RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소비자의 식품안전 체감 및 역량척도 개발 연구 = Development of Consumers` Perceived Food Safety and Food Safety Competency Measurement

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100768675

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Today`s consumers confront various risks in everyday life and safety issues related to food becomes one of the major issues for consumers as food-borne illnesses and diseases increases. Since 2000, Korean consumers have had great interests in well-being and among the various aspects of well-being, physical and psychological well-being have been in the major focus of consumer lifestyle. As such consumers` interests with food safety have been dramatically increased and leaded dramatic growth in organic food industry. Recently, many food-related scandals and accidents have occurred and these scandals heighten consumers` needs for better food safety. To gauge a society`s overall level of food safety, a comprehensive approach should be adopted. So far in the literature food safety has been studied with limited scope and coverage. Consumers` food safety orientation includes two distinct components: perceived food safety and food safety competency. Consumers` perceived food safety is a key component to gauge consumers` food safety orientation because it relates to consumers` basic attitudes about food issue. However, without proper knowledge and practice consumers` could not enjoy desirable level of food safety therefore, consumers` competency is also very important. Consumers` perceived food safety refers to the level of consumers perception about food safety and it includes consumers` awareness and evaluation about food issues. Previous research on perceived food safety have examined about five subject areas of food safety issues: consumers general perception about food safety, food safety issues with production and retailing, food safety policy and administration, food safety information and education, food labeling issues, and food safety concerns. Consumers` food safety competency refers to the knowledge, attitudes, and practice to manage food related task to achieve desired levels of food safety. Consumers` food safety competency sub-constructs (i.e., knowledge, attitudes, and practice) have been studies with various consumer groups on several food categories. The purpose of this research was to develop consumers` perceived food safety measurement and food safety competency measurement to properly gauge consumers` food safety orientation of a society. The measurement will be used to further develop an index of consumer food safety orientation. To develop consumers` perceived food safety measurement and food safety competency measurement, this research utilized expert reviews, delphi study, and test-retest analyses. First, a list of sample measurement items were gathered based on a comprehensive literature review. Specifically total of 54 questions in eight sub-constructs of perceived food safety were selected from literature to get experts review. The eight sub-constructs include overall food safety perception, food production safety, food safety policy and administration, food safety information, food safety threats, food safety concerns, trustworthiness of food labeling, and food safety education. For candidates of food safety competency measurement, total of 49 questions on food safety knowledge, food safety significance, safe cooking procedure, hand washing methods in handling food, interests in food safety, food safety threats, food purchasing behavior, food safety education, and concerns about food safety were selected. These questions were sent to three experts in the area to initial reviews and evaluation. Based on the experts` review each measurement sub-constructs were reorganized. Three subconstructs( food safety policy and administration, food safety information and food safety education) from the perceived food safety have been deleted and several individual questions have been modified before the Delphi study. From the initial list of food safety competency, a new and different sub-constructs of knowledge, attitudes, and practice were formed and forwarded to the Delphi study. The Delphi study was conducted with 19 experts in the fields and the two measurements were reviewed, modified, and reorganized. Total of 35 questions in 5 sub-constructs for perceived food safety and 35 questions in 3 sub-constructs for food safety components were included in a consumer questionnaire for test, re-test reliability test. Consumer data was gathered through online survey from 300 participants with 1 week time span between test and re-test. The survey data was analyzed using correlation test, reliability test, exploratory factor analyses, and confirmatory factor analyses. Further modifications of the measurement were applied to the measurement based on the reliability and correlation tests. The factor analyses results showed desirable levels of reliability and validity of the measurement. The final measurement of perceived food safety includes 35 questions on five sub- constructs of overall food safety perception, safety in food production and retailing, food safety threats, concerns with food safety, and trustworthiness of food labeling. The final measurement of food safety competency includes 35 questions on consumer knowledge, attitudes, and practices on food safety. The food safety practice includes examination on food condition, examination on food labeling, general food safety behavior, and food purchase behavior. The measurements that were developed from this research showed proper levels of validity and reliability. Therefore, these measurements can be used to gauge a society`s level of consumer food safety orientation. Further development on food safety orientation index will be useful to push forward to better level of food safety and increased levels of consumer well-being.
    번역하기

    Today`s consumers confront various risks in everyday life and safety issues related to food becomes one of the major issues for consumers as food-borne illnesses and diseases increases. Since 2000, Korean consumers have had great interests in well-bei...

