http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
"KSR" 사건 분석 및 이를 통한 진보성(Non-Obviousness) 판단기준에 대한 고찰
황광연(Kwang-Yeon Hwang) 세창출판사 2006 창작과 권리 Vol.- No.45
The question presented in "KSR" case is whether the 'teaching-suggestion-motivation test' for obviousness which has been a stalwart of Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit for twenty years goes against Supreme Court precedent and results in lots of trivial patents and thus unnecessary patent disputes. Considered in this article in light of "KSR" case are what ground the 'teaching-suggestion-motivation test' for obviousness is based on, what adverse effect it has, and how to harmonize them such that the ground of the 'teaching-suggestion-motivation test' might still be followed and the adverse effect thereof might be minimized at the same time.
쌀로부터 Probable amylase / Protease inhibitor - B 단백질의 정제 및 특성연구
박근덕,황광연,이숙영,김경규,엄수현,정진하,Audree Fowler 서세원 ( Keun Duk Park,Kwang Yeon Hwang,Suk Yeong Lee,Kyeong Kyu Kim,Soo Hyun Eom,Chin Ha Chung,Audree Fowler,Se Won Suh ) 생화학분자생물학회 1991 BMB Reports Vol.24 No.3
A 9 kDa basic protein called Probable Amylase/Protease Inhibitor (PAPI) was purified from rice seeds and its complete amino acid sequence was determined[Yu et al. (1988) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 265, 466-475]. Recently its amino acid squence was found to be similar to those of phospholipid transfer proteins [Bernard and Somerville (1989) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 269, 695-697]. During the purification of PAPI from rice seeds, other basic proteins of molecular masses smaller than 15 kDa have been isolated. One of them is another 9 kDa basic protein, very similar to the previously characterized rice PAPI. Partial sequencing of the newly isolated 9 kDa protein shows that its sequence is almost identical to that of rice PAPI. Therefore, the two proteins are called PAPI-A (previous study) and PAPI-B (present study), respectively. The numbers of lysine and cysteine residues in the PAPI-B protein, determined by the electrophoretic method of Creighton, were found to be the same as in PAPI-A. The PAPI-B protein did not show any inhibitory activities against various amylases and proteases tested so far.
Effects of Oxidative-type Abdominal Curl Training on Body Composition in 30s' Men
Yong-Seok Jee(지용석),Jae-Hyeng Im(임재형),Cha-Yong Kim(김차용),Tae-Kuy Choi(최태규),Kwang-Yeon Hwang(황광연),Hyun Lee(이현),Eun-Joo Jun(전은주),Hyun-Doo Seo(서현두),Seung-Gun Im(임승건),Dong-Jin Kim(김동진),Hyun-Min Lee(이현민),Pil 한국코칭능력개발원 2004 코칭능력개발지 Vol.6 No.3
黃洸淵,羅鉉台 東新大學校 1997 論文集 Vol.9 No.-
The problem of defective security responsibility is one of the most important in the responsible legal system of civil law. About this, our present civil law has only several provisions and their ambiguity is bringing about many discussion in interpretation. about all the theory of essence is the main issue. In regard to the theory of essence, the theory of legal responsibility and the theory of the responsibility of non-fulfillment of obligation are contrasted and the former os supported incapability as a logic reason. Mainly, the theory of legal responsibility takes that of a certain subject dogma and primitive. But this causes the inconsistence with the provisions of civil law, Even though the theory is looking for the logical reason in the governer's claim night of Rome law, not inheritated historically. The theory of legal responsibility based on the law of Rome cannot admit of being applied and the theory results in the over-estimation of sellers, causing the problem of distribution of profits. Therefore, the essence of defective security responsibility should be that of non-fulfillment of obligation. If so, we can interprete indefinite subject transaction, sort-transaction, and defective security responsibility, etc. Generally and consistently and the security responsibility of all the profitable contracts can be accounted for and consistent with the worldwide legislature trend. But as an effect of defective security responsibility, there remains the problem of the range of compensation there remains the problem of the range of compensation for damage and non-fulfillment of general obligation.