RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 주택성능등급과 친환경건축물인증의 평가방법 비교를 통한 개선안 연구 : 환경관련등급을 중심으로

        김명신(Myoung-Shin Kim),황재우(Jae-Woo Hwang),천정길(Jung-Gil Chun),하대웅(Dae-Woong Ha),박경순(Kyung-Soon Park),손원득(Won-Tug Son) 대한설비공학회 2009 대한설비공학회 학술발표대회논문집 Vol.2009 No.-

        A variety of Certification systems are initiated, as increased demands for housing quality of building & house owner. New building and apartment built in Seoul metropolitan should acquire Building Energy Rating System and Housing Performance Grade indication System, Green Building Certification System. Building Energy Rating System could be acquired through the certification from energy performance index of environment grade in Housing Performance Grade Indication. Between Housing Performance Grade Indication and Green Building Certification System, There are troublesome to acquire certification because a lot of assessment items are overlapped. At a result, the rational and efficient certification system should be initiated not only to avoid overlap among those certification systems and promote Green Building market share but also efficient certification system operation. We will discuss on assessment items between Housing Performance Grade Indication System and Green Building Certification System and release the improvement method those Certification Systems to avoid overlapping to assessment items.

      • 일본 기존주택의 장기우량주택인정제도와 장기우량화 리폼 추진사업의 내용 및 시사점

        김수암(Kim, Soo-Am),백정훈(Baek, Cheong-Hoon),양현정(Yang, Hyeon-Jeong) 한국주거학회 2019 한국주거학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.31 No.1

        In Japan, based on the housing performance indication system, the long-term quality housing certification system has been implemented since 2009. Since 2013, the long-life quality housing certification system has been introduced to existing housings, and a long-life quality housing reform project has been newly established and operated under the support system. South Korea also operates a long-life housing certification system that corresponds to Japan"s long-life quality housing, but it is a fact that no direction has been established for extending the life of existing housing. From this background, this study aims to examine the contents of the long-life quality housing certification system and the subsidy system of existing houses in Japan and to find suggestions. This can be used as a reference to study the direction of the foundation for extending the life of existing homes in Korea.

      • KCI등재

        장수명 주택 인증제도 개선을 위한 전문가 의견조사 연구

        김은영,황은경,정윤혜 한국생태환경건축학회 2017 한국생태환경건축학회 논문집 Vol.17 No.6

        Purpose: Due to the development of construction technologies of apartment housing, such as parking structures, noise between floors, air conditioning and heating facilities, and durability since the 2000s, it is possible to secure more than 40 years for the physical life of building. In spite of such advancements and increased physical life, apartment housing often fails to meet the requirements of the social life criteria. As a result, housing structures are often removed in earlier stages. Therefore, the long-life housing construction and certification standards were newly established in December 24, 2014. Nevertheless, all 392 housing cases have received a normal grade as of September 2017 except one case. The purpose of this study is to review the present status and problems of the long-life housing certification system and establish the improvement direction of the certification system. Method: For the method of study, the improvement direction of certification system were drawn through FGI, certification data analysis, and relevant expert opinion surveys. Results: The results of this study are as follow. First, it is necessary to readjust the certification period which was defined prior to the project approval plan. Second, the primary reason for a low certification rate was the financial burden accrued from increased construction expense. Moreover, the opinion to expand incentives for revitalizing the long-life housing market and distribution accounted for the highest ratio. Third, it is necessary to readjust items and point distribution by considering the field applicability and technical levels for each certification area. The result of this study is significant as it serves as preliminary data for long-term and short-term improvements of the certification system.