    Today`s consumers confront various risks in everyday life and safety issues related to food becomes one of the major issues for consumers as food-borne illnesses and diseases increases. Since 2000, Korean consumers have had great interests in well-being and among the various aspects of well-being, physical and psychological well-being have been in the major focus of consumer lifestyle. As such consumers` interests with food safety have been dramatically increased and leaded dramatic growth in organic food industry. Recently, many food-related scandals and accidents have occurred and these scandals heighten consumers` needs for better food safety. To gauge a society`s overall level of food safety, a comprehensive approach should be adopted. So far in the literature food safety has been studied with limited scope and coverage. Consumers` food safety orientation includes two distinct components: perceived food safety and food safety competency. Consumers` perceived food safety is a key component to gauge consumers` food safety orientation because it relates to consumers` basic attitudes about food issue. However, without proper knowledge and practice consumers` could not enjoy desirable level of food safety therefore, consumers` competency is also very important. Consumers` perceived food safety refers to the level of consumers perception about food safety and it includes consumers` awareness and evaluation about food issues. Previous research on perceived food safety have examined about five subject areas of food safety issues: consumers general perception about food safety, food safety issues with production and retailing, food safety policy and administration, food safety information and education, food labeling issues, and food safety concerns. Consumers` food safety competency refers to the knowledge, attitudes, and practice to manage food related task to achieve desired levels of food safety. Consumers` food safety competency sub-constructs (i.e., knowledge, attitudes, and practice) have been studies with various consumer groups on several food categories. The purpose of this research was to develop consumers` perceived food safety measurement and food safety competency measurement to properly gauge consumers` food safety orientation of a society. The measurement will be used to further develop an index of consumer food safety orientation. To develop consumers` perceived food safety measurement and food safety competency measurement, this research utilized expert reviews, delphi study, and test-retest analyses. First, a list of sample measurement items were gathered based on a comprehensive literature review. Specifically total of 54 questions in eight sub-constructs of perceived food safety were selected from literature to get experts review. The eight sub-constructs include overall food safety perception, food production safety, food safety policy and administration, food safety information, food safety threats, food safety concerns, trustworthiness of food labeling, and food safety education. For candidates of food safety competency measurement, total of 49 questions on food safety knowledge, food safety significance, safe cooking procedure, hand washing methods in handling food, interests in food safety, food safety threats, food purchasing behavior, food safety education, and concerns about food safety were selected. These questions were sent to three experts in the area to initial reviews and evaluation. Based on the experts` review each measurement sub-constructs were reorganized. Three subconstructs( food safety policy and administration, food safety information and food safety education) from the perceived food safety have been deleted and several individual questions have been modified before the Delphi study. From the initial list of food safety competency, a new and different sub-constructs of knowledge, attitudes, and practice were formed and forwarded to the Delphi study. The Delphi study was conducted with 19 experts in the fields and the two measurements were reviewed, modified, and reorganized. Total of 35 questions in 5 sub-constructs for perceived food safety and 35 questions in 3 sub-constructs for food safety components were included in a consumer questionnaire for test, re-test reliability test. Consumer data was gathered through online survey from 300 participants with 1 week time span between test and re-test. The survey data was analyzed using correlation test, reliability test, exploratory factor analyses, and confirmatory factor analyses. Further modifications of the measurement were applied to the measurement based on the reliability and correlation tests. The factor analyses results showed desirable levels of reliability and validity of the measurement. The final measurement of perceived food safety includes 35 questions on five sub- constructs of overall food safety perception, safety in food production and retailing, food safety threats, concerns with food safety, and trustworthiness of food labeling. The final measurement of food safety competency includes 35 questions on consumer knowledge, attitudes, and practices on food safety. The food safety practice includes examination on food condition, examination on food labeling, general food safety behavior, and food purchase behavior. The measurements that were developed from this research showed proper levels of validity and reliability. Therefore, these measurements can be used to gauge a society`s level of consumer food safety orientation. Further development on food safety orientation index will be useful to push forward to better level of food safety and increased levels of consumer well-being.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정정화, "함평지역 고등학생의 식품위생 및 안전의식 조사" 조선대학교 교육대학원 2008

