여고생의 규칙적인 유산소 운동이 식이섭취에 미치는 영향

정연철(Chung Yeon-Chul),김태영(Kim Tae-Young),우도영(Woo Do-Young) 한국체육과학회 2005 한국체육과학회지 Vol.14 No.1

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of nutrient(carhohydrate, fat, protein and total calorie) ingestion on the aerobic exercise. For this purpose, the subjects were selected healthy 20 girls high school, while they were forced to run for 4weeks. The results of this study can be summarized as follows; There were not significant differences of carhohydrate, protein and total calorie between trained and untrained groups, but the exercise group's fat amount were significantly lowed. In particular, it was found that the amount of feed intakes was affected much by types, intensity and duration of the exercises. Now can increase the intakes of carbohydrate and decrease the intake of fat through an effective running exercise program and thereby, change our dietary patterns to the benefit of our body.

미국헌법상의 평등보호와 Pariah Principle에 관한 고찰 : Romer case를 중심으로

정연철(Chung Yeon-Chul) 부산대학교 법학연구소 2010 법학연구 Vol.50 No.1

Pariah법리는 아직 확립된 것은 아니지만 법률의 평등보호와 관련하여 특정한 계층이나 지위에 있는 자를 규제나 보호의 대상으로 하는 입법이나 정책이 행해졌을 때 그 법률이나 정책의 위헌심사의 적용을 두고 논란의 대상이 되는데, 본고에서는 동성애자의 문제를 다룬 미연방헌법판례인 합리적 기준을 적용한 Romer case를 중심으로 그 내용을 검토한 것이다. 신분이나 지위 또는 계층과 관련된 입법은 심사기준 가운데 강화된 기준으로 Romer case를 심사해야 한다는 비판이 많았고 이후 엄격심사로 기준이 강화 되었다. 현대적 반카스트입법의 형태로 알려지는데 미연방최고법원은 판례로 특정계층이나 지위를 법률로 규정하는 것은 법률의 평등보호에 위배되는 것으로 판단하여 사실상 동성애를 용인하는 형식을 취하고 있어 여러 가지로 많은 논란을 야기하고 있으나, 미국 법률문화의 한 형식에 대한 접근으로 지위보다는 행위에 관점을 두어야 한다는 것이다. This essay handles U.S Supreme Court decision in Romer case to review whether the Court opinion is correspond to Pariah Principle. If the equal protection clause means anything, it means that the government cannot pass caste legislation : it cannot create or sanction outcast group. U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that when the government treats a group of citizens as pariahs, it imposes two unacceptable harms. It simultaneously brands them as inferior and encourages others to ostracize them. The pariah principle is not, however, implicated by other forms of discrimination against homosexuals. One example is the prohibition on gay marriage. To say that gay man cannot marry each other is not to brand them as untouchables. On the contrary, untouchables are only allowed to mate within their own group. A rule that prohibited homosexuals from marrying heterosexuals would be more analogous to pariah status. The boundaries of the pariah principle are to some extent fuzzy. The factors noted in this essay can combine in various ways to produce legislation that looks more or less like the paradigm case of a scarlet letter. But there are likely to be disputes in close cases. In this article, I suggest that the decision in Romer means no more and no less then what it says that Colorado's Amendment is invalid regardless of the level of judicial scrutiny. Moreover, I contend that this conclusion does not significantly expand current law but is instead perfectly justifiable under existing precedent. The decision also does not necessarily threaten most other restrictions on homosexuals, including bans on same-sex marriage. Cultural backgrounds between U.S. and Korea are vastly different. Though korean people cannot accept same-sex marriage, we must considerate this pariah princle because Korean society varies very fastly with many different cultural-based immigrants.

Human Cloning에 관한 미국헌법학계의 논의

정연철(Chung Yeon-Chul) 한국비교공법학회 2006 公法學硏究 Vol.7 No.1

It is patent that human cloning ought not to proceed to the clinical research stage. A short teem moratorium on clinical trials of human cloning is clearly warranted on safety grounds alone, because as noted elsewhere there is no obvious pathway from animal to human research that does not involve significant risks to human subjects. As we have noted elsewhere, it is doubtful even in the long term that any individual or couple will present a rationale for the use of such technologies that is compelling enough to warrant the incumbent risks. It is also quite clear that any restrictions on research involving human cloning should be crafted carefully so as to ensure that scientific research in infertility medicine, including research on embryos, not be stifled by doctrinaire attacks on scientific freedom. In addition to technological distinctions between clones and babies of more ordinary, there would obviously be important distinctions between the social and parental roles of those who 'make' clones, and those who parent other babies. 'Strictly' speaking, it was argued early in the debate, the female donor of DNA to a clone(who gives that clone her chromosomes) is not the mother but a twin, and the father but brother-in-law. this has bearing not only on the social but also legal meanings of parenthood. e.g. would the clone inherit from the father or the grandfather? The worldwide legislative hyperventilation and U.S. Presidential declarations on human cloning followed in the weeks after Dolly's birth. The President funded a national bioethics commission to discuss cloning, which issued a fairly predictable call for a temporary ban on human cloning. Legislation to ban cloning was tabled in the House after some discussion. It began to seem that cloning was an issue that could wait, since human cloning was so much more complex than sheep cloning. This paper has a aim of introduction of American Constitutional pro-con debate on human cloning in review of related articles on them.

