사초 품질 평가 및 친환경적 초지이용

Bush Lowell 한국초지조사료학회 2002 한국초지조사료학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2002 No.1

Family Relationship Predictors of Parent-Adolescent Conflict: Cross-Cultural Similarities and Differences

Bush, Kevin R.,Peterson, Gary W.,Chung, Grace H. Korean Association of Child Studies 2013 Child studies in Asia-Pacific context Vol.3 No.1

The purpose of the present study was to examine how dimensions of socialization practice and relationship quality may function to manage or increase parent-adolescent conflict. Of particular concern was to examine the comparative efficacy of potential predictors of parent-adolescent conflict across three cultural groups consisting of samples from Mainland China, Russia, and the U.S. as well as across gender-of-parent/gender-of-adolescent dyads from each culture. Findings from a sample of 1,365 adolescents indicated that adolescents' perceptions of parental influences on parent-adolescent conflict differ across cultural groups and gender-of-adolescent. The use of punitive behavior by parents was the strongest and most consistent predictor of parent-adolescent conflict across all cultural groups and gender dyads, suggesting that a general pattern exists for punitiveness to increase parent-adolescent conflict cross-culturally. Perceptions of support, monitoring, conformity to parents, and autonomy from parents influenced parent-adolescent conflict within some of the cultures and selectively for adolescent boys and girls.

Prediction of crack trajectory by the boundary element method

Bush, M.B. Techno-Press 1999 Structural Engineering and Mechanics, An Int'l Jou Vol.7 No.6

A boundary element method is applied to the analysis of crack trajectory in materials with complex microstructure, such as discontinuously reinforced composite materials, and systems subjected to complex loading, such as indentation. The path followed by the crack(s) has non-trivial geometry. A study of the stress intensity factors and fracture toughness of such systems must therefore be accompanied by an analysis of crack trajectory. The simulation is achieved using a dual boundary integral method in planar problems, and a single boundary integral method coupled with substructuring in axisymmetric problems. The direction of crack propagation is determined using the maximum mechanical energy release rate criterion. The method is demonstrated by application to (i) a composite material composed of components having the elastic properties of aluminium (matrix) and silicon carbide (reinforcement), and (ii) analysis of contact damage induced by the action of an indenter on brittle materials. The chief advantage of the method is the ease with which problems having complex geometry or loading (giving rise to complex crack trajectories) can be treated.

Pottery as an Art: East and West

Daniel Bush 충남대학교 북미주연구소 2005 북미주학연구 Vol.14 No.-

지구 온난화지수가 0에 가까운 암모니아/이산화탄소 조합 냉동시스템

John Bush,Scott Mitchell,박창용(번역자) 대한설비공학회 2017 설비저널 Vol.46 No.4

빌립보서의 성경적 기초를 통하여 본 성도의 협력추구

Luis Bush 합동신학대학원대학교 출판부 1991 신학정론 Vol.9 No.1

US-China New Pattern of Great-Power Relations

Richard Bush 신아시아연구소(구 신아세아질서연구회) 2013 신아세아 Vol.20 No.2

The Monday Effect in the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Its Component Stocks: A Three Period Comparative Analysis from 1962 to 2012

Peter J Bush,Seyed Mehdian People&Global Business Association 2014 Global Business and Finance Review Vol.19 No.1

This article examines the Monday effect in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and each of its component stocks for the periods of 1962 to 1982, 2003 to 2008, and 2009 to 2012. We extend our investigation over multiple time periods to explore whether individual component securities behave in the same way as the broader index to which they are linked over time. The results provide evidence to support the presence of the Monday effect in the DJIA and its component stocks during the early period of 1962 to 1982 while no statistically significant Monday effect is found in the latter periods of 2003 to 2008 and 2009 to 2012. These findings suggest that a transformation has occurred in U.S. equity markets such that the Monday effect has reduced or disappeared in both the market-wide index and its component stocks. We conclude that this transformation is perhaps due to the faster speed of dissemination of information domestically or globally; consequently, no trading rule that is based on daily anomalies can be exploited to generate an abnormal return.

영원한 친구: 왜 미국의 동맹은 미국을 더 안전하게 만드는가?

리처드부시 ( Richard Bush ) 한국국가전략연구원 2017 한국국가전략 Vol.2 No.1

도널드 트럼프는 계속해서 동아시아 국가들과 미국의 동맹이 현금다툼이나 마찬가지라고 제기해왔지만 사실은 그렇지 않다. 미국이 자국을 지키기 위해 아시아 태평양지역에 군대를 배치하기로 결정했기 때문에 동아시아 국가들은 미국의 국가안보전략에 중요한 요소라고 할 수 있다. 게다가 미국의 동맹국들은 미군의 주둔에 상당한 비용을 지불하고 있으며(일본과 한국의 경우 약 50%) 그들은 자신들의 안보에 대한 일차적인 책임을 지고 있다. 미국이 "가격이 맞을" 경우에만 그들의 안보를 지켜줄 것이라고 제안하는 것은 미국의 친구들의 마음속에 우리들의 약속에 대한 의심을 가중시킬 뿐이다. United States alliances with East Asian countries are not a fight-for-cash proposition, as Donald Trump continues to suggest. They are an important instrument of U.S. national security strategy, whereby we have chosen to defend the homeland by forward deployment of our armed forces in the Asia-Pacific. Moreover, our allies pay a significant cost of our presence (around 50 percent in the case of Japan and Korea) and bear the primary responsibility for defending themselves. To suggest that the United States would help their defense only if “the price is right” only fosters doubt in the minds of our friends in the credibility of our commitment.

