RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI우수등재

        IMF 경제위기가 비영리조직의 재원조달에 미친 영향 - 문화예술단체를 중심으로

        권기헌(Gi Heon Kwon),정광호(Kwang Ho Jung) 한국행정학회 2002 韓國行政學報 Vol.36 No.2

        본 논문은 IMF 경제위기로 인한 비영리문화예술단체들의 수익감소가 그들의 조직특성별로 어떻게 다르게 나타나는지를 회귀분석모형, 선형확률모형, 로짓모형, 프로빗모형 등 여러 통계모형을 토대로 분석하였다. 본 연구의 주요 분석결과로는, 첫째, 조직의 규모가 클수록 경제위기의 영향을 상대적으로 더 강하게 받는다는 것을 알 수 있었으며, 둘째, 조직의 전문화 정도가 높을수록 경제위기와 상관없이 조직자체의 지속적인 수입을 확보하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 자체 수익사업을 성공적으로 해온 문화단체들의 경우 경제위기에도 불구하고 수익규모를 꾸준히 확장시켜나가고 있음을 볼 수 있었으며, 지방문화원과 같은 문화관광부의 직접적인 영향권에 있는 문화예술단체들의 경우 다른 민간주도의 문화예술단체들보다 경제위기에 따른 영향을 덜 받은 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로, 본 논문은 이러한 분석결과에 따른 이론적, 정책적 시사점을 논의하면서 연구의 한계 및 추후 연구에 대한 방향을 제시하고 있다. This study examines the relationship between organizations` characteristics and their revenue sources. This study focuses on non-governmental organizations (NGOs), particularly the nonprofit culture and art organizations. More specifically, this study explores variations in the financial funding of those NGOs in the wake of the financial crisis that struck Korea in 1997-98. The main research questions are as follows: How did the exogenous economic crisis affect the revenue of NGOs? Are the variations of those revenue changes related to the functional characteristics of the specific organizational type? What are the theoretical and practical implications from the findings of these research questions? In the first part, we develop the major hypotheses derived from the work of organizational ecologists and institutional theorists and propose empirical models that are used in the research. These hypotheses address how the effects of the economic crisis are conditional upon organizations` age, size, professionalizaton, commercial activities, and founding types. In the second part, we describe the sources of the data and discuss some important features of the data. In the next section, using analytical models based on OLS and discrete dependent variable models such as linear probability model, logit model and probit model, we discuss the empirical results from the analysis. We find that organizational size, commercial activities and founding types have significant effects on the financial retrenchment from the economic crisis. In the final section, we summarize the major findings and discuss the policy implications of those findings.

      • KCI등재

        정책학의 새로운 이념으로서의 성찰성에 대한 고찰 : 정책이념과 정책모형으로서의 성찰성, 그 가능성과 한계

        권기헌(Gi-Heon, Kwon) 한국국정관리학회 2021 현대사회와 행정 Vol.31 No.2

        본 논문에서는 정책학의 새로운 이념으로서 등장하고 있는 성찰성에 대해서 고찰하였다. 행정 이념으로서의 성찰성, 정책모형으로서의 성찰성, 그 적용가능성과 한계 등에 대해서 검토하였 다. 현대행정은 사악하고 혹은 거대하고 복합적인 문제들이 다양하게 등장하고 있다. 기존 정부 모형에서 보여주었던 문제해결방식인 효율성, 시장성, 관계 네트워크 등으로는 풀기 어려운 비선형적 문제들이 등장하고 있다. 새로운 정부모형은 속도와 규범 측면에서, 더 신속한 문제해결 하고 높은 윤리의식을 기반으로 책임지고 소통하는 리더십을 강력하게 요청하고 있다. 이런 관점에서도 본 연구에서 검토한 성찰성은 새로운 정책이념 및 정책모형으로 조명될 필요성이 높을 것으로 사료된다. In this study, we explored a new concpet of reflexivity as a new administrative ideology and a new policy governance model. We discussed the agile government, communication and leadership of responsibility to match the fourth industrial revolution. We then looked at the fourth generation of government models that require a new form of governing thought and ideology called ‘reflexivity.’ And then we looked for new directions and goals for the development of the fourth generation of government model and ideology. The fourth industrial revolution, or any other modern situation surrounding the government, is rapidly changing at such a rapid pace that it can be called a Turbulence. If the public administration is not to face the criticism that its administration is failing to solve the country’s social problems, it should be a quick response to social changes. The ‘new’ public administration, or the ‘new’ administration model, may require a keen discussion about the model in the future if it is not to end up as a discourse or a fabrication. Components requirements such as conceptual premise, ideology and philosophy, model and leadership will require intense discussion. Furthermore, the academic community must explore the keen and various theoretical preconditions of ‘reflexivity’ suggested in this study, from its cognitive foundation to the future policy design and leadership.

