singapore’s foreign policy in terms of the strategy balancing, the global value chain of the Singapore economy to China, balanced diplomacy in the South China Sea and China & Singapore’s BRI cooperation. 본 연구는 동아시아에서 부상하고 있는 중국과 그 관계가 심화된 싱가포르 대외정책에 초점을 맞춘 연구이다. 싱가포르는 동남아 미­중 세력균형의 중심적 동학이면서도, 중국­아세안 관계에 깊은 영향을 미쳐왔다. 싱가포르의 대외정책인 전략균형 속에서 ‘싱가포르­중국’의 관계는 중요한 한 축이 되어왔다. 중국의 영향력이 동아시아 확대되고 있는 시기, 싱가포르 전략균형의 과제에도 중국과 심화된 관계문제가 주요한 과제로 떠올랐다. 본 논문에서는 ‘싱가포르가 중국과 심화된 관계를 유지하면서 대외정책인 전략균형을 지속시키며 중립성을 유지 할 수 있는가?’ 라는 연구 질문을 바탕으로, 동아시아 국제관계의 구조적 변화가 불러오는 싱가포르의 대외정책 과제를 ‘싱가포르-중국관계’ 중심으로 연구하고자 하였다. 논문에서는 싱가포르가 ‘아시아 4 마리 용’의 지위를 벗어날 수 있었던 발전 동력과 그 전략성에 주목하였고, 중국의 성장기조에 싱가포르가 함께 한 측면에 초점을 맞추었다. 그리고 심화된 양국관계와 이로 인한 싱가포르 ‘중립성’이 지닌 도전과제들을 연구하였다. 양국의 우호적인 협력기조와 발전전략은 양국관계를 경제와 정치방면에서 동시 심화시켰으며, 싱가포르의 국가위상과 발전에도 중요한 영향을 미쳤다. 그러나 양국관계 심화 이면에는 동남아 지역의 미-중 세력균형을 위하여 비동맹 중립외교를 수행해온 싱가포르의 도전과제도 병존한다. 논문에서는 중국의 동아시아 부상과 미-중 대결이라는 외부 환경변화를 맞이한 싱가포르 대외정책의 도전과제들을 싱가포르의 전략균형, 싱가포르경제의 대중국 글로벌 가치사슬, 남중국해에서의 균형외교, 일대일로 협력과제의 측면에서 살펴본다.

