조선후기의 신라정통론(新羅正統論)과 발해사(渤海史)의 인식

김종복 ( Jong Bok Kim ) 수선사학회 2011 史林 Vol.0 No.39

There have been two different ideas to understand the time when Silla and Balhae coexisted. One way has comprehended it as ``the period of North and South kingdom``, but the other has deemed it ``the period of unified Silla and Balhae``. The term of ``unified Silla`` means that Balhae is excluded from Korean history. However, the idea of ``unified Silla`` is being still supported to emphasize the opportunity to form Korean people. The concept of ``unified Silla`` has common ground with the theory of Silla`s legitimacy prevailing in Jpseon period and ``unification of Korean Peninsula`` in modern Manseonsahak(historical studies on Mancuria and Joseon) in the way that it discriminates itself from Silla kingdom during the Three-Kingdoms era. Also, it is the same that Balhae has been ruled out from the view of ``unified Silla`` which gave the meaning to Silla`s final victory as historical milestone. Therefore, this study exmaines the development in the theory of Silla`s legitimacy and recognition of Balhae`s history to understand the current problem of dual attitude toward Balhae`s history and search for alternative. Most representative history books in Joseon period from Dongguktonggam to Dongsagangmok, which were written in the historical view with the theory of legitimacy, treated Balhae`s hisotry as a maginal country. Goguryeo was rediscovered in the external crisis after the two struggles against Japanese and Manchus. Balhae succeeded to Goguryeo began to receive attention with it. Donsa written by Yi Jong-huee completely denied the theory of Silla`s legitimacy by means of the theory of Dangun and Gija`s legitimacy. Balhaego written by Yu Deuk-gong could raise the idea of North and South kingdom era where Silla and Bahae coexisted on the Donsa`s view. With Dongsa, Dongsaganmok, the history book wrtten in theory of legitimacy, was much helpful for Yu to write Balhaego.

영어 Much of an N 구문에 대한 말뭉치 기반적 접근

김옥기(Ok gi Kim),김종복(Jong Bok Kim) 현대문법학회 2015 현대문법연구 Vol.86 No.-

Okgi Kim and Jong-Bok Kim. 2015. English much of an N Construction: A Corpus-based Approach. Studies in Modern Grammar 86, 47-70. English much of an N (henceforth, MOA) construction (e.g., It’s not much of a problem.) consists of quantifiers like much, more/less, enough, little and of-an-NP to intensify the indefinite singular degree NP. In this paper, we first review basic properties of the construction, focusing on the relation between the gradability of the NP and its predicativeness. In particular, after investigating authentic corpus data of the MOA, we provide a qualitative and quantitative analysis which allows a constraint-based approach in accounting for various syntactic as well as semantic properties of the construction.

회원의 편지

김종복,Kim, Jong-Bok 한국자연공원협회 1987 한국자연공원 Vol.37 No.-

선릉타워(조은빌딩)

김종복,Kim, Jong-Bok 대한건축사협회 2004 建築士 Vol.2004 No.8

작품노트 - 영암교회

김종복,Kim, Jong-Bok 대한건축사협회 2004 建築士 Vol.2004 No.1

시방서의 역할

김종복,Kim, Jong-Bok 대한건축사협회 1999 建築士 Vol.1999 No.5

국내(國內) 항공사(航空社) 관련(關聯) 최근(最近) 미국판결(美國判決) 분석(分析)