    2 유현정, "한국의 식품안전관리의 발전을 위한 비교 연구" 위기관리 이론과 실천 6 (6): 123-138, 2010

    3 이혜영, "학부모를 위한 식생활 안전 가이드 개발" 서울교육대학교 교육대학원 2011

    4 윤현주, "초등학생의 식품안전에 대한 지식과 행동의관계에대한연구" 경희대교육대학원 2007

    5 김철숙, "초등학생의 식품안전 지식과 행동수준과의 관계" 원광대학교 교육대학원 2010

    6 최정숙, "주부의 식품안전에 대한 인식과 안전성우려의 관련 요인" 한국식품영양과학회 34 (34): 66-74, 2005

    7 최정숙, "주부의 식품안전에 대한 인식과 안전성우려의 관련 요인" 한국식품영양과학회 34 (34): 66-74, 2005

    8 김규동, "주부들의 식품안전 관련 구매행동 및 정보요구도 조사" 한국식품영양과학회 39 (39): 392-398, 2010

    9 식품의약품안전청, "주방용 목재류 기구 사용시, 이런 점 주의하세요"

    10 노전표, "제품과 매장의 유․무형성이 구매자의 위험지각에 미치는 영향" 11 (11): 111-129, 2000

    1 정정화, "함평지역 고등학생의 식품위생 및 안전의식 조사" 조선대학교 교육대학원 2008

    2 유현정, "한국의 식품안전관리의 발전을 위한 비교 연구" 위기관리 이론과 실천 6 (6): 123-138, 2010

    3 이혜영, "학부모를 위한 식생활 안전 가이드 개발" 서울교육대학교 교육대학원 2011

    4 윤현주, "초등학생의 식품안전에 대한 지식과 행동의관계에대한연구" 경희대교육대학원 2007

    5 김철숙, "초등학생의 식품안전 지식과 행동수준과의 관계" 원광대학교 교육대학원 2010

    6 최정숙, "주부의 식품안전에 대한 인식과 안전성우려의 관련 요인" 한국식품영양과학회 34 (34): 66-74, 2005

    7 최정숙, "주부의 식품안전에 대한 인식과 안전성우려의 관련 요인" 한국식품영양과학회 34 (34): 66-74, 2005

    8 김규동, "주부들의 식품안전 관련 구매행동 및 정보요구도 조사" 한국식품영양과학회 39 (39): 392-398, 2010

    9 식품의약품안전청, "주방용 목재류 기구 사용시, 이런 점 주의하세요"

    10 노전표, "제품과 매장의 유․무형성이 구매자의 위험지각에 미치는 영향" 11 (11): 111-129, 2000

    11 최정민, "일부 식품위생안전 사건들이 고등학교 학생들의 식품표시 이용실태에 미치는 변화" 충남대학교 교육대학원 2009

    12 김영순, "일부 수도권 거주 주민의 식품 안전성에 대한 인식 조사" 한국식품영양학회 19 (19): 121-142, 2006

    13 식품의약품안전청, "우리집 식생활아전가이드 10"

    14 김정환, "어린이의 식품안전에 대한 관심도와 행동평가" 한국조리학회 14 (14): 249-261, 2008

    15 식품의약품안전청, "어르신을 위한식생활안전가이드"

    16 노영화, "식품표시 제도에 관한 연구" 한국소비자원 1999

    17 식품의약품안전청, "식품의약품안전청 고시 제 2009-78호"

    18 장순옥, "식품의 영양표시를 위한영양소 기준치 설정" 104-108, 2000

    19 이기헌, "식품위해 인식실태 및 위험커뮤니케이션 방안 연구" 한국소비자원 34 (34): 105-134, 2008

    20 보건복지부 식품정책과, "식품위생법 제2조, 시행 2012. 6. 8, 법률 10787호"

    21 보건복지부 식품정책과, "식품위생법 제2조 제6항, 시행 2012. 6. 8, 법률 10787호"

    22 식품의약품안전청, "식품용 조리기구의 올바른 사용가이드"

    23 노영화, "식품영양표시제도의 개선방안-시장지향적인 접근-" 1999

    24 이강자, "식품영양표시 제도에 대한 소비자 인식 및 이용실태 ― 20대 남녀를 중심으로 ―" 동아시아식생활학회 14 (14): 54-63, 2004