트럼프 행정부의 동아시아 정책의 방향과 그것이 동아시아 지역안정 및 지역질서에 미치는 영향

리처드부시 ( Richard Bush ) 한국국가전략연구원 2017 한국국가전략 Vol.2 No.2

지난 2월 3일 서울에서 제임스 매티스 국방장관은 다음과 같이 말했다. : “미국은 약속을 지킬 것이고 우리의 동맹인 한국과 함께 할 것이다. 한미동맹은 상호 헌신과 존경의 증거이며 아시아 태평양 지역의 평화와 안정의 핵심이라고 할 수 있다.” 그는 계속해서 미국의 확장억제 약속은 ‘철책’이었다고 말했고, 북한의 모든 핵무기 사용에 대한 ‘효과적이고 압도적인’ 대응을 약속했다. 4월 27일에 트럼프 대통령은 로이터 통신과의 인터뷰에서 북한과의 갈등을 종식시킬 수 있는 ‘매우 매우 중대한’ 기회가 있었다고 말했다. 그리고 그는 한국이 THAAD에 대한 비용을 지불해야 하고 한미 FTA를 재협상하거나 폐지해야 한다고 주장했다. 트럼프와 매티스의 발언이 서로 모순된 것처럼 느껴지는 것은 당연하다. 미국의 외교정책과 동맹에 대한 근본적으로 상이한 접근방식을 반영하고 있기 때문이다. 동시에 둘 다 사실일 수는 없을 것이다. 미국 당국자들은 원래의 THAAD 협정이 계속 될 것이라는 것을 소극적으로 재확인해주었지만 미국의 의도에 관한 질문은 여전히 남아있다. 솔직히 말하자면, 트럼프 행정부의 동아시아 정책이 무엇인지조차 알기 어려운데 그 영향을 파악하는 것은 더욱 힘들다. - 그 이유를 향후 설명할 것이다. 그의 동아시아 정책과 그 의미를 파악하기 위해 최선을 다하겠지만, 트럼프 대통령이 내가 말한대로 트위터에 올릴 수도 있고, 내가 해야 할 말을 대신 할 수도 있을 것이다. 다음의 여섯 개 주제를 다룰 것이다. 1. 선거기간 동안 트럼프의 외교정책적 견해 2. 과거 미국 정책과의 차이점과 지역질서에 미치는 영향 3. 당선 이후 트럼프의 동아시아 정책의 큰 변화 4. 트럼프 행정부가 시작한 갈등의 신호를 설명하기 위한 과정의 중요성 5. 미래 미국의 정책, 특히 중미관계에 대한 전망 마지막으로, 동아시아 지역의 안정에 대한 함의 On February 3, Secretary of Defense James Mattis said the following here in Seoul: “The United States stands by its commitments and we stand with our ally, the South Korean people. Our alliance is a testament to mutual commitment and respect and it is a linchpin of peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region.” He went on to say that the U.S. extended deterrence commitment to the ROK was “ironclad,” and promised an “effective and overwhelming” response to any use of nuclear weapons by North Korea. On April 27, President Trump told Reuters there was a chance we could end up having a “major, major” conflict with North Korea, that he wanted the ROK to pay the cost of THAAD, and that he intended to renegotiate or terminate the KORUS FTA. If you think that the Trump and Mattis statements contradict each other, you are correct. They reflect profoundly different approaches to U.S. foreign policy and to our alliance. They cannot both be true at the same time. Although U.S. officials quietly reassured Seoul that the original THAAD agreement would continue, questions about U.S. intentions remain. I will be frank with you. It is not easy to even define the East Asia policy of the Trump administration, much less assess its implications - for reasons I will explain later. I will do the best I can, but there’s always the chance that President Trump may tweet as I speak and supersede anything I might have to say. In the brief time I have available, I will touch on the following six topics: ㆍThe foreign policy views Donald Trump expressed during the campaign; ㆍHow those views differed from past U.S. policy, and the regional order it has helped create; ㆍThe apparent shift in Trump’s approach to East Asia after the election; ㆍThe importance of process in explaining the conflicting signals coming from the Trump administration; ㆍThe prospects for future U.S. policy, particularly our interaction with China; ㆍAnd, the implications for stability in the East Asia region.