RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Lord Jim as Modernist Myth: A Girardian Reading

        Thompson, Erik Robb(에릭톰슨) 새한영어영문학회 2014 새한영어영문학 Vol.56 No.1

        Although it is accurate to say that Joseph Conrad’s Jim in his eponymous novel Lord Jim presents a criticism of an archetype of the Romantic Genius and the gospel of individualism, it is more accurate that he presents the difficulty of mythologizing heroic individuals in a modern context. Rene Girard’s theories allow this difficulty to be examined and plotted. While Girard’s Mimetic Theory does expose the novel’s condemnation of romantic individualism, more strongly it reveals a basic understanding of the paradox of the modernist impulse in literature: narratives cannot be authentically completed to render meaningful something meaningless, yet they must be completed to re-enchant the world. At this impasse, Girard’s theories would predict that a great novel would contain the following: an object of desire, a mimetic crisis, monstrous doubling, sacrificial scapegoating and a return to social stability with the rejection of myth accompanied by an implied religious conversion on the part of the novelist. All of these things are present in Lord Jim except evidence of the religious conversion. Short of that, a Girardian analysis brings to light that Jim’s false myth is not only Jim’s falsity, but the falsity of the imperial institutions that would mythologize him.

      • KCI등재

        Cultural Not Political Colonization in the Poems of Wallace Stevens

        Thompson, Erik Robb(에릭톰슨) 새한영어영문학회 2013 새한영어영문학 Vol.55 No.1

        The reason for Stevens’ skepticism regarding cultural colonies is clear. Most of the people in America are descendents of immigrants who bring with them their own cultural ideas to a colony. That is the reality of the American situation, and it is also Stevens’ modest understanding of the reality of an America that was still in the process of trying to express its cultural relationship to the vast continent of North America. Tacit in that choice, however, is a rejection of a political solution that would preserve out-of-date cultural ideals such as that contained in the example of General Andrew Jackson, a figure who appears several times in Stevens’ poetry and prose and who was famous both for waging brutal wars against the Seminole Indians in Florida and for being a champion of a populist form of political democracy. Stevens’ emphasis on failure and division in his poems about American colonization, then, can be understood as a way to defamiliarize a political understanding of who Americans are as a peop in order to create a basis for a new modernist cultural understanding of an American place. Of the many characters and motifs that typify Stevens’ imaginary colonists in exile, I will focus on Stevens’ hidalgo figure as a unifying concept to cover all figures who fail at cultural colonization in Stevens’ poems. The term hidalgo, meaning a Spanish country gentleman, only appears five times in the corpus of Stevens’ poetry, but it can be deployed usefully to describe a colonist from a traditional as opposed to a modern culture. As the term is used here, hidalgo refers to the inhabitants (landed elites and feudal peasants alike) of a place who have acquired “tenure in the land” through generations of habits and customs cultivated in tandem with the particulars of a homeland’s culture, climate and landscape.

      • KCI등재

        Decreation: Wallace Stevens’ Theatre of Possibility

        톰슨 에릭 랍(Thompson, Erik Robb) 미래영어영문학회 2013 영어영문학 Vol.18 No.3

        이 글은 현대주의의 “역창조”에 대한 월러스 스티븐슨의 독특한 접근법을 다룬다. 그 접근법은 외부세계에 대한 첫 발상을 깨닫기 위한 목적으로 인간의 통찰력을 제거하는 것이다. 스티븐슨은 우연한 사건과 전통신화에서 타당한 근거가 부족함을 알아차린 현대인들을 위해 실재를 역창조 한다. 허구는 20세기 전반동안 살아있는 우연한 존재를 위해 창조적인 일을 했다. 그렇지만 허구는 우리와 함께 지내는 신화처럼 계속되지도 않고 지속되는 문화의 실재를 통해 예측할 수 있는 것은 더욱이 아닌데, 그러한 점이 일반적으로 허구가 가진 기본성질이다. 그리고 허구는 진리에 대한 인간 이외의 질서를 탄생시키는 것으로써 신을 대신해야만 한다. 부분적으로 우연성의 관점에 대한 이러한 역창조적 변화는 새로운 과학이론의 측면에서 이해될 수 있다.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