http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
The Evolution of Canadian Studies in Japan: In Search of Understanding Canada
Yutaka Takenaka(Yutaka Takenaka ) 한국캐나다학회 2007 Asia-Pacific Journal of Canadian Studies (APJCS) Vol.13 No.2
Does Canadian Studies exist in Japan? It might be safer to say “no” until the early 1970s, but definitely “yes” after the mid-1970s. This paper deals with the launching and activities of the Japanese Association for Canadian Studies(JACS) and also the development of Canadian Studies in Japan from interdisciplinary perspectives. In addition, a survey of Canadian content courses in higher education is analyzed. In concluding, Asia-Pacific Canadianists should share a unique partnership with regard to Canadian Studies.
Toru TAKENAKA,Shuichi SHINDO 한국독일사학회 2010 독일연구 Vol.- No.19
Wahrend ich diesen Uberblick schrieb, habe ich mich gefragt: Wozu Deutsche Geschichte durch japanische Historiker? Ich habe nach Grunden fur die Schwierigkeiten gesucht. Es ist mir dann langsam klar geworden, dass es keinen grundlegenden Konsens fur die Aufgabe japanischer Deutschlandhistoriker gibt. Man hat zwar einen Themenkatalog, es fehlt aber die Synthetik der Geschichte (beziehungsweise die Synthetik der Geschichtsforschung). Diese Tendenz wird immer starker, weil einzelne Arbeiten immer praziser werden, mit anderem Worten: viele Arbeiten konzentrieren sich auf Randphanomene. Aber was erwarten die Kollegen in Deutschland von uns? Wie kann man die Interessen an Geschichtsforschung mit ihnen teilen? Wie bereits erwahnt wurde, ist ein Anknupfungspunkt die Arbeit zu den deutsch-japanischen Beziehungen. Und diese Methode und These kann man in einem breiteren Kontext auch fur die Erforschung der deutsch-ostasiatischen Beziehungen verwenden.
Takenaka Mamoru,Kudo Masatoshi 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 2022 Gut and Liver Vol.16 No.4
Drainage therapy for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) includes trans-papillary endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), and transgastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). With the development of chemotherapy, many MBO cases end up needing endoscopic reintervention (E-RI) for recurrent biliary obstruction. To achieve a successful E-RI, it is necessary to understand the various findings regarding E-RI in MBO cases reported to date. Therefore, in this review, we focus on E-RI for ERBD of distal MBO, ERBD of hilar MBO, and EUS-BD. To plan an appropriate E-RI strategy for biliary stent occlusion for MBO, the following must be considered on a case-by-case basis: the urgency of the drainage, the cause of the occlusion, the original route of drainage (PTBD/ERBD/EUS-BD), the initial stent used (plastic stent or self-expandable metallic stent), and in the case of self-expandable metallic stents, the type used (fully covered or uncovered). Regardless of the original method of stent placement, if the inflammation caused by obstructive cholangitis is severe and/or the patient is in shock, PTBD should be considered as the first choice. Finally, it is important to keep in mind that in many cases, performing E-RI will be difficult.
Shota Takenaka,Yoshihiro Mukai,Noboru Hosono,Takeshi Fuji 대한척추외과학회 2014 Asian Spine Journal Vol.8 No.3
Study Design: A retrospective study. Purpose: To clarify the differences among the three major surgeries for osteoporotic vertebral fractures based on the clinical and radiological results. Overview of Literature: Minimally invasive surgery like balloon kyphoplasty has been used to treat osteoporotic vertebral fractures, but major surgery is necessary for severely impaired patients. However, there are controversies on the surgical procedures. Methods: The clinical and radiographic results of patients who underwent major surgery for osteoporotic vertebral fracture were retrospectively compared, among anterior spinal fusion (group A, 9 patients), single-stage combined anterior-posterior procedure (group AP, 8 patients) and posterior closing wedge osteotomy (group P, 9 patients). Patients who underwent revision surgery were evaluated just before the revision surgery, and the other patients were evaluated at the final follow-up examination, which was defined as the end point of the evaluations for the comparison. Results: The operation time was significantly longer in group AP than in the other two groups. The postoperative correction of kyphosis was significantly greater in group P than in group A. Although the differences were not significant, better outcomes were obtained in group P in: back pain relief at the end point; ambulatory ability at the end point; and average loss of correction. Conclusions: The posterior closing wedge osteotomy demonstrated better surgical results than the anterior spinal fusion procedure and the single-stage combined anterior-posterior procedure.