Human Cloning에 관한 영국의 법적 관점

鄭然喆(Chung Yeon-Chul) 한국비교공법학회 2005 公法學硏究 Vol.6 No.1

The Cloning of a Finn Dorset sheep, Dolly, on 5th July, 1996, has inevitably raised speculation about when the first human clone will emerge. The rapidity of scientific advance and in particular advance in the field of genetics and reproduction has left our moral, medical and legal categories in disarray. Not a good deal has already published on the implication of Cloning but in this article I would only attent to consider the legal implication specifically of Human Cloning in United Kingdom. The reason why I chose United Kingdom is that the technology of cloning implicated for the first time in this country. Main subjects on this article are general concept of Cloning, Human Tissue Act 1961, revision of Congenital Disabilities(Civil Liability) Act 1976, legal position of Report of the Committee of Enquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology HMSO 1984, Human Organ Transplants Act 1989, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.

美國의 立憲主義에 관한 考察

정연철(Yeon Chul Chung) 한국비교공법학회 2002 公法學硏究 Vol.3 No.2

In the American legal system, the Constitution is the fundamental legal document. All law, and in fact any exercise of public power in any form, is evaluated for validity by constitutional standards. The Constitution deals with such crucially important matters as the structure and operation of government and the fundamental right of the governed. The Constitution is also the most important symbol of American national life and the perceived repository of the most cherished values of the American people. It is often difficult for persons brought up in American legal culture to understand and appreciate the historical and contemporary importance of the cord civil in the French legal system or that of German and the relative lank of importance of the Constitution; likewise, persons educated in France or German often have similar difficulty in understanding and appreciating the centrality of the Constitution(and the role of judges in applying in Constitution) in the American legal system. Thus, the documents embodying the revolutionary programs and expressing the deepest aspirations of each society necessarily took different forms: a Constitution in the United States, with its emphasis on the separation and limitation of(public) power; and a code of private law in France, based on the principles of legislative supremacy, equality, the personal and economic autonomy of the individual, and absolute ownership and freedom of alienation of property. It is the purpose of this thesis to describe and account for the differing conceptions of constitutionalism in the United States.

헌법상(憲法上) 복지(福祉)서비스를 받을 권리(權利)(복지,福祉서비스청구권, 請求權)에 대한 고찰(考察)

정연철 ( Yeon Chul Chung ) 동의대학교 지방자치연구소 2004 공공정책연구 Vol.20 No.-

태아(胎兒)의 권리(權利)와 모권(母權)에 대한 고찰 -미국헌법상의 논의를 중심으로-

정연철 ( Yeon Chul Chung ) 동의대학교 지방자치연구소 2003 공공정책연구 Vol.19 No.-

This article handles dispute the rights between fetus and Maternity in American Constitutional Law. Rethinking of pregnancy based on a feminist understanding of connection and responsibility shifts the focus of the analysis from the conflicting rights of the mother and the fetus to their conflicting as wall as shared needs. Emphasizing needs and responsibility, this discourse refects more closely women`s experience in pregnancy than does the model of conflicting rights. Moreover, it suggests a reconceptualization of the legal treatment of pregnancy that will lead to the development of policies that promote both maternal and fetal health by expanding, not restricting women`s reproductive control. Recharacterizing the problem of fetal endangerment as one of meeting the sometimes but not inevitably conflicting needs of the mother and the fetus not only grounds the inquiry in the specificity of the women`s condition, but also expands the scope of alternative solutions. The answer to the dilemma can no longer simply to privilege either maternal or fetal rights. Rather, the solution must involve some means of meeting these needs.

장기이식에 관한 헌법적 고찰

정연철(Chung Yeon-Chul) 한국비교공법학회 2008 공법학연구 Vol.9 No.2

장기등 이식에 관한 법률이 여러 국가에서 제정 시행되고 있으나 법규정과 절차가 까다로워 장기기증이 줄어들고 있고 따라서 장기부족이 심각해지고 있다. 그리하여 장기이식을 둘러싼 여러 가지 문제 중 장기의 적출과 형성이라는 문제를 헌법적 차원에서 정리할 필요가 있다. 그리하여 일본과 독일을 중심으로 장기의 적출에서는 뇌사의 문제, 동의방식의 문제 및 그에 관련된 기본권이론을 검토하고, 장기의 형성 편에서는 장기부족을 해결하기위한 방편의 하나인 줄기세포와 관련된 첨단과학의 학문연구의 자유와 허용범위 및 규제와 한계 기타를 이론적으로 정립하여야 할 필요가 있다. 결론적으로 장기이식 논의를 헌법적 차원으로 격상시킬 것과 생명의료의 실용화에 대한 윤리강령을 새로이 확립할 필요성이 있으며 장기부족의 해결방안 모색이 강화되어야 한다. When the first modern Kidney transplant was performed in 1951, that actions sparked debate about the complex issues surrounding human organ transplantation Much of the resulting discourse was academic, however, because transplantation remained an experimental procedure for more than several decade. It was not until the 1960's ― with the discovery of immunosuppressive drugs, which dramatically improved transplantation results, and concurrent developments in the organ transplantation ― that human organ transplantation become a widely accepted therapy. Although advances in transplantation technique have markedly improved transplantation results, obtaining an adequate supply of donor organ and developing an equitable system for distributing this scare medical resource remain problematic. This article analyzes Constitutional review to resolve this problems in review of Constitutional Controversy in Japan and Germany, First part examines obtaining an adequate supply of organs. Second part analyzes artificial formation of organs including stem cell research, And last part considerate the limit and restriction of freedom of Academic research in ultramodern medical science.

급성 망막 괴사 - 4예의 임상보고 -

이재흥(Jae Heung Lee),정연철(Yeon Chul Chung) 대한안과학회 1986 대한안과학회지 Vol.27 No.6

각막궤양의 병원체 - 제2보 -

이진학(Jin Hak Lee),정연철(Yeon Chul Chung) 대한안과학회 1987 대한안과학회지 Vol.28 No.1