RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      • 좁혀본 항목

      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
          • 원문제공처
          • 등재정보
          • 학술지명
          • 주제분류
          • 발행연도
          • 작성언어
          • 저자

        오늘 본 자료

        • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
        더보기
        • 무료
        • 기관 내 무료
        • 유료
        • KCI등재

          미국 대한원조에서 미국대학들(American Universities)의 역할과 그 의미 — 시라큐스 대학과 오레곤 대학의 사례를 중심으로 —

          한봉석 수선사학회 2019 史林 Vol.0 No.70

          It is necessary to pay cultural attention to “technical cooperation” among U.S. aid to Korea in the 1950s. Components of technical cooperation include the United Nations, the Foundation, the University and the Land Grant Colleges. The school will look at two of the six universities that appeared in the U.S. aid group in the 1950s. First, Syracuse University was in charge of providing audiovisual education guidance and facilities. It was aimed at public notification, but it was not enough for the South Korean government to take advantage of it. As a result, technology transfer at Syracuse University was mainly about business. The university expanded its business to the level of enterprise at that time. This is a view of universities and other profit-making activities that are generally focused on education. Second, Oregon University was a case of colliding with the U.S. Korean aid's stance of ‘low level of modernization.' Since the mid-1950s, universities have had to focus on education projects due to changes in U.S. foreign aid. Oregon University had to do the same. However, at that time, the Korean government wanted more than a “low level of modernization” from Oregon University to develop a long-term economic development plan. However, the Public Administration Bureau of the Office for Economic Coordination in Seoul, which oversaw the university's business, did not want Oregon University to pursue development projects other than just administrative guidance. As a result, Oregon University's business was frustrated. In conclusion, there were six universities in the U.S. aid to Korea in the 1950s. These were components of technical cooperation, but were understood individually. However, they worked for profit-making and individual purposes, respectively. However, it can be said that the U.S. aid authorities failed to get out of the hegemony of the U.S. aid agency.

        • KCI등재

          20세기 포천(抱川) 조합제도의 장기사적 전개

          정승진 ( Chung Seung-jin ) 수선사학회 2020 史林 Vol.0 No.71

          According to the cultural heritage studies, rural heritages in the local society consist of natural heritage, cultural heritage, industrial heritage, and living heritage. Among them, cultural heritage is categorized to historical heritage and art heritage, the case of industrial heritage as a sub-category is divided into agricultural heritage, manufacturing heritage, financial heritage, etc. Pocheon county[抱川郡] have got the all cultural heritage as a rural region, Gyeonggi-do province, Korea. First, so-called Sanjeong-hosu [山井湖水] in located in the northern Pocheon basically belongs to the category of natural heritage, but Youngbuk Irrigation Association[永北水利組合] managing Sanjeong-hosu actually is the historical heritage as well as industrial heritage, strictly speaking agricultural heritage. Meanwhile, Pocheon Agricultural Cooperatives[抱川農業協同組合] including Gaesung Ginseng Cooperative[開城人蔘組合] is explicitly the industrial heritage(agricultural heritage). In the case of Gaesung Cooperative, it has the complicated history such like ‘Gaesung Period(1910~50), Seoul Period(1957~73), Pocheon Period(1973~present)' for 100 years or more. As time has gone on like so, agricultural association / cooperatives in Pocheon society have been the old historical heritage passing by the colonial period(1910~45). According to the latest cultural heritage studies, these industrial / agricultural heritages in local community is called “difficult heritage”, it is waiting for new 21 Century-version (=interpretation) in context of the historical studies and new style heritage studies.

        • KCI등재

          1910년대 재조일본인 정치가의 정체성 형성과정 -마키야마 고죠(牧山耕藏)를 중심으로-

          김종식 수선사학회 2016 史林 Vol.0 No.56

          本論文では、1910年代の日本の政治のもう一つの舞台であった植民地朝鮮で在朝日本人政治家の誕生過程を見てみようと思う。具體的には牧山耕藏という在朝日本人の政治家が植民地朝鮮という現實の中で日本の政治の變化に對應しながら、日本の政治家としてのアイデンティティ一を形成する過程を檢討する。論文の素材は牧山が發行する雜誌『朝鮮公論』に彼が每月書いた記事である。扱う時期は1913年の雜誌創刊期から1917年衆議院議員選擧立候補の時期までである。1910年、日本が韓國を倂合した後、植民地朝鮮に對して陸軍中心の長州閥は日本の政治の影響力から拔き出せようとし、政友會を中心とする政黨勢力は日本の政治の影響力卷の中に入れようとする目に見えない戰いが日本政界で行われていた。このような環境の中で在朝日本人社會のリ一ダ一として牧山は成長した。彼は日本に據点を置く雜誌『朝鮮公論』のメディア活動を通じて植民地朝鮮と日本に在朝日本人の通路であり、表現手段が持っていた。大正政變を通じて牧山は、朝鮮總督府と總督が日本の政治と連動されていることを自覺した。牧山は日本の現實政治つまり政黨政治勢力による立憲政治と、總督府の統制と治安維持の問題を抱えている植民地という現實の間にある在朝日本人の立場を見せてくれた。求心力と遠心力との間に存在する中間子に自分と在朝日本人を位置させた。彼は1915年の陸軍2個師團增設により朝鮮總督府の非軍事化を主張しながら、朝鮮の治安の問題も解決されて、朝鮮を日本と同じ文明的基準で支配されることを期待していた。牧山は寺內總督を日本の政治の觀点から武斷政治家、植民地朝鮮の治安維持と統治から有能な總督という兩面的な評價を下した。彼は總督の位置を日本本國の天皇に比定して、問題をその下の官僚たちの問題として理解した。植民地朝鮮の問題は妥協または解決可能なものとして把握した。第1次世界大戰により日本の中國進出政策が本格化した。牧山の寺內朝鮮總督への支持は朝鮮の治安維持という点に加え、大陸進出という側面に擴張された。最終的に彼は朝鮮を植民地ではなく、日本の領域として認識した。しかしながら朝鮮人と日本人、特に在朝日本人を文明化の程度の差で區分した。朝鮮人と區別されている在朝日本人としてのアイデンティティを明確にしめした。在朝日本人政治家牧山は植民地朝鮮を日本帝國主義の觀点から世界史的に位置させ、また朝鮮人に對する在朝日本人の優位的立場は堅持しつつながら、日本の政治と同じ立憲政治の基準で朝鮮統治が行わなければならないという考えを持ち、實踐しようとした。