      • KCI등재후보

        과학기술 경쟁력 제고를 위한 대형연구시설 및 장비 평가모형 분석

        권기헌(Gi Heon Kwon),차용진(Yong Jin Cha),이홍재(Hong Jae Lee) 한국기술혁신학회 2007 기술혁신학회지 Vol.10 No.1

        본 연구의 목적은 과학기술경쟁력 향상을 위한 대형연구시설 및 장비구축 평가모형을 도출하고 이 평가모형의 신뢰성 및 타당성을 검토하고자 한다. 분석결과, 대형연구시설 및 장비구축 평가모형에 대한 신뢰성 및 타당성이 높게 나타났다. 과학기술과 국가정책차원의 신뢰성 분석결과에서 2개의 구성요인의 신뢰성은 높게 나타나고 있어, 과학기술차원의 5개 측정지표들, 국가정책차원의 6개 측정지표들의 내적일관성이 매우 높음을 보여주고 있다. 또한 타당성 분석결과에서 과학기술, 국가정책차원은 내용타당성, 구성타당성 그리고 기준타당성이 높게 나타나고 있다. 또한 고차요인 분석결과에서 대형연구시설 및 장비구축 평가모형 적합도가 대체로 적합하게 나타나고 있어 평가모형과 자료가 잘 부합되고 있음을 보여주고 있다. 이러한 분석결과를 토대로 본 연구에서는 정책적 함의를 제시하고 있다. The purpose of this study is to construct the evaluation model for the major science research facilities and equipments to enhance the competitiveness of the science and technology and also to test the reliability and validity of the model. To achieve the purposes, this study theoretically reviews the concept of the major science research facilities and equipments and their characteristics. Through a review of literature, this study draws 11 criteria for evaluating the priorities of the major science research facilities and equipments. These criteria are categorized as two dimensions - 'science & technology' and 'national policy'. The dimension of science & technology includes scientific importance, technological readiness, utilization rate, common utilization rate, and ability of management and operation. The national policy dimension contains degree of correspondence with national science development, imperativeness of national policy, science and technical effectiveness, economic and industrial effectiveness, responsiveness of research demand, and equity among the related institutions. The competitiveness of the science and technology consists of these two dimensions. The evaluation model is established on the framework of criteria. The 18 major science research facilities and equipments are selected through a series of Delphi. The survey of experts (BT, ET, IT, NT and ST) is also implemented to evaluate the 18 major science research facilities and equipments by 11 criteria. The overall results indicate that the reliability and validity of the model are good. The reliability tests show that the five indicators of science & technology and the six indicators of national policy have high internal consistencies. The confirmatory factor analyses reveal that the two constructs - 'science & technology' and 'national policy' - have high convergent and discriminant validity. The correlational analyses also show that the criteria-related validity between them is high. Furthermore, the results of higher order factor analysis indicate that the fit indices of the model are high and suggest a good fit to the data. Based on these findings, the policy implications of the model are discussed.

      • KCI등재

        건강보험보장성 강화정책과 민간보험지출액의 관계분석

        권기헌(Kwon, Gi-Heon),이동규(Lee, DongKyu),서인석(Seo, Inseok) 경기연구원 2014 GRI 연구논총 Vol.16 No.2

        It is believed that the current policy trend for strengthening the national healthcare insurance coverage is thought to be an appropriate move. In particular, any one of the five key diseases can threaten the very economic foundation of a family. Therefore, it is necessary to consider providing even a broader range of support for the diseases that can become serious economic burdens to families. However, in order to ensure continuous strengthening of the policies on insurance coverage, it is necessary to verify the efficacy of these policies. It would be very difficult to provide continuous supports to policies whose effects are yet to be verified. In spite of such importance, existing studies related to the healthcare insurance system, which is necessary to secure the right of acquiring and maintaining a healthy life for everyone, have been conducted by the public healthcare sector and the private health insurance sector separately, resulting in the absence of a study that focuses on the relationship between the two with empirical discussions on their effects. Existing studies focus mainly on the level of health and satisfaction to examine the effects of strengthening healthcare insurance coverage. As for the studies on the expenditure by private insurers, many of these were conducted without decent control groups, rendering the results not sophisticated enough to highlight the true efficacy of such policies. In this study, we used a DID (differences in differences) model to identify a control group and measure the efficacy of the policies on the target audiences, with a view to quantifying the effect of the policy to strengthen healthcare insurance coverage on the expenditures made by private insurers.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