50년의 역사, 200년의 역사, 700년의 역사 - ‘이민국가’ 싱가포르의 건국사, 식민사, 21세기 고대사

김종호(Kim JongHo) 경북대학교 인문학술원 2019 동서인문 Vol.0 No.12

싱가포르는 1819년 영국 동인도 회사의 스탬포드 래플스에 의해 항구 도시로 근대화된 이래 200년 동안 이주민인 중국인과 인도인이 인구 구성의 80%가 넘는 대표적인 이민국가이다. 그러나 중국의 굴기라고 하는 국제정치적 환경과 내부 다양한 인종간 내셔널리즘 이식이라고 하는 내부적 과제 사이에서 이민국가로써 생존을 모색해야 할 상황에 처해 있다. 그 가운데에서도 싱가포르 역사서술은 싱가포르 국민들 사이의 동질감, 소속감을 강하게 느끼게 해 줄 수 있는 가장 효과적인 매개체임에는 분명 하지만, 지금까지 200년에 불과한 ‘식민사’라는 싱가포르 역사의 한계가 내셔널리즘의 고취에 큰 장애가 된 것 역시 사실이다. 그러나 다인종·다문화 국민국가로 50년의 공화국을 영위해온 싱가포르는 최근 식민지 이전 시기로까지 그 역사서술의 영역을 넓힘으로써 싱가포르 역사의 다양함과 다이나믹함을 강조하려 하고 있다. 특히 학계뿐 아니라 정부 차원에서 1819년 이전 1300년대부터 존재했던 테마섹(Temasek) 시기 싱가포르의 역사를 고고학을 중심으로 재구성하고, 대중들에게 알리려고 노력 하고 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 싱가포르 역사 속 200년, 50년, 700년의 의미를 짚어보고, 이민국가 싱가포르의 21세기 고대사 만들기가 디아스포라 연구에 어떠한 가능성을 가져다 줄 수 있을 것인지 고찰해 보고자 한다. This paper aims at finding a new possibility of diaspora studies through Singapore case, a nation-state which consists of eighty percent’s Chinese population. In shaping Singaporean nationalism, the rise of China, home country of Chinese Singaporean, as a global power matters through diverse aspects such as South China Sea conflicts, One Belt and One Road Initiative, Sino-US competition. Due to the geopolitical location of Singapore in Southeast Asia and its composition of population, Singapore recently is forced to take side of China as a Chinese descendants-established country. Singapore society has reacted to this external pressure and been concerned about the future of Singapore as a diasporic community in various dimensions. Studying history is one of those movements. Singapore history has been regarded by many Singaporeans as ‘nothing to remember’ or just colonial history because its history began with the founding of the British East India Company in 1819. It has been studied and believed by the academia and the public that Singapore history only lasted 200 years without any meaningful historical issues during the pre-colonial Temasek, an old name of Singapore island. However, it is clear that this kind of historical perspective on Singapore past would be a great obstacle to bind diverse origin’s Singaporean citizens into a single nation-state. This is the major issue in Singapore society, which politicians and historians of Singapore recently point out. To solve this problem, many scholars launch historical projects on covering Temasek period from 1300s as Singapore pre-colonial history. In particular, some archaeological researches only focusing on Singapore’s pre-colonial era from 1300s to 1819 found that before the British coming, Malays, Chinese, Orang Raut(sea people) had lived together in Singapore island through trading. It means that Singapore region has not found and developed firstly by the British but shaped their own political, social, economic community until colonized by the East India Company. Moreover, ISEAS-Yusof Bin Ishak Institute, a leading national research institute concentrating on Southeast Asia recent issues, established “Temasek History Research Center” to increase interests of archaeological finding in Singapore and distribute its achievements to the public. Making 700 years’ Singapore history show us the diaspora group’s new way of transforming ‘host country’ to ‘home country’

글로벌 도시국가 싱가포르의 한인사회 : ‘이주’와 ‘정착’의 역사 및 전망

이승은 동덕여자대학교 한중미래연구소 2014 한중미래연구 Vol.2 No.-

싱가포르 한인 이주 역사 50주년을 맞이하여, 본 논문은 싱가포르 한인 사회 의 역사를 재조명하며 한인 사회의 현황 및 전망을 살펴보고자 한다. 본 연구는 싱가포르 한인 사회의 괄목할만한 수적 증가와 비자 종류 및 기타 통계자료를 토 대로 한인 사회를 고찰해보고자 하는 시론적 연구이다. 동남아시아에 위치한 도시국가인 싱가포르는, 2011년 12월 통계에 따르면, 전체 인구가 총 518만 명으로, 싱가포르 국민이 327만 명, 영주권 소지자가 54 만 명, 나머지 인구인 외국인이 146만 명을 차지한다.1965년 싱가포르 한인회 가 발족한 이래, 싱가포르의 한인사회는 급속도로 성장하였으며, 싱가포르에 거 주하는 한국인의 숫자는 현재 25,000 여 명 정도로 추산된다. 싱가포르의 한국 인은 회사원, 자영업자, 유학생 등 다양한 직업을 가지고, 여러 비자형태로 분화 되어있으며, 회사원의 비율이 40-45%에 가까운 것으로 나타났다. 현지정부의 고용비자 정책은, 급여에 따라 발급받을 수 있는 비자의 종류가 결정되며, 이는 한국인의 비자 형태를 결정짓는 주요원인 중 하나이다. 싱가포르의 국가적·지리적 특성상 외국인이나 이주민에게 있어서 싱가포르는 ‘정착 하는’ 국가가 아닌 ‘잠시 머물러가는’ 장소로 한인동포들에게 인식이 되어왔으며, 영주 권 획득 증가 추세와 함께, 젊은 세대들이 싱가포르에 머물 것인지, 싱가포르와 현지에 서의 경험을 기반으로 더욱더 모바일한 개체가 될 것인지에 대한 시사점을 제공한다. In accordance with the 50th anniversary of Koreans migration to Singapore, this paper traces the historical trajectory of South Koreans in Singapore and examines the situation of South Koreans living in Singapore. Singapore is a city-state located in Southeast Asia. According to the recent statistics, the Singapore’s population is 518 million. This includes 327 million Singapore citizens, 54 million Permanent Residents, and 146 million foreign nationals. Since the Korean Association in Singapore was found in 1965, the Korean society in the city-state is rapidly growing. It is estimated that now around 25,000 Koreans live in the country. While office workers take up about 40-45 percent of the whole Korean population, students, self-employed and other type of residents exist. The Singaporean government’s employment visa policy is on a salary basis; hence, visa types that foreigners can obtain are accordingly decided. The sharp increase in the number of Koreans in Singapore, visa types and other reliable sources, this paper explores the Korean society in Singapore. By its geographical and national characteristic, Koreans regard Singapore as a place for a “permanent settlement” but a “temporal” place. With the increase of obtaining the Permanent Residentship, this paper offers insights of whether younger Korean generations choose to live in Singapore or become a more “mobile” entity on the basis of experiences in Singapore.

