http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
自國史와 地域史의 疏通 : 東아시아人의 歷史敍述의 省察
白永瑞(Baik Young-seo) 역사학회 2007 역사학보 Vol.0 No.196
Modem history studies in Korea have been classified into three categories; national history, oriental history, and western history. This kind of systematic classification has been contentious issues for a long time among researchers. Most of all it is contemporarily in a heated controversy in the area of history education. Recent discussions about the history of East Asia as one unit seem to follow two trends: one sees East Asian history as an extension of Korean history, while the other regards it as being beyond the boundary of Korean national history. According to the original connotation suggested by Min Ti-ki, the former can be called "self-expansive East Asian history", and the latter, "self-introspective East Asian history" Min offered a definition of self-expansive history in terms of the contribution of Korean history to the formation of regional history, and of self-introspective history in terms of the individuality of Korea in the context of East Asian history. This paper will examine Min's concepts and given issues from a critical perspective, and will present another possible way of connecting between national and East Asian history in terms of "self-extensive and introspective East Asian history". When Min uses the concept of "self', it carries a connotation of the nation of Korea itself, but I would like to widen the range of the concept farther in order to include the positive aspects of the nation and also even some subjects which argue for the abandonment of the narrow viewpoint of nation-centered discourses. This approach, which I would like to call "a viewpoint of dual periphery", is the key to establishing communication between Korean and East Asian history. It is my hope that the paper can lay down initiative foundation, so to speak, in measuring the possibility of communicative universality between Korean and East Asian history.
백영서(Baik, Young-seo) 연세대학교 국학연구원 2017 동방학지 Vol.180 No.-
필자는 디아스포라의 관점에서 ‘Korean’의 정체성을 재조명함으로써 한반도, 나아가 동아시아의 평화의 실현 가능성을 탐색하고자 한다. 주로 해외에 흩어져 있는 한인공동체의 존재에 대해 살펴보되 그 현상 자체보다는 그를 설명하는 데 동원되는 개념인 디아스포라를 축으로 담론 분석에 중점을 두었다. 이 글은, 그들의 경험을 토대로 일국적 경계에 속박된 국민적 정체성을 넘어 동아시아인으로서의 신체감각을 키우는 것의 중요성과 필요성을 제기한다. 한인공동체의 논의를 한반도의 분단체제의 극복과 숙의민주주의(deliberative democracy)의 발전, 보편적 인권의 확립과 동아시아 평화라는 큰 과제에 결부시킴으로써, 오늘날 한국인을 묻는 일의 의미가 새롭게 부각될 것으로 기대한다. By re-examining the concept of the Korean identity from the perspective of the diaspora, this article aims to explore the possibilities of bringing about peace on the Korean peninsula and East Asian peace. The study pays close attention to the existence of Korean diasporas mostly scattered abroad, with a greater focus on analyzing the diasporic discourses than on explaining the phenomenon itself. This paper suggests that it is crucial and necessary to develop a transnational East Asian somaesthesia or somaesthetic sensibility as cultivated by diasporic experiences. This approach aims to shed new light on what it means to inquire about the Korean identity by tying the issue of the Korean community to the bigger issues of the need to overcome the division system of the Korean peninsula and to develop a deliberative democracy, establish universal human rights, and build East Asian peace.