설계시공일괄 및 대안입찰공사의 설계심의제도 개선방안

박환표(Park Hwan-Pyo),이영근(Lee Young-Geun) 대한건축학회 2010 大韓建築學會論文集 : 構造系 Vol.26 No.5

Korean government introduced design-build delivery system from U.S.A to enhance the technical competitiveness of domestic contracts in 1975. Since then, government magnified the application of turnkey-base delivery contracts in government construction projects in 1996. So, the development of construction technology was accomplished in domestic constructors. However, Despite advantages of Design-build delivery system, many problems which has professionalism lack of design evaluation committee has occurred in the operation of design review. Therefore, this research has suggested the development of design evaluation committee to resolve this matter. First, to evaluation design-build project, this research has suggested the dedicated committee of design evaluation and to open the list of review members before the design evaluation committee. Second, to improve transparency in design evaluation in design-build projects, this research has suggested to open the results of design evaluation and to debrief the reasons for bid losers.

턴키대안 건설공사의 입찰 및 설계심의제도 개선방안

이양규(Lee Yang Kyoo),강인석(Kang Leen-Seok),김창학(Kim Chang-Hak) 대한토목학회 2007 대한토목학회논문집 D Vol.27 No.4D

우리나라는 2000년부터 턴키ㆍ대안입찰 발주물량이 급증하였으며 업체선정 및 평가과정의 객관성과 적정성확보 문제, 업체간 과다 수주와 대형업체들의 수주편중현상 등이 문제점으로 제시되고 있다. 초기 턴키심의방식은 일원화된 설계심의위원회 구성에 의해 기술평가를 통해 설계우수업체를 선정하였다. 이 방식은 설계심의위원의 공정성 및 자격성 문제 등으로 개편되었으며, 2004년 이월 01일부터 공개토론방식에 의한 기술위원회와 평가위원회로 이원화되어 구분 시행되고 있다. 변경된 방식은 현재 시행 2년이 지나면서 일부 개선된 방식으로 수정되기도 하였으나 여전히 많은 문제점을 내포하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 문제점을 분석하여 개선된 운영방식을 제안함으로서 국내 건설시장에서 턴키 및 대안 설계심의방식의 효율성을 높이고자 한다. The application of turnkey and alternative-design contracts has been increasing for large SOC projects since the practical application was revitalized by our government from 2000. Recently rapid growth of turnkey projects cause many problems such as too many contracts by large companies, increasing of design cost and excessive competition. That become an important issue in domestic construction market. The current design deliberation procedure of turnkey project is being operated by an open forum type that consists of technical committee and appraisal committee since 2004. But this system also is analyzed to be including many problems. So, This paper suggests some improvement methods and operational problems caused from application of an open forum type for selecting contractor of turnkey project. This study is intended to contribute that turnkey and alternative-design contracts can be well operated in domestic construction markets.

설계시공일괄입찰 설계심의평가 개선방향에 관한 연구

이종엽(Lee Jong-Yup),현창택(Hyun Chang-Taek),정세림(Jeong Se-Lim),조규만(Cho Kyu-Man) 대한건축학회 2010 大韓建築學會論文集 : 構造系 Vol.26 No.10

Recently, the Design Build Delivery System showing continuous increase in the bid market, nonetheless, is generating several problems such as ambiguousness of the selection criteria of the object project, inflexibility of a bid and a contract, fairness dispute of design deliberation and lobby for deliberation members, etc. To develop improvement factors about these problems, various studies have researched. However, the improvement factors are a lot, and there is a big defect that is overlapping among them. Also, there is no the opinion of business experts who have experiences having involved in design evaluation method for the Design Build Delivery System. Thus, this study carried out an important questionnaire about the improvement factors deduced through the analysis of literatures and research reports. It was carried out with the target of related business exports. To get more effective improvement factors than deduced that, the seven kinds of improvement methods of design evaluation integrally deduced through Factor Analysis were divided according to each three stages such as in the design deliberation's pre-stage, in the design deliberation stage, and in the design deliberation's post-stage.

