http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
임현진,조창근,신정강,이선주,Lim, Hyeon-jin,Cho, Chang-Geun,Shin, Jung-Kang,Lee, Sun-Joo 한국공간구조학회 2022 한국공간구조학회지 Vol.22 No.3
The purpose of this study is to evaluate seismic performances of a modular house system developed by a simple 4-clip fastening method and double metal assembly made of lightweight metals. In order to evaluate structural and non-structural seismic performances of the system. Shaking table test was carried out with full-scale modular units, and a nonlinear pushover analysis was performed to obtain suitable seismic responses for story drifts, displacements, force resistances and dynamic properties of the system. Through 3D analysis and shaking table test, the current method of lightweight modular metal unit assembly and systems with seismic performance of a 4-clip fastening type modular house were demonstrated safe and effective to seismic design.
임현진(Lim, Hyeon jin) 한국사학회 2020 史學硏究 Vol.0 No.138
본고는 여말선초 시기 對明관계를 명대에 이르러 새로이 등장한 一視同仁․人臣無外交라는 외교 관념의 형성 및 수용이라는 측면에서 살펴보았다. 명대에는 일시동인적 외교 관념에 의하여 예의를 아는 夷, 즉 제후국을 명의 臣子와 같이 대우하였으며, 명의 人臣인 제후국은 천자의 허락없이 사사로이 외교할 수 없다는 인신무외교 관념에 의하여 그 외교가 제한되었다.(Ⅰ) 고려․조선은 명의 일시동인적 외교 관념에 호응하였는데, 이는 고려가 원 복속기를 거치면서 스스로를 예의를 아는 이적[東人]으로 여겼기 때문이다. 한편, 자국의 외교가 천자국인 명에 의해 私交로 규정되어 제재를 받자, 고려․조선은 명의 외교 질서 속에서 이를 해결하고자 하였다. 특히, 조선 태조는 명의 외교 질서 속에서 자국의 위치를 능동적으로 수정하기 위하여 요동정벌을 시도하였다.(Ⅱ) This paper examined the relationship between Joseon and Ming dynasty during the late Goryeo and early Joseon periods in terms of the formation and application of the diplomatic ideology of “universal benevolence(一視同仁)” and “a vassal can not be diplomatic(人臣無外交)” which was newly introduced in the Ming Dynasty. The Ming Dynasty treated the vassal like servants of the Ming Dynasty according to diplomatic idea of “universal benevolence”. The vassal, a servant of the Ming Dynasty, was restricted in diplomacy by the diplomatic idea of “a vassal can not be diplomatic” that diplomacy could not be done without the permission of Cheonja. However, Goryeo and Joseon responded to the diplomatic idea of “universal benevolence” of the Ming Dynasty. The reason for this was that Goryeo regarded itself as a ijeok(夷狄) of courtesy during the period of Yuan’s intervention in Goryeo. Though, when its diplomacy was sanctioned by the Ming Dynasty, Goryeo and Joseon tried to resolve it in the diplomatic order of the Ming Dynasty. In particular, King Taejo of the Joseon attempted to Liaodong conquest to actively modify his country’s position in the diplomatic order of the Ming Dynasty.