김종복,Kim, Jong-Bok 한국항공우주정책·법학회 2001 한국항공우주정책·법학회지 Vol.13 No.-

국제우주정거장협정의 법제도에 관한 고찰

김종복,Kim, Jong-Bok 한국항공우주정책·법학회 2007 한국항공우주정책·법학회지 Vol.2007 No.special

본 논문은 1998.1.29. 체결된 국제우주정거장(ISS : International Space Station)에 관한 정부간 협정 (IGA : Inter-governmental Agreement on International Space Station 이하 '신IGA' )의 법제도에 관한 연구로써 1) 국제우주정거장의 개요 2) 국제우주정거장 협정의 주요 기본원칙, 3) 국제우주정거장 협정의 법제도의 순서로 크게 3부분으로 나누어 고찰하였다. 첫째, 국제우주정거장의 개요에서는 (1) 국제우주정거장의 정의, 특징 및 기능과 (2) 국제우주정거장의 구성에 관하여 다루었다. 둘째, 국제우주정거장 협정의 기본원칙으로써 (1) 파트너쉽(Partnership)원칙과 (2) 평화적 이용원칙에 관하여 설명하였다. 셋째, 본 논문의 주제인 국제우주정거장 협정의 법제도에 관해서는 (1) 등록제도, (2) 관할권 제도에서 일반적 관할권 및 통제권과 형사관할권에 대하여 연구하였고, (3) 소유권 제도 중 지적재산권과 지적재산권 이외의 소유권에 관한 제도, (4) 손해배상책임제도에서 손해배상청구권의 상호포기와 손해배상책임의 제요소, 제3자에 대한 책임, 마지막으로 (5) 분쟁해결제도를 살펴보았다. 국제우주정거장 협정은 종래의 우주법에서 볼 수 없었던 새로운 법제도의 내용과 적용을 포함하고 있다. 또한 동 협정은 우주개발에 있어서 국가간 국제협력의 중요한 선례로서 하나의 Model Law가 될 것으로 보인다. 따라서 ISS상에서의 우주활동은 전체적으로는 신 IGA 법제도의 틀 안에서 규제를 받지만, 참가국과 이용자 간에는 당사자 간의 계약에 맡겨져 있기 때문에 철저한 검토가 이루어져야 한다. 또한 앞으로의 우주개발사업은 많은 중요사업에서 국제협력의 형태로 이루어질 것으로 예상되기 때문에 신 IGA의 의미는 더욱 중요하다고 할 수 있다. 본 논문을 기초로 하여, 앞으로 각 부분별로 더욱 깊이 있는 연구가 행해져 우리나라 우주개발사업의 법제도 수립에도 기여할 것을 기대한다. The purpose of this paper is to study about the legal system of the Inter-governmental Agreement on the International Space Station('IGA') which was signed on Jan 29,1998. This paper is divided into three main parts ; 1) a review of ISS, 2) the principal rules of IGA, 3) the legal system of IGA. First, the paper draws an outline of ISS by dealing with (1) the definition, characteristics, and functions of ISS, (2) the composition of ISS. Second, the paper explains the principal rules of IGA which include (1) the rule of 'Partnership' and (2) the rule of 'Peaceful Purpose'. Third, the legal system of IGA is studied by looking at five different aspects: (1) the registration system, (2) a general jurisdiction, criminal jurisdiction and a control of jurisdiction, (3) intellectual property rights and other rights beside intellectual property, (4) cross-waiver of liability and several elements in compensation of damages, (5) the dispute resolution. IGA contains new contents and applications of legal system which was not included in the former space law. Therefore IGA will work as a model law for international cooperation of space development. It is important for us to study the matter of ISS, because disputes on the ISS are left solely to contracting parties although IGA will regulate overall situations. The renewed IGA is even more important because all the space development is expected to take place on an international cooperation basis. On the basis of this paper, all the important parts of IGA is expected to be further studied so that the research can contribute to the establishment of the legal system of space development in Korea.

미국 항공보안법 소개

김종복,Kim, Jong-Bok 한국항공우주정책·법학회 2002 한국항공우주정책·법학회지 Vol.16 No.-

발해와 당의 사신 파견을 통해 본 大門藝 亡命 사건의 추이

김종복(Kim Jong-bok) 부산경남사학회 2010 역사와 경계 Vol.76 No.-

This article tries to make the exile of Tae Mun-ye be understood concretely and give answers about controversial questions up to now around it. Parts of letters involved with envoys which had been exchanged between Balhae and Tang were analyzed to complete the aim of this work. First of all, I make sure that the exile of Tae Mun-ye occurred in 726 A.D. as ever it has been researched. Balhae sent its envoy to Tang for asking to punish Tae Mun-ye in November, 726 A.D. It was the first time for Balhae to do so. Tang dynasty falsely informed Balhae that Tae Mun-ye had been banished in southern part of Tang. However, it came down to be false after Tae Nang-ah, who was Palace Guard in Tang, had contact with an official of the Court of State Ceremonial in the first half-year of 731 A.D. Balhae made a strong protest against Tang's untruth. Tang dynasty rebuffed Balhae's request by dispatching the forth envoy with the first Decree addressed to King of Balhae Tae Mu-ye in September, 731 A.D., while Tang implied it would resort to arms. At last, Balhae carried out its attack against Dengzhou in Tang's territory. Nevertheless, there had been changes in the situation; Turks fell into ruin; Khitan and Hsi surrendered to Tang. Furthermore, Silla launched military offensive against Balhae. Balhae could not stick to take its hard-line policy to Tang because of these changes in the international situation. Balhae attempted to resume diplomatic relations with Tang in March of 735 A.D., giving Tang information about Turks which planned to attack Khitan and Hsi. In addition, Balhae and Tang reopened their national friendship with the exchange of prisoners could be realized between both of them.