http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
( Takehiko Matsushita ),( Shu Watanabe ),( Daisuke Araki ),( Kanto Nagai ),( Yuichi Hoshino ),( Noriyuki Kanzaki ),( Tomoyuki Matsumoto ),( Takahiro Niikura ),( Ryosuke Kuroda ) 대한슬관절학회 2021 대한슬관절학회지 Vol.33 No.-
Introduction: Previous studies have reported that alignment changes depend on the patient’s position in orthopedic surgery. However, it has not yet been well examined how the patient’s position affects the preoperative planning in high-tibial osteotomy (HTO). Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the patient’s position on preoperative planning in HTO. Materials and methods: A total of 60 knees in 55 patients who underwent HTO were retrospectively examined. Virtual preoperative planning for medial open-wedge HTO (OWHTO), lateral closed-wedge HTO (CWHTO), and hybrid CWHTO were performed by setting the percentage of the weight-bearing line (%WBL) at 62% as an optimal alignment. The correction angle differences between the supine and standing radiographs were measured. The virtual %WBL (v%WBL) was determined by applying the correction angle obtained from the standing radiograph to the supine radiograph. The %WBL discrepancy (%WBLd) was calculated as v%WBL - 62 (%) to predict the possible correction errors during surgeries. A single regression analysis was performed to examine the correlation between the correction angle difference and %WBLd. Results: The mean correction angle was significantly higher when the preoperative planning was based on standing radiographs than when based on supine radiographs (P < 0.001), and the mean difference was 2.2 ± 1.5°. The difference between the two conditions in the medial opening gaps for OWHTO, lateral wedge sizes (mm) for CWHTO, and hybrid CWHTO were 2.6 ± 2.0, 2.3 ± 1.6, and 1.9 ± 1.4, respectively. The mean v%WBL was 71.2% ± 7.3%, and the mean %WBLd was 10.1% ± 7.4%. A single regression analysis revealed a linear correlation between the correction angle difference and %WBLd (%WBLd = 4.72 × correction angle difference + 0.08). No statistically significant difference in the parameters was found between the supine and standing radiographs postoperatively. Conclusions: We found significant differences in the estimated correction angles between the supine and standing radiographs in the planning for HTO. Therefore, surgeons should carefully consider the difference between supine and standing radiographs and estimate the possible correction error during surgery when planning a HTO.
Takafumi Hiranaka,Toshikazu Tanaka,Kenjiro Okimura,Takaaki Fujishiro,Rika Shigemoto,Shotaro Araki,Ryo Okada,Ryohei Nako,Tomoyuki Kamenaga,Koji Okamoto 대한정형외과학회 2021 Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Vol.13 No.1
In Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, the relationship between the mobile bearing and the vertical wall of the tibial tray is important in preventing bearing dislocation. Separation of the bearing from the vertical wall can cause spinning of the bearing with an increased risk of subsequent dislocation. We report on intraoperative adjustment of the tibial tray performed to prevent the bearing from spinning. After tibial and femoral bone cutting and adjustment of the flexion and extension gap, the trial bearing is inserted and the bearing-vertical wall distance is evaluated before the preparation using the tibial template and bearing trial. In the case of separation, it can be resolved by medialization with or without rotational adjustment. The technique is useful and can be easily performed, it is therefore recommendable for all cases of Oxford mobile-bearing unicompartmental arthroplasty.
( Akiyoshi Mori ),( Takehiko Matsushita ),( Nobuaki Miyaji ),( Kanto Nagai ),( Daisuke Araki ),( Noriyuki Kanzaki ),( Tomoyuki Matsumoto ),( Takahiro Niikura ),( Yuichi Hoshino ),( Ryosuke Kuroda ) 대한슬관절학회 2022 대한슬관절학회지 Vol.34 No.-
Background: Our objective was to evaluate the location of popliteal artery (PA) in osteotomy planes during high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and to determine a safer angle for screw drilling to the tibial tuberosity during distal tuberosity osteotomy (DTO). Methods: Twenty knees in 20 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography for cardiovascular diseases were examined. Osteotomy planes for open-wedge HTO (OWHTO) and hybrid closed-wedge HTO (hybrid CWHTO) were created using three-dimensional bone models. The distance from the posterior cortex of the tibia to the PA (dPC-PA) in the osteotomy planes was measured in the virtual osteotomy planes. The dangerous point (Point D1) was defined as the point 17.5 mm away from PA, setting the working length of the bone saw as 35 mm. The distance between the most medial point of the tibial cortex (Point M) and Point D1 in OWHTO and the most lateral point (Point L) and Point D1 in hybrid CWHTO were examined (dM-D1 and dL-D1, respectively). The location of Point D1 to the osteotomy line (%D1) was expressed as percentage, setting the start and end of the osteotomy line as 0% and 100%, respectively. To determine the safe angle for screw drilling in DTO, the angle between the line tangential to the medial cortex of the tibia and that passing through the center of the tibial tuberosity and PA were measured. Results: In OWHTO and hybrid CWHTO, the mean dPC-PA was 10.6 mm (6.9-16.5 mm) and 10.2 mm (7.3-15.4 mm), respectively. The mean dM-D1 in OWHTO was 25.9 mm (24.6-27.2 mm) and dL-D1 in hybrid CWHTO was 5.1 mm (2.9-7.4 mm). The mean %D1 was 47.6 ± 3.7% in OWHTO and 9.3 ± 4.1% in hybrid CWHTO, respectively. The minimal angle between the two lines in DTO was 35.2°. Conclusion: PAs could run within 10 mm from the posterior cortex in the osteotomy planes of HTO. Therefore, proper posterior protection is necessary when cutting posterior cortex. An angle of less than 35° against the medial cortex line would be safe for screw fixation to avoid vascular injury in DTO.