      • KCI등재

        주택임차인의 임차보증금 보호를 위한 법정책적 고찰

        김판기 ( Pan Gi Kim ) 한국법정책학회 2013 법과 정책연구 Vol.13 No.1

        주택임대차보호법은 임차인의 보호라는 기본 목적을 달성하고 임차인 보호에 충실을 기하기 위하여 여러 제도들을 보완하는 작업이 이루어졌고(확정일자를 받은 임차인의 경우 우선변제권을 인정, 임대차의 존속을 2년간 보장, 임차권등기명령제도의 도입, 주택임대차위원회의 신설 등), 이러한 보완 작업은 여전히 현재진행형에 있다. 주택임차인의 보호와 관련하여 이른바 채권적 전세의 비중이 높은 우리나라의 경우에 임차인 보호의 핵심은 임대차 존속기간 보장을 통한 주거의 안정과 임대차 종료 후 임차보증금의 안전한 회수에 있다고 해도 과언이 아닐 것이다. 이는 그 간의 주택임대차보호법의 개정을 보더라도 자명한 것이라 할 수 있다. 하지만 이러한 법 개정을 통한 노력에도 불구하고 여전히 보호를 받지 못하는 사각지대가 남아있어 한 해에도 많은 사들이 임대차 보증금을 받지 못하고 임차주택에서 쫓겨나는 일이 발생하고 있으며, 임대차 보증금과 관련된 수많은 소송들이 제기되고 있다. 국민의 주거생활 안정을 보장하기 위해 1981년 주택임대차보호법이 제정된 이래 다양한 형태로 주택임차인의 보호수단이 마련되어 운용이 되고 있다. 하지만 이러한 주택임대차보호법의 제정 자체는 법논리적 접근 보다는 임차인 보호라는 법정책적 접근이라고 판단된다. 이에 따라 임대차보증금 보호제도의 개선도 외국의 입법례나 법논리적 접근 보다는 임차인 보호라는 법정책적 관점에서 임대인과 임차인의 이익이 공평하게 보장될 수 있는 새로운 제도를 도입하는 것이 최선의 방법일 것으로 생각된다. 이에 본 논문에서는 2012년 현재 우리나라의 주택임대차 현황을 분석함으로써 여전히 주택임차인의 보호가 문제되고 있는 점을 인식하고, 외국의 입법례 및 기존 제도의 반성을 통해 주택임차인의 보호라는 주택임대차보호법의 기본목적을 달성하기 위한, 특히 주택임대차 보증금 보호를 위한 여러 대안을 제시하였다. The purpose of Housing Lease Protection Act is to secure stability in the residential life of national citizens, by providing for special cases to the Civil Act with respect to the lease of building for residence. Housing Lease Protection Act was amended several times for making up for the weak points in Housing Lease Protection Act. As a result, new systems were introduced in Housing Lease Protection Act as follows: introduction of right to preferential payment, the securing of period of existence, introduction of order of lease registration, introduction of housing lease committee and so on. However, making up for the weak points in Housing Lease Protection Act is continued as ever. The heart of protection for lessee is the stabilization of residence by the securing of period of existence and safe recovery of deposit after completion of lease. However, blind spot where lessee is not under the protection of the law is existing as ever in spite of efforts. So lessee being thrown out of the house come into being and is facing a lawsuit about deposit. Our country introduced the protecting systems after the 1981 Housing Lease Protection Act. However, these protecting systems was approached in terms of legal policy rather than terms of legal logic. So new systems for protection of lessee should be considered in terms of legal policy rather then comparative study of foreign laws. New systems for protection of lessee should be in any way fair to the law-abiding citizens(lessor and lessee). In this study, I would review and analyze the present condition of our housing lease and some problems of our systems for protection of lessee. And then, I would offer solutions to these problems. In the first chapter, there would be presented the purpose, scope and method of this study. In the second chapter, I would grasp the present status of our housing lease through various statistical data. And also, I would deduce character in the housing lease system, expressly the lease system of a house on a deposit basis. In the third chapter, I would grasp the present status of our various systems for protection of lessee. In the fourth chapter, I would address and analyze foreign systems(Germany) for introduction of new systems. On the basis of review and analysis, I would make implications for our systems about systems for protection of lessee. In the fifth chapter, I would offer new systems for protection of lessee as follows: introduction of system puting a ceiling on deposit, introduction of depositing system on deposit, introduction of certification system of payment on deposit, improvement of announcement system and so on.

      • KCI등재

        장수명주택 품질 수준 향상을 위한 인증제도 개선 연구

        우수진(Woo, Sujin),황은경(Hwang, Eun-Kyoung),김은영(Kim, Eun-Young),김수암(Kim, Sooam) 대한건축학회 2016 대한건축학회논문집 Vol.32 No.8

        Due to insufficient reflection of reality on the system and effectiveness of incentives, all certifications granted to the present since the implementation of the system are accepted as the normal class. The normal class has an advantage that the burden of constructors for additional expenses is low so that it can be implemented without burden but in fact there is a limit to consider the normal level as long-life housing and if only essential items are selected and accepted as the normal level, long-life housing may become less meaningful. Therefore, it is necessary to re-establish the evaluation items and standards of long-life housing certification system in order to improve the quality level of long-life housing. In this study, (1) the evaluation standards for long-life housing certification system were re-established and the relevant literature and precedent studies were considered, and (2) problems were examined through the current status analysis of certification acquisition. (3) An expert consultation meeting targeting the relevant experts from construction companies, design companies and long-life certification authorities was held to re-establish the evaluation items and standards for the certification system. The improvement plans for each item including durability, variability and easy maintenance drawn accordingly were presented and the measures to improve the level of long-life housing which was in the normal level were searched. The purpose of long-life housing is to save limited resources and energy, improve the value of individual assets and save the housing management expenses for the people by securing the existing housing of good quality at a national level. Therefore, a phased approach to improve problems shown in the present stage and to prepare efficient systems should be implemented in order to revitalize long-life housing agreed and required by the people.

      • 한국과 미국 녹색건축 인증제도의 비교분석을 통한 호환성 연구

        김정곤(Kim, Jung-Gon),방문선(Bang, Moon-Sun) 한국실내디자인학회 2014 한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2014 No.11

        Due to globally sustainable development emerging concept for buildings and rapid depletion of energy sources, the need for green building is increasing and green building certification system from various countries has been implemented. Internal certification system(G-SEED) has been studying continuously with a revision of certification system every year. Despite this, various internal applicants regard foreign countries’ certification systems as ideal ones. Among foreign certification systems, people tend to pursuit LEED of American system. Even if they get G-SEED certification, they try to get additional LEED certification. Certifications are all different in each country’s pursuing goals and systems because their weather and geological factors are different. However, in the case you want to receive a LEED certificate domestically, above all, it is determined that there is a reason for advertising. So, in this study, there will be a qualification standard of evaluation items and comparison analysis of that in newly revised G-SEED and LEED. Through these analyses, some of difference will be found between two certification systems. Getting out of obtaining LEED"s certification recklessly, this research implies to contribute an insured green building certification system only through G-SEED certification. Furthermore, this purpose of this study is to promote application action plans and improvement plans about Korean green building certification system.