초등 교사의 통합 교과 단원 재구성 과정에서의 집단 숙의 양상

김평국 이화여자대학교 사범대학 교육과학연구소 2011 교육과학연구 Vol.42 No.1

이 논문은 2007 개정 초등학교 1학년 바른 생활, 슬기로운 생활, 즐거운 생활의 교과용 도서에 동일한 제목으로 등장하는 “즐거운 학교생활”이라는 단원들을 초등 교사들이 통합적으로 재구성하는 과정에서 집단 숙의가 전개되는 모습과 특징을 드러내는 데 목적을 두었다. 이를 위해 문화 기술적 사례 연구 방법을 따라 숙의의 전 과정을 녹음하였고 이를 전사한 텍스트를 분석하였다. 그 결과, 집단 숙의의 내용 측면에서 주요 쟁점은 세 교과의 활동 내용들을 통합하는 과정에서 소주제들을 묶어 학교 안의 생활과 학교 밖의 생활이라는 중주제들로 구분하는 것과 그 하위에 속하는 일부 소주제들을 중주제의 경계를 넘어 이동시킬 수 있는지 사이의 갈등임이 드러났다. 그리고 숙의의 절차 측면은 설계자들이 보고, 브레인스토밍, 설명, 문제, 제안, 주장, 사례, 동조 등 의 숙의적 공헌들을 통해 이런 쟁점을 확인하고, 확인된 쟁점을 심의하고 합의에 이르는 과정으로 나타났다. 또한 이러한 과정은 숙의자들 사이의 약한 이해의 차이와 약한 갈등, 우호적인 공동체 형성을 통한 원만한 숙의, 전통과 개성에 영향을 받은 숙의, 학생을 중시하면서 학생 지도 경험, 학생 활동의 연속성, 내용의 중복 회피를 이유로 한의사 결정, 논리적 측면과 정치적 측면을 모두 보여준 숙의로 특징지어졌다. This ethnographic case study investigated characteristics of the curricular deliberation of elementary teachers in designing an integrated unit “Pleasant School Life” for first graders in the 2007 national curriculum. Data were gathered through audio taping. The main issue was a conflict between integrating several small topics into two themes and shifting some small topics from the original theme to the other theme. The teachers followed the procedure of identifying the issue through deliberative contributions of reporting, brainstorming, explication, problem, proposal, argument, and agreement; considering the relative weights of contributions; and reaching a conclusion. The deliberation was characterized as one in which teachers had mild conflicts; a smooth one in a supportive environment; one relying upon tradition and individual character; one with more emphasis upon students than subject matter, teachers, and surroundings; one in which decision making was based on teachers' experiences, continuity of student activities, and avoidance of overlapping contents; and one with both rational and political dimensions. The study suggested implications for teachers' roles in reorganizing textbooks and curriculum, and teachers' professional development based upon community building.

공공발주공사의 예정가격 결정 개선방안 - 설계가격의 작성을 중심으로 –

위승문(Wi, Seung Mun),신만중(Shin, Man Joong) 한국공공사회학회 2022 공공사회연구 Vol.12 No.4

건축설계실무와 의사결정에 관한 사례 연구 : 공공프로젝트의 경우 Case of Buchon Welfare center and Yonsu Sub-municipal Office

장성준,서윤영,이현창,하종수 명지대학교 대학원 1997 대학원논문집 Vol.1 No.-

The study analyzes a series of decisions made by Building Construction Review Committee on public building construction project. Several government authorities are engaged on the review and required the building client authority to revise the design according to revise items suggested by the committee members ranging from Architectural Planning to other Building Engineering fields. The study delves the legal and design aspects of the review, the meaning of private, semi-public and public function of building, and the construction policy. Two Public building projects were analyzed in terms of revise items. We found some patterns of problem and the current review system works to promote technical aspect of the building and to keep public entity of the projects.

턴키ㆍ대안입찰 설계심의 및 평가제도의 개선방안

박홍태(Park-Hong Tae),이양규(Yang-kyoo Lee) 한국철도학회 2011 한국철도학회논문집 Vol.14 No.1

글로벌 건설공사의 턴키설계심의제도 성과분석 및 발전방향

박환표 ( Park Hwan-pyo ),진경호 ( Chin Kyung-ho ),이교선 ( Lee Kyo-sun ) 한국건축시공학회 2011 한국건축시공학회 학술발표대회 논문집 Vol.11 No.2

공개공지 조성실태 및 이용행태 분석에 기초한 공개공지 세부설계지침 설정에 관한 연구

이종화(Lee Jong Hwa),최일(Choi Il) 대한국토·도시계획학회 2001 국토계획 Vol.36 No.1

The aim of this study is to develop the design review checklists about pubic open space attached to building. For this purpose, the design characteristics and use behavior of ten pubic open spaces located in Kwangju city are preliminary examined in detail. The design characteristics are analysed in aspects of location, size, visuality, microclimate, boundaries and transitions, seating, pubic art and service facility of pubic open space. Uses and activities within pubic open space are examined in aspects of the number of users, use time, activity types. This analysis focuses on what design factors determines the usefulness of pubic open space. Based on the results of such an analysis, we recommends the design review checklists which is including the items of basic legal requirements, location, size, visuality, microclimate, boundaries and transitions, seating, pubic art and service facility, function and activity of pubic open space.

지방건축위원회 심의제도 운영실태와 개선방안에 관한 연구

오종근(Oh, Jong-Keun),김원필(Kim, Won-Pil) 대한건축학회 2014 대한건축학회논문집 Vol.30 No.9

Architectural Committee of Local Government, which was established in 1972 to review architectural plans for the control of urban aesthetical view has still maintained for ensuring its purpose, but not corresponded to the real enactment of the legislation. Therefore, the study is aimed to examine operation of the committee’ function and to propose an improvement on the public administration of the board. Extensive research on 4 district office in Seoul suggested such substantial implementations as followings; 1) It is needed to establish clear purpose, range and standard of design review, 2) Local committee should be independently operated, 3) It is efficient that Architect is participating in design review process, 4) It is required to improve the review method, which secures enough time to check plans before reviewing, mails design documents out to each committee member before reviewing, and simple appealing process, 5) It is practical that each local government ensures exclusive staffing resource for the operation of committee and pays adequate compensation to each professional consulting by reviewers, and 6) It is recommended the law offer executive discretion power to the architectural committee. Finally the study implies that more expansion of study area on district offices and clear standard of operation for architectural committee are needed to meet the real meaning of legislation enacted by law.