RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        2021년 공정거래 주요 판례 회고

        손동환 한국경쟁법학회 2022 競爭法硏究 Vol.45 No.-

        The attitude of Korean supreme court in 2021 verdict is characterized as placing emphasis on competition law regulation which is the exception of private autonomy. Ceo’s duty to monitor against cartel in the shareholder’s representative lawsuits, margin squeeze as the abuse of dominant position, the extension of statute of limitation in the Korean FTC’s fine and strict unfairness test in the cartel are all supported by the supreme court. The purpose of Large retail business act and franchise business act are supported when balancing the purpose of making the equal position between the supplier and the large business entity, franchiser and franchisee with the private autonomy. These tendencies show the awareness to economic reality and the direction of interpretation in the Korean supreme court.

      • KCI등재

        2022년 공정거래 주요 판례 회고

        손동환 한국경쟁법학회 2023 競爭法硏究 Vol.47 No.-

        If the competition law aims to properly order the national economy, it acts in reality as a modification and limitation of private autonomy. The Supreme Court's attitude in 2022 seems to be based on literary interpretation and actively utilize teleological and historical interpretations. This is due to the fact that the interpretation of prohibition of Unfair Benefits Provision to Related Parties requires unfairness requirements but only suggests that the criteria for intensifying ownership concentration through anomalous wealth transfer and the exclusion period of unfair display is viewed as the date of elimination. The concerns of the Supreme Court appear in the following points. In other words, it maintained a conventional attitude in information exchange collusion, did not recognize the effect of leniency to foreign competition authorities and denied unfairness in vertical transaction restrictions while considering the EU Gore ruling in the Gore-Tex case and Philips case.

      • KCI등재

        불안정한 하악운동을 보이는 환자에서 가철성 의치 수복 증례

        손동환,이양진,조득원,Sohn, Dong-Hwan,Yi, Yang-Jin,Jo, Deuk-Won 대한치과보철학회 2020 대한치과보철학회지 Vol.58 No.1

        Patients with collapsed occlusal support and unilateral chewing show parafunctional mandibular movements, which can be complicated in older patients. Gothic arch tracing and split cast technique are used to confirm the deviation between centric relation and anterior habitual bite in patient who has oral dyskinesia and collapsed occlusion. Temporary denture as occlusal stabilization appliance was provided for stable occlusion and reproducible mandibular movement. Definitive denture was fabricated by lingualized occlusion concept.

      • KCI등재

        찰스 디킨스의 소설 ‘두 도시 이야기’에서 재판, 자유, 정의

        손동환 한국문화융합학회 2022 문화와 융합 Vol.44 No.1

        A tale of two cities by Charles Dickens is historical and romance novel. The story of doctor Mannette and madam Defarge who experienced the pains of humanity destruction under ancien-regime askes us whether the Revolution is capable of recover their humanity and when the people who become the super majority through the Revolution can rule the society according to their value standards, whether the trial is able to be called righteousness from the grounds of the standard. The trials in this novel from the point of jurisprudence let us meditate the meaning of rule of law and minority protection in the majority standard of value ruling society. The limit of utilitarianism reveals itself on the grounds of freedom protection in the french trials against Charles Darney but the atonement of Sideny Carton which can be read as the soultion by Dickens also reveals the same utilitarian limit because he sacrificed himself on behalf of the more valuable thing. The human dignity should be the grounds for the freedom and the compassion in the logic of poetic justice suggests the possibility of justice realization. Considering the story in novels from the point of jurisprudence and justice theory can make us find out the common features between law and literature and gives us the chance of enhancing the compassion and imagination through empathy.

      • KCI등재

        호모데우스 시대에서 경쟁법의 도전

        손동환,Shon, Donghwan 국제문화기술진흥원 2021 문화기술의 융합 Vol.7 No.3

        In Sapiens it shows the reason that sapiens has conquered the earth for the invention of intersubjective reality. In Homodeus sapiens made the science revolution through the religion of humanism. The development of science showed that human free will and emotion is just made through the chemical interaction of neuron which can be manipulated and developed. Algorithm and data wlll be the sovereign which make decision in everything. Yuval Harari tells us the Homodeus appear and break down the order of equality. His anticipation proves right in competition law issues. The collusion through the algorithm makes it difficult to apply existing cartel logic. Agreement is the ground of responsibility but undertaking is not responsible in the market where sovereign algorithm decides eveything. Extreme price differentiation can appear and break down the existing market logic and competition dogma. Everything changes and it is necessary to have the flexible attitude and develop new logic.

      • KCI등재

        존 스타인벡의 '분노의 포도'에서 평등, 노동, 경쟁

        손동환,Shon Donghwan 국제문화기술진흥원 2024 문화기술의 융합 Vol.10 No.3

        소설 '분노의 포도'는, 오클라호마에서 캘리포니아로 이주할 수밖에 없었던 톰 조드 가문의 이주 여정과 캘리포니아에서의 역경을 통해 대공황 시대 미국민들의 고통스러운 현실을 보여주고, 그들의 분노에 대한 공감과 형제애적 해결에 대한 희망을 제시한다. 이 글은 각 소설적 상황을 소재로 헌법, 노동법, 경쟁법적 관점에서의 제도적 해결책을 제시하고 있다. 헌법적 관점에서 오클라호마 소작농들의 빈곤이 선택의 결과가 아닌 자연환경과 자본집중화 탓에 비롯된 현실이므로 국가가 개입하여 최저생활을 보장해주는 것이 평등권 실현이라는 점을 제시하고, 노동법적 관점에서 근로자공급사업이 노동력의 중간착취에 해당하므로 위헌이고 조드 가족과 같은 이주민들에게 노동조합을 결성할 권리가 있으며, 경쟁법적 관점에서 대지주들의 과일가격 설정이 약탈적 가격설정에 해당하고, 농장주들이 유사하게 낮은 임금을 지불하려고 하는 것이 담합에 해당한다는 점을 보였다. 이를 통해 법제도가 현재 있을 법한 대중의 분노를 해결해야 하는 수단임을 인식시키고, 소설 속 이야기가 소수자에 대한 공감과 이해를 가져올 수 있는 소재임을 보여주려 하였다. 소설 읽기가 실질적 차원의 법 해석과 정의로운 사회의 지표로서 타인에 대한 공감을 이끌어내는 방법이 되기를 희망한다. The novel "The Grapes of Wrath" shows the painful reality of Americans during the Great Depression through the migration journey of the Tom Jod's family, who had no choice but to move from Oklahoma to California and their hardships in California. This presents empathy for their wrath and offers hope for a brotherly solution. This article presents institutional solutions against each novel situation from the perspective of the Constitution, labor law, and competition law. From a constitutional perspective, the poverty of Oklahoma's smallholders is not a result of choice, but is caused by the natural environment and capital concentration, so it is suggested that the government have to intervene to guarantee a minimum standard of living to realize equal rights. From a labor law perspective, worker supply projects are unconstitutional because they constitute intermediate exploitation of labor, and immigrants like the Joad family have the right to form labor unions. From a competition law perspective, it was shown that the large landowners' setting of fruit prices constitutes predatory pricing, and the farmers' attempts to pay similarly low wages constitute collusion. Through this, the attempt was made to recognize that the law is a means to resolve the public wrath that may currently exist, and to show that the story in the novel can bring empathy and understanding to minorities. It is hoped that reading novels can be a way to help interpret the law and sympathize with others as an indicator of a just society.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