싱가포르의 사법개혁에 관한 연구

김정환 ( Kim Junghwan ) 사법정책연구원 2022 연구보고서 Vol.2022 No.18

국제적으로 싱가포르 사법부는 청렴하고, 중립적이며, 효율적으로 재판을 진행한다고 알려져 있다. 싱가포르 사법부에 대한 싱가포르 국민의 신뢰 또한 높은 편인데, 이는 2020년에 싱가포르 하급법원(State Courts)에서 시행한 대국민 인식조사에서 잘 나타나고 있다. 다만 싱가포르 사법부가 항상 이와 같은 긍정적 평가를 받아왔던 것은 아니며, 1980년대 후반까지 싱가포르 사법부는 사건 지연과 비효율적인 사법행정, 법원에의 접근 제한 등의 문제를 안고 있었을 뿐만 아니라 사법부에 대한 대국민 신뢰도 또한 그리 높지 못한 상황이었다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 다양한 조치가 시행되었으나 그리 성공적인 결과를 거두지는 못하였고, 결국 싱가포르 사법부는 1990년대에 이전에 시행되었던 여러 조치의 문제점을 분석한 후 새로운 접근방법에 근거한 사법개혁 조치를 다시 시행하는데, 이때 실시한 사법개혁 조치의 여러 긍정적 효과는 싱가포르 사법부의 체질을 바꿔 현재와 같은 우수한 평가를 받는 싱가포르 사법부의 초석을 다졌다는 평가를 받는다. 본 연구보고서는 싱가포르 사법부가 1980년대까지 지속되었던 문제 상황을 해결하고, 효율적이면서도 높은 평가를 받는 사법부로 탈바꿈하기 시작한, 1990년대에 행해졌던 싱가포르의 사법개혁을 그 주된 분석의 대상으로 삼아 싱가포르 사법개혁 전반에 대해 살펴본 후 우리에게 싱가포르의 사법개혁이 어떤 시사점을 줄 수 있는지 살펴보는 것을 그 목적으로 한다. 구체적으로는 싱가포르 사법부에 대한 개괄적 설명에서부터 시작하여 사법개혁의 원인이 되었던 문제 상황에 대한 서술, 1990년대 사법개혁 이전에 행해졌던 싱가포르 사법부의 여러 조치에 대한 분석, 1990년대에 행해진 사법개혁의 특징과 핵심전략 및 사법개혁의 목표와 수단, 그 효과 등에 대해 분석한다. 다음으로는 싱가포르의 사법개혁이 가지는 특성을 분석하고, 마지막으로는 싱가포르의 사법개혁이 우리에게 어떤 시사점을 줄 수 있는지에 대해 다루어보고자 한다. Singapore's judiciary is internationally well-known for its integrity, impartiality, and efficiency in its trials. Singaporeans' trust in the Singapore judiciary is also high, which is well reflected in the public perception survey conducted by the State Courts of Singapore in 2020. However, the Singapore judiciary has not always received such positive views. Until the late 1980s, the Singapore judiciary not only had issues such as backlogs, inefficient judicial administration, and limited access to courts, but also the citizens’ trust in the judiciary was not very high. Various measures were implemented to solve these issues, but with little success. After analyzing the problems of several measures previously implemented in the 1990s, the Singapore judiciary re-implemented judicial reform measures based on a new approach. It is evaluated that many positive effects of the judicial reform measures implemented at this time have changed the institutional nature of the Singapore judiciary and laid the foundation for the Singapore judiciary to now be highly regarded. This research report takes Singapore's judicial reform as the main subject of analysis and aims to explore in general Singapore's judicial reform carried out in the 1990s, when the Singapore judiciary began to address problems that persisted through the 1980s and transform itself into an efficient and highly regarded judiciary, and then examine what implications Singapore’s judicial reform can give us. Specifically, this report begins with an overview of the Singapore judiciary, then describes the problematic circumstances that led to judicial reform; analyzes the measures taken by the Singapore judiciary prior to judicial reform in the 1990s; analyzes the characteristics and core strategies of judicial reform carried out during the 1990s, the goals and means of the judicial reform, and its effects. In addition, this report analyzes the characteristics of Singapore's judicial reform and concludes with a discussion on what implications those judicial reforms might suggest for us.