      • KCI등재

        장수명 주택 관계자별 인센티브 부여 방향 설정에 관한 연구

        김은영(Kim, Eun-Young),장순각(Jang, Soon-Gak),황은경(Hwang, Eun-Kyoung) 한국실내디자인학회 2016 한국실내디자인학회논문집 Vol.25 No.1

        Long-life housing means a housing which structural members (Support) such as columns and floor are maintained for a long period of time and the housing can be used for approximately 100 years by replacing components (Infill) such as walls and furniture. The government established「Certification standards of long-life housing construction」on December 24, 2014, requiring the long-life housing certification for construction of apartment houses for over 1,000 households. However, it is necessary to prepare an incentive measure which could be granted to construction related personnel and housing owners due to the effectiveness of such system and recognition that the initial construction cost of long-life housing is high. The purpose of this study is as follows. First, the reasons and necessity of long-life housing cost increase for each construction company, housing owner, infill component manufacturer and designer which are long-life housing related personnel are determined. The direction of incentive grant for supplying long-life housing based on the determined items is established. The result of this study is as follows. First, a special treatment which is higher than the alleviation of construction standards according to the previous ordinance is necessary for construction companies to secure the business feasibility. Also, incentives such as the provision of service space and wide balcony are necessary to improve the preference level of parceling out. Second, financial incentives such as financial support for housing purchase, reduction and exemption of tax (acquisition tax and registration tax), and support of maintenance cost are required for house owners. Third, it is essential to increase opportunities to participate in the market for infill component manufacturers by applying additional points for PQ. Fourth, it is needed to provide compensation for additional human resource and time at the time of designing to designers by preparing the long-life housing design cost standards.

      • 장수명주택 인증제도 등급별 보급모델 제안

        강지연(Kang, Ji-Yeon),김형근(Kim, Hyung-Geun),김아현(Kim, A-Hyum) 한국주거학회 2016 한국주거학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2016 No.4

        The long-life housing certification system must have been applied more than 1,000 households apartments since 2015. There have been no prototypes for long-life housing since long life certification system enforced last year. After analyze long-life housing certification cases for apartment houses recently, we rearrange basic requirements for long-life housing. It is necessary for us to suggest the prototypes for the rating in the Korean Long-life housing certification. Therefore, the unit 59㎡ prototypes of long life housing are suggested and applied in the testbed., which is going to be built in 2016.

      • KCI등재

        국내 공동주택 관련 인증제도의 세부 항목에 대한 비교 분석에 관한 연구

        정지나(Jung Ji-Na),태춘섭(Tae Choon-Seob),양정훈(Yang Jeong-Hoon),박상동(Park Sang-Dong) 한국태양에너지학회 2010 한국태양에너지학회 논문집 Vol.30 No.3

        A various building certification systems are being enforced in Korea. However, the enforcement of many building certification systems has brought on the concerned people's confusion and the operation of various building certification systems which have similar assesment items causes much time and economical losses. Therefore, in this paper, the features of the GBCS(Green Building Certification System), Housing Performance Indication System, Building Energy Rating System, and Green Home Standard and Performance Evaluation System are compared and the correlations among each building certification system are analysed. As a result, it is presented that a considerable number of assessment items were so similar and identical that integration of building certification systems is needed for effective operation of these systems.

      • KCI등재

        노인주거 대안으로서의 친환경 공동주택 디자인 가이드라인 제시

        이진우(Lee, Jin Woo),남경숙(Nam, Kyung-Sook) 한국실내디자인학회 2015 한국실내디자인학회논문집 Vol.24 No.4

        This study aims to suggest `an eco-friendly residential housing design guideline as an elderly housing alternative` by mixing the concept of a `sensor citizen community` housing environment with the concept of an `eco-friendly` housing environment, based on the directivity of an elderly housing alternative for surviving in a super-aged society and the directivity of a sustainable housing environment of providing against global warming. Basically, this study considered the directivity of `an eco-friendly residential building as an elderly housing alternative` by analyzing housing environment elements and elements to be considered in an elderly housing environment and setting the directivity of an elderly housing environment, which reflects the change in the design paradigm. In relation to the concept of universal design, for considering the perspective of elderly users, existing elements were compared and major planning elements were applied to the scope of complex planning, communal space and housing unit space. In relation to the concept of eco-friendly design, also, a guideline was re-organized and planning elements were applied to each category by comparing domestic and foreign green building certification system. Based on domestic and foreign authorized guidelines of universal design and green building certification system, this study was focused on suggesting an eco-friendly residential housing design guideline as an elderly housing alternative to make users perceive the need for a specific indoor environment design guideline and system.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