    25 박광희, "식품안전사고에 대한 소비자의 지식과 대응 방안에 관한 연구" 순천대학교 사회문화예술대학원 2009

    26 정기혜, "식품안전관리에관한 국민의 인지도 및 그 체감도에 따른 행동유형에 관한 조사 연구" 한국보건사회연구원 2004

    27 성미경, "식품안전과 건강" 28 (28): 14-16, 2006

    28 이데일리, "식품불안에 유기농 우유 나홀로 고성장"

    29 송유진, "식품구매시 소비자의 지각된 위험이 안전의식과 안전추구행동에 미치는 영향력의 구조모형분석 - 서울과 상해소비자를 중심으로 -" 한국소비자학회 19 (19): 215-244, 2008

    30 진대일, "식품 위해에 관한 예비 교사들의 인식 조사 연구" 서울교육대학교 교육대학원 2009

    31 김영숙, "식품 영양표시에 대한 소비자능력(지식·태도·기능)과 제도적 제고 방안" 한국소비문화학회 9 (9): 45-66, 2006

    32 황인경, "식생활안전가이드개발연구" 식품의약품안전평가원 2010

    33 김성숙, "소비자의 안전의식과 안전추구행동" 36 (36): 1-14, 1998

    34 박지연, "소비자의 식품안전 인지도와 안전행동 평가" 한국식품위생안전성학회 24 (24): 1-11, 2009

    35 이정희, "소비자의 식품선택에 대한 식품 품질 정보표시정책의 효과분석 : 영양정보표시제를 중심으로" 경상대학교 대학원 2010

    36 김효정, "소비자의 식품 위해요인에 대한 인식도 및 식품 안전에 대한 정보탐색 행동" 동아시아식생활학회 19 (19): 116-129, 2009

    37 배순영, "소비자역량의 측정과비교" 한국소비자원 2010

    38 배순영, "소비자안전체감지수의 개발 및 산출에 관한 연구" 한국소비자원 2006

    39 황정선, "소비자안전체감지수개발연구" 한국소비자원 2009

    40 이학식, "소비자 행동, 마케팅전략적 접근" 법문사 2005

    41 김지은, "부산시내 일부 주부들의 식품사고 발생 후 식품의 안전성과 수입농산물의 안전성 인식정도" 고신대학교 교육대학원 2008

    42 이정윤, "대도시 주부들의 식품안전에 대한 인식 및 우려도에 관한 연구" 한국식품저장유통학회 16 (16): 999-1007, 2009

    43 김효진, "대구·경북지역 초등학생의 식품안전에 대한 인식과 지식이 행동에 미치는 영향" 대구대학교 교육대학원 2009

    44 장덕기, "농식품의 안전성중시에 따른 소비자의 식품구매 행태분석" 한국농식품정책학회 33 (33): 563-582, 2006

    45 손혜은, "고등학생의 식품위생 및 안전 의식과 HACCP 인지도 조사" 영남대학교 교육대학원 2006

    46 김동순, "가공식품의 영양표시에 대한 중학생과 학부모의 이용 및 인지도 실태" 대한영양사협회 8 (8): 301-310, 2002

    47 Taylor, J. W., "The Role of Risk in Consumer Behavior" 38 (38): 54-60, 1974

    48 Jacoby. J., "The Component of Perceived Risk, In Proceeding from Third Annul Conference of the Association for Consumer Research" University of Chicago 382-393, 1972

    49 Prasad, K. V., "Socioeconomic Product Risk and Patronage Preference of Retail Shoppers" 39 (39): 42-47, 1975

    50 Kurtz, D. L, "Services Marketing" John Wiley & Sons 1997

    51 Tareq M. Osaili, "Food safety knowledge and practice" 2011

    52 Irja Haapala, "Food Safety Knowledge, Perceptions, and Behaviors among Middle School Students" 36 (36): 71-76, 2004

    53 Abbot, M., "Comparison of food safety cognitions and self-reported food-handling behaviors with observed food safety behaviors of young adults" 63 (63): 572-579, 2009

    54 Brooker, G, "Assessment of an Expanded Measure of Perceived Risk" 11 (11): 439-441, 1884

    55 Zikumund, W. G., "A Multivariate Anlysis of Perceived Risk, Selfconfidence and Information Sources" 1 (1): 406-416, 1973

    56 Peter, J. P, "A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies" 2 (2): 29-37, 1975

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