발전 속의 저발전 : 싱가포르 동남아연구 발전사

이상국 ( Sang Kook Lee ) 한국동남아학회 2010 동남아시아연구 Vol.20 No.3

Southeast Asian studies in Singapore has had a problem with locating local scholarship from the outset. The initiation of English-track scholarship was done by British scholars while Chinese scholars in the beginning were not considered as local people but as sojourners who identified China as their fatherland. If the latter had successfully located their scholarship in the post-colonial environment of Singapore, the job of identifying local scholarship would have been much easier. Indeed, for some time in the 1960s-70s, there existed a relatively strong local scholarship that was based mainly at Nanyang University. However, they became marginalized as English became dominant not just in education but also in Singapore society. Unlike the Chinese-track scholarship, the English-track scholarship in Singapore has developed greatly over the years. The establishment of ISEAS was the crystallized form of Singapore`s endeavors to develop a Singapore brand of Southeast Asian studies to the world. Alongside ISEAS, NUS has carried on the English-track Southeast Asian studies and become a world-class university in this academic field. The formation of the Southeast Asian Programme and ARI marked a cornerstone for NUS in advancing Southeast Asian studies. However, Singaporean scholarship continues to be weak in comparison to foreign scholarship. In the absence of strong local scholarship, the typical way in which Singapore has chosen to develop Southeast Asian studies has been to establish world-class institutes and to bring in foreign talents. This strategy has perhaps paid off since it has situated Singapore as the prime place where scholars gather, information goes around and quality research outcomes are published. However, whether or not it has strengthened local scholarship remains a controversial issue. The dominant contribution of foreign scholars continues to pose the problem of whether the ownership of Southeast Asian studies in Singapore belongs to Singapore itself. The identification of scholarship in Singapore is an unsettled matter.

싱가포르의 분쟁해결문화와 ADR제도

정용균 한국무역통상학회 2019 무역통상학회지 Vol.19 No.1

Singapore has witnessed rapid economic growths for a couple of decades due to the inward foreign direct investment. To accomplish this purpose, Singapore tries to transform a small island into the international business hub in East Asia. Concomitantly, Singapore government implements strategy to construct this country as the international dispute resolution hub during last couple of decades. In line with this strategy, Singapore has established Singaporian dispute resolution system, such as Singapore court annexed mediation system, Community Resolution Center, Singapore Mediation Center(SMC), Singapore International Mediation Center(SMIC), Singapore International Mediation Institute(SIMI), Singapore International Arbitration Centre(SIAC), and Singapore International Commercial Court(SICC). Furthermore, Singapore provides an unique Arb-Med-Arb service to disputants. The spectrum of dispute resolution institutions indicates that Singapore is expected to implement a vision of multi-door court house in Singapore.

