http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
제2형 당뇨노인을 대상으로 한 당뇨 자가관리 방해요인 사정도구(DSCB-OA) 한국어 버전의 타당도와 신뢰도 검증
장선주(Chang Sunju),강경자(Kang Kyungja) 대한근관절건강학회 2010 근관절건강학회지 Vol.17 No.2
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Diabetes Self-Care Barriers Assessment Scaler for Older Adults (DSCB-OA) in Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes. Method: To develop Korean version DSCB-OA used translation and back-translation method. Then, Korean version DSCB-OA was analyzed using data of 278 older adults with type 2 diabetes. Cronbach's alpha coefficient, item to total correlation and test-retest reliability was used for the reliability test, and factor analysis was used for the construct validity. Results: Cronabach's alpha of the DSCB-OA was .77, and item to total correlation coefficient ranged from -.13 to .56. The results of factor analysis showed DSCB-OA consisted of four factors(diet, exercise, blood sugar test, treatment) which explained 62.8% of total variance. Conclusion: The Diabetes Self-Care Barriers Assessment Scaler for Older Adults (DSCB-OA) was confirmed helpful tool for Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes.
병원간호사의 한국어판 도덕적 고뇌 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도
채영란(Chae, Youngran),유수정(Yu, SuJeong),이은자(Lee, Eun Ja),강경자(Kang, KyungJa),박명숙(Park, Myung Sook),유미(Yu, Mi) 한국간호교육학회 2016 한국간호교육학회지 Vol.22 No.2
Purpose: To develop and test the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Moral Distress Scale-Revised (KMDS-R) to assess its applicability to Korean hospital nurses. Methods: The KMDS-R was articulated through forward-backward translation methods. Internal consistency reliability, construct and criterion validity was calculated using SPSSWIN(19.0). Survey data were collected from 188 nurses from a university hospital in Gangwon-do, South Korea. Results: The KMDS-R showed reliable internal consistency with a Cronbachs alpha of .69-.87 and a Guttman Split-half of .69-.82 for the total scale. Factor loading of the 21 items on the five subscales ranged from .41-.80. The KMDS-R was validated by factor analysis and explained 63% of moral distress for Korean hospital nurses. Criterion validity compared to Yoos MDS showed significant correlation. Conclusion: The results suggest promising evidence of the KMDS-R’s reliability and validity. It is used to measure moral distress for Korean hospital nurses.
한국어판 간호대학생 임상의사결정능력 자신감과 불안 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도
유미(Yu, Mi),은영(Eun, Young),White KA,강경자(Kang, KyungJa) 한국간호과학회 2019 Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Vol.49 No.4
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to adapt, modify, and validate the Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision-Making Scale (NASC-CDM<SUP>©</SUP>) for Korean nursing students. Methods: Participants were 183 nursing students with clinical practice experience in two nursing colleges. The construct validity and reliability of the final Korean version of the NASC-CDM<SUP>©</SUP> were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and testing of internal consistency reliability. For adaptation and modification, the instrument was translated from English to Korean. Expert review and a cross-sectional survey were used to test the instrument’s validity. Results: The Korean version of the NASC-CDM<SUP>©</SUP> (KNASC-CDM) was composed of 23 items divided into four dimensions: (i) Listening fully and using resources to gather information; (ii) Using information to see the big picture; (iii) Knowing and acting; and (iv) Seeking information from clinical instructors. The instrument explained 60.1% of the total variance for self-confidence and 63.1% of the variance for anxiety; Cronbach’s a was .93 for self-confidence and .95 for anxiety. Conclusion: The KNASC-CDM can be used to identify anxiety and self-confidence in nursing students’ clinical decision-making in Korea. However, further research should be done to test this instrument, as it is classified differently from the original NASC-CDM<SUP>©</SUP> version.