http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
『한눈팔기(道草)』에 나타난 소세키의 자본주의 인식의 한 측면에 관한 연구
조영석(曺榮錫) 중앙대학교 일본연구소 2013 日本 硏究 Vol.0 No.35
This study examined a money matter on Soseki"s literary works by focusing on his capitalistic perception. Without exception, there were money matters entwined between the characters" relationships. Also, he raised a question about the dominance on money and negotiability which is one of the importance aspects in a capitalistic society. Especially I will study an aspect of his perception about capitalism by examining『Mich Kusa』 which dealt a money matter in Soseki"s personal life. In『Mich Kusa』, Soseki was continuously drawing a drama which his money matter was entwined with Kenjo"s past and his relationships. As around 10 years passed, it is confirmed that Soseki"s reflective feelings were turned into negative perspectives about money through Kenjo, the main character. What Soseki wrote in『Mich Kusa』 didn"t investigate the structure which the privileged class exploited other classes. He also didn"t write about human"s behavior that a person does something evil because of lack of money. Soseki wrote about the reality how humans degrade themselves as they arouse desires for money. Soseki assumed that a person who degrades his dignity by being tempted by money (especially Simada) cannot be refined through education or courtesy since that is the person"s nature. Soseki is thought that he wrote『Mich Kusa』 to reflect his past. While he was writing, he realized he could not mention about his past not mentioning about relationships entwined with money. In addition, he depicted the reality that the dominance on money can affect a person"s live. It was his intention to reveal the reality of human"s life. In his work said Kenjo "Everyone wants money and no one wants anything else except money.” Soseki expressed his strong discontent in Kenjo"s statement that a human who wants money more than spirit but stolen without anything spiritually. This is nothing but he perceived the dominance on money and negotiability which is one of the characteristics of capitalism.
조영일(曺泳日) 서강대학교 인문과학연구소 2016 서강인문논총 Vol.0 No.47
본고는 김윤식이 행한 학병연구의 연장선상에서 이루어진 논문으로 그동안 거의 주목을 받지 못한 학병 윤재현이 남긴 저서들을 분석함으로써 학병세대의 정신구조를 도출하려는 시도 중 하나이다. 이를 위해 본고에서는 해방공간에서 쓰인 저작 두 권을 먼저 다루었다. 먼저 정치팸플릿이라 할 수 있는 『우리 임시정부』(1946)에서 엄항섭이 행한 합병비판의 의미를 확인하면서 당시 학병들에게 존재한 수치심과 자긍심이라는 상반된 감정을 문제삼은 후, 그런 학병이 임시정부를 옹호하는 논리를 점검하고 상호의존적 관계로서 학병과 임시정부의 관계를 살펴보았다. 그 다음 최초의 장편 학병수기인 『사선을 헤매이며』(1949)를 통해 학병세대의 반군사주의적 태도와 학병지원이라는 결단을 가능하게 한 교양주의의 관계, 일본병정으로서 겪게 된 정체성의 혼란을 문제삼았다. 그리고 학병체험을 기록할 때 발생하는 희극성과 비극성의 원인을 짚어본 후 마지막 부분에 등장하는 한 줄 공백과 학병과 독립운동가라는 이중적 정체성이 가진 의미를 되새겨 보았다.