        • KCI등재
        • KCI등재

          호적자료를 통해 본 조선후기 한량의 존재양상

          이동규 ( Dong Gue Lee ) 수선사학회 2015 史林 Vol.0 No.51

          In the late 17 century, it was defined that Hanryangs(閑良) were Yangban's offsprings who were preparing for the military examination(武 科). That was reflected in household register of the Chosun dynasty, which was made to control the people during the pre-modern era. However, Hanryang was the term to designate diverse classes from the late Koryo and the early Chosun dynasty(麗末鮮初). Hanryang could be retired officials or their offsprings, or could be an idiomatic word designated certain class of the public until Hanryang had its legal statue. Even during the late Chosun dynasty, both Hanryang from the national regulation and Hanryang Which was used throughout society were existed at the same time. In the earlier studies, Hanryang was understood as one of the middle classes, so it was assumed semi-yangban, and it was thought as the position which people sought to move onto the upper classes. This research tendency basically had an intention to clear up the period when it was end of the Caste system collapse and dissolution and the researchers understood the position as a class. Indeed, when you look through the historical resources published in the late Chosun dynasty, it was conflictingly described that Hanryangs were the students who were preparing for the military examination while the other Hanryangs were living idle with no jobs. So it is really hard to define Hanryang. Hanryang therefore should be analyzed from the national documents including family registers rather be analyzed in terms of classes like earlier studies. Because the opinions arguing that the position was the class is criticized and earlier studies that used time sequential research of the individuals and families from the family registers are being criticized. In this paper, I can help you understand historical Hanrang by analyzing it from governmental regulation. Also you can understand family registers and positions in late Chosun dynasty through distinctiveness and universality of Hanryang better. For this, I explained various characteristics of Hanryang, that is, who were preparing for the military examination, who were appointed as military occupations, and who became Hanryang to meet local finance and administration.

        • KCI등재

          프랑스 외무부 문서로 본 대한제국의 국제 관계

          박지현 ( Ji Hyun Park ) 수선사학회 2014 史林 Vol.0 No.48

          The objective of this article is to examine the international relations of the Korean Empire in order to understand the influence of European diplomatic foreign policies from 1987 to 1904. The documents of the French Foreign Ministry concerning the Korean Empire (1897-1904) provide clues to how the Korean Empire was affected by fluctuations in European diplomatic foreign policies. They not only track the diplomatic relations between France and Korea, but also between other states such as Russia, Japan, and these will be the focus of the article. Britain allied with Japan in 1902 and 1904 in order to block the Russo-Franco alliance. The latter may have threatened the British Empire`s influence in African and Chinese regions, and Germany refused Britain`s proposal to balance this with an alliance of their own. As such, the British Empire had to find an alternative to Germany, and selected Japan for an anti-Russo-Franco alliance. not only the result of Japanese colonial ambitions, but also the diplomatic strategy of European Empire nations.

        • KCI등재

          조선후기의 신라정통론(新羅正統論)과 발해사(渤海史)의 인식

          김종복 ( Jong Bok Kim ) 수선사학회 2011 史林 Vol.0 No.39

          There have been two different ideas to understand the time when Silla and Balhae coexisted. One way has comprehended it as ``the period of North and South kingdom``, but the other has deemed it ``the period of unified Silla and Balhae``. The term of ``unified Silla`` means that Balhae is excluded from Korean history. However, the idea of ``unified Silla`` is being still supported to emphasize the opportunity to form Korean people. The concept of ``unified Silla`` has common ground with the theory of Silla`s legitimacy prevailing in Jpseon period and ``unification of Korean Peninsula`` in modern Manseonsahak(historical studies on Mancuria and Joseon) in the way that it discriminates itself from Silla kingdom during the Three-Kingdoms era. Also, it is the same that Balhae has been ruled out from the view of ``unified Silla`` which gave the meaning to Silla`s final victory as historical milestone. Therefore, this study exmaines the development in the theory of Silla`s legitimacy and recognition of Balhae`s history to understand the current problem of dual attitude toward Balhae`s history and search for alternative. Most representative history books in Joseon period from Dongguktonggam to Dongsagangmok, which were written in the historical view with the theory of legitimacy, treated Balhae`s hisotry as a maginal country. Goguryeo was rediscovered in the external crisis after the two struggles against Japanese and Manchus. Balhae succeeded to Goguryeo began to receive attention with it. Donsa written by Yi Jong-huee completely denied the theory of Silla`s legitimacy by means of the theory of Dangun and Gija`s legitimacy. Balhaego written by Yu Deuk-gong could raise the idea of North and South kingdom era where Silla and Bahae coexisted on the Donsa`s view. With Dongsa, Dongsaganmok, the history book wrtten in theory of legitimacy, was much helpful for Yu to write Balhaego.

        • KCI등재
        맨 위로 스크롤 이동