패드라 브랑카(싱가포르)/플라우 바투 푸티로(말레이시아) 도서 영유권 분쟁에 대한 국제법적 평석

이장희 ( Jang Hie Lee ) 고려대학교 법학연구원 2009 고려법학 Vol.0 No.52

This article treats Territorial Title Disputes over Pedra Branca (Malysia)/Pulau Batu Puteh(Singapore) & Its International legal Comments. This Article divided into six parts: Preamble, Facts Findings, Legal issues of two parties, Contents of judgements & its analysi, International Legal comments and its implications for Dokdo Issue. The main subject matter of the disputes is a small island called Pedra Branca(Malysia)/Pulau Batu Puteh(Singapore) situated in the middle of the Straights of Singapore at entrance to the South China. Pedra Branca has been part of Singapore`s territory since the 1840s. On 21 December 1979, Malaysia published a map entitled "Territorial Waters and Continental Shelf Boundaries of Malaysia". By this map, Malaysia purported to include Pedra Branca within Malaysia`s territorial waters. Singapore duly lodged a protest with Malaysia against this paper claim on 14 February 1980. By a special Agreement dated 6 February 2003 and notified to the court on 24 July 2003, Malaysia and Singapore agreed to submitted the above dispute to the court. By article 2 of the special Agreement, the court is requested to determine whether sovereignty over (1)Petra Branca/Pualu Batu Puteh, (2) Middle Rocks, (3) South Ledge, belongs to Malaysia or the Republic of Singapore. The Special Agreement does not request the court to enter into an exercise of delimitation or to make declarations concerning fishing or other economic rights. Arguments of the parties as follows: Malaysia has an original title to Petra Branca of long standing. Petra Branca is and has always been, part of the Malaysia State of Johor. Nothing has happened to displace Malaysia`s sovereignty over it. Singapore`s presence on the island for the sole purpose of constructing and maintaining a lighthouse there-with the permission of the territorial sovereign-is insufficient to vest sovereignty in it. Singapore sums up its positions as follows: 1) The selection of Pedra Branca as the site for building of the lighthouse with the authorization of the British Crown constituted a classic taking of possession a tire de souverain. 2) Title was acquired by the British Crown in accordance with the legal principles governing acquisition of territory in 1847-1851. 3) The Title acquired in 1847-1851 has been maintained by the British Crown and Uts lawful successor, the Republic of Singapore. At the stage of oral pleadings Singapore also referred to the legal status of Pedra Branca as terra nullius. In his statement, the Agent of Singapore as follows: "Singapore`s title to Pedra Branca is based upon the taking of lawful posessuion of the island by the British Authorities in Singapore during the period 1847 to 1851. Malay claims that, prior to 1847, Pedra Branca was under the sovereignty of Johor. However, there is absolutely no evidence to support Malaysia`s claim. Mr. President, the truth is that, prior to 1847, Pedra Branca was terra nullius, and had never been the subject of a prior claim, or any manifestation of sovereignty entity". The Question to which the court must now respond is whether in the light of the principles and rules of international law it stated earlier and of the assessment it has undertaken of the relevant facts, particularly the conduct of the Parties sovereignty over Pedra Branca passed to the United kingdom or Singapore. The conduct of the United Kingdom and Singapore was, in many respects, conduct as operator of Horsburgh lighthouse, but that was not the case in all respects. Without being exhaustive, the court recalls their investigation of marine accidents, their control over visits, Singapore`s installation of naval communication equipment and its reclamation plans, all of which respond in any way to that conduct, or the other conduct that charcter identified earlier in this judgement, of all which it had notice. Further, the Johor authorities and their successors took no action at all on Pedra Branca from June 1850 for the whole of the following century or more. It is the clearly stated position of Acting Secretary of the State of Johor in 1953 that Johor dis not claim ownership of Pedra Branca. That ststement has major significance. The Court is of opinion that the relevant facts, including the conduct of the Parties, previously reviewed and summarized in two preceeding paragraps, reflect a convergent evolution of the positions of the Parties regarding title to Pedra Branca. The court concludes, especially by reference to the conduct of Singapore and its predecessors a titre de souvran, taken toghther with the conduct of Malaysia and its predecessors including their failure to respond to the conduct of Singapore and its predecessors, that by 1980 sovereignty over Pedra Branca had passed to Singapore. For that above reasons, the court concludes that sovereignty over Pedra Branca belongs to Singapore. This PB judgement implies that the burden of proof in territorial disputes would be vital to decision of ICJ for the Dokdo territorial issue in the future.

