http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
觀光開發效果測定의 投入-産出分析 適用 : 多地域模型의 경우
李暾宰 龍仁大學校 1995 용인대학교 논문집 Vol.11 No.-
For many countries of the world, tourism represents an important export industry contributing to economic growth and development. The economic impacts of tourism have been analyzed rather thoroughly by means of several analytical tools, among which the input-output model occupies a significant place. It is commonly known that the tourism development project, through the massive expansion in regional development, will not only contribute to activating regional economy but also have a good deal of impact to the national and inter-regional economies. Nevertheless, earlier studies have stopped short of scrutinizing the effects on the national economy while overlooking the impact that the tourism development project has on the inter-regional economy and economic disparities between investment area and other area. However, input-output analysis has been both praised and attacked as an appropriate method for assessing tourism' economic impacts. The intent of this article is to contribute to the critical evaluation of the input-output model as an useful and valid tool in economic impact analysis for tourism. Generally economic impacts according to regional tourism investment are classified to regional and inter(multi)regional effects. The input-output model assumes a classification of economic activity in a region, but region are affected each other by interregional interaction. Thus, it is required multiregional interaction analysis aimed to evaluate economic effects according to regional tourism facilities investment for activating regional socio-economic environment is than input-output analysis as a unit. Multiregional input-output analysis applied to the analysis of the economic impacts of tourism has many adventages, but suffers from serious limitations. This article reviews the literature and identifies the methodological issues in tourism input-output studies and the solutions proposed thus far. It also provides a systematic classification and discussion of new issues groused into three categories as tangible aspects : output effect, employment effect, income effect. Possibilities for improving the input-output model and limitations are discussed. Suggestions for future research include incorporating the effects of tourism induced development on regional economic structure and the economic value of intangible social and environmental impacts.
東·西洋 學問的 관점에서 본 ‘觀光學’ 論議: 學問으로의 정립과 『관광학연구』誌의 역할
이돈재,최수진 한국관광학회 2008 관광학연구 Vol.32 No.4
In this paper, two specific issues were addressed regarding the development of tourism studies in Korea; 1) Does a discipline of tourism exist?; 2) What did the 'Journal of Tourism Sciences' do for the development of tourism studies as an academic discipline? By examining articles published in both ‘Annals of Tourism Research’ and ‘Journal of Tourism Science’ from 2007 to 2008, this paper identified the differences in research methodologies and topics. As a leading journal with the longest history in tourism academic society in Korea, this study suggested the “Journal of Tourism Sciences” should define its nature more clearly and indicate its relevance to the readers, and guide them to examine a wider variety of subject areas related to the tourism phenomenon with a more solid theoretical and methodological orientation.
이돈재 한국관광학회 2003 관광학연구 Vol.27 No.2
This paper sought to identify the degree of seasonality of 18 national parks sing monthly visitors data. It also endeavored to determine whether the shape of seasonal variations(CVt) are converging, diffusing, or showing a stationary phase. Several 12 month-centered methods that have a moving average were used to remove seasonality and to find variations over periods of January 1987 thru December 2002. The coefficients of variation were adopted to discern the changing and shifting rates of national parks. The main measurements applied to the analysis were in terms of national parks, month, areas, and types of sightseeing trip. Results indicated that the amount of seasonality still exists, but its degrees or levels show a stationary phase for a few parks such as Mt. Bukhan, Keyong, which is located in the city. Likewise, exploration for Mt. Bukhan was found to project a stylized image for the park rather than that of seashore. Finally, this paper found that sightseeing of Korean national parks take place in August and October.