미국의 양적완화 이후 싱가포르의 대미 수출경쟁력의 변화분석

김태헌 ( Tae-heon Kim ) 한국질서경제학회 2013 질서경제저널 Vol.16 No.4

본고에서는 미국의 QE1~QE4가 싱가포르와 미국의 쌍무무역에 어떠한 영향을 미쳤는지, 특히 양적완화 이후 싱가포르의 대미 수출경쟁력이 어떻게 변화하였는지를 사후적 관점에서 분석하고 있다. 분석은 양적완화 실시 전후인 2005년에서 2012까지 8년간의 환율 및 무역시계열통계를 이용하였으며 TSI, RCA, CAC 지수분석법을 활용하였다. TSI분석결과, 싱가포르 10대 수출품목의 절반에서 TSI가 악화되었고 다른 절반에서는 TSI가 개선된 것으로 나타나 미국의 QE가 싱가포르 10대 수출품의 국제특화지수에 부정적 영향을 미쳤는지는 명확하게 확인할 수 없었다. 이에 반하여 미국은 QE 실시 이후 8개 품목에서 TSI가 전반적으로 개선된 것으로 나타났다. RCA 지수 분석에서는 싱가포르의 경우 QE 실시후 3개 품목에서 RCA 지수가 작아졌을 뿐, 7개 품목은 오히려 RCA 지수가 개선된 것으로 나타났다. 반면 미국은 QE에도 불구하고 2개 품목에서 RCA 지수가 개선되었을 뿐, 전반적인 수출품목에서는 약보합세를 유지하거나 더 열악해지는 등 QE의 영향력이 미치지 못한 것으로 나타났다. CAC 지수 분석결과, 싱가포르는 10대 품목 중 경쟁력있는 2개 품목에서 CAC 지수가 개선되고, CAC 지수 1이하의 품목군에서는 CAC 지수값이 각각 4개 품목씩 미세상승하거나 감소하였다. 따라서 미국의 QE 여파로 싱가포르 10대 수출품목의 대미수출은 상당한 타격을 입은 것으로 분석되었다. 반면 미국의 경우 QE 실시 후 싱가포르 시장에서 CAC 지수가 1보다 크며 지수값이 개선된 품목은 3개에 불과하였다. 미국 QE가 세계시장을 대상으로 하는 싱가포르의 수출경쟁력에 미친 부정적 영향을 TSI, RCA 지수로 파악하기에는 모호한 점이 있었지만, 무역상대국 시장에서의 경쟁력을 가늠하는 CAC 지수분석에서는 미국의 QE가 싱가포르의 대미수출에 상당한 타격을 입힌 것으로 분석되었다. This study analyzes how large the American QE1-QE4 have impacted on the US-Singapore trade, especially how Singapore‘s export competitiveness has changed since the quantitative easing in United States market. For analysis, time series statistics for eight years, from 2005 to 2012, which includes the period before and after American quantitative easing, about exchange rates and US-Singapore bilateral trade were used and index analysis methods such as Trade Specification Index (TSI), Revealed Comparative Advantage Index (RCA), Comparative Advantage Index by Country (CAC) were applied. As a result of analysis, the TSI of half of the Singapore‘s top ten export items has deteriorated and the other half has improved. Therefore, we could not confirm clearly whether United States quantitative easing affected negatively on the international specialization index of Singapore’s top 10 exports. On the contrary, the TSI of the United States has improved after the implementation of QE overall in eight items. In the Singapore‘s RCA analysis, it appeared that only RCA indices of three items moved lower as well after quantitative easing, while the indices of seven items improved. On the other hand, the RCA indices of the United States have improved only in two items and went from bad to worse in overall exports in spite of the QE. The data showed like this that the US quantitative easing had not so much impact on their own RCA indices. On the other hand, clearly different results were produced in the CAC analysis, unlike the results of TSI and RCA analyses. That is, it was proved that exports of Singapore’s top ten export items to United States were reduced considerably in the wake of American quantitative easing. Unlike in the case of Singapore, the export items of the United States that the CAC index value was larger than 1 and improved steadily was only three after QE in the Singapore market. It was difficult and obscure to analyze negative impact of American quantitative easing on Singapore‘s export competitiveness in the world market through TSI and RCA indices. But in the CAC index analysis, which measures the export competitiveness in the market of trading partner, it was analyzed that the American quantitative easing hit strongly the Singapore's export to United States market.