http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Integrative Thinking as a Hallmark of Business Education
Ravi Chinta,Venessa Funches Funches,Hamed Esmaeilioghaz Esmaeilioghaz 국제융합경영학회 2016 융합경영연구 Vol.4 No.4
In this paper we expand on the notion of “integration” in terms of the variety of ways in which it would manifest itself in business education. Our main argument is that “integration” is multidimensional and has been manifest in pedagogy, research and service dimensions of university programs for a long time. However, assessments of “integration” efforts have been spotty thus far and only recently are being formalized. We present several examples in business curriculum and with increased focus on formal assessments of “integration” efforts, business education will become more pragmatic. The goal of this paper is to unpack the broad construct of “integration,” and discuss its historical and current manifestations in business education. Ultimately, we conclude that while the process of integrative thinking is well underway for a long time in business education, the assessment of outcomes of integrative thinking is just taking root through formal ETS tests. We believe that integrative thinking in business education is an ultimate indicator of the effectiveness of the business curriculum, as students skilled in this area will be best prepared for the real-life jobs in the market place.
( Jammula Surya Prasanna ),( Chinta Sumadhura ),( Parupalli Karunakar ),( Naineni Rohini ) 대한폐경학회 2017 대한폐경학회지 Vol.23 No.1
Objectives: Neopterin is a valuable diagnostic biomarker, which is elevated in inflammatory conditions like periodontitis, that is characterized by destruction of the supporting structures of the teeth. Among the biomarkers, neopterin occurs in body fluids, and acts as a diagnostic marker for present and future disease activity. Methods: Thirty female subjects with chronic periodontitis, mean age 50 years (40-60 years) were included in this study. Depending upon their menstrual history, subjects were categorized into two groups of fifteen each. Group I 15 pre-menopausal women, and Group II 15 post-menopausal women. Saliva was collected, and neopterin levels were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in both the groups, at base line and after three months of nonsurgical periodontal therapy (NSPT). Periodontal parameters like pocket probing depth (PD) and Russell`s periodontal disease index (PDI) were assessed before treatment as well as after three months of scaling and root planning. Results: Intra group analysis showed significant markdown in the mean values of all the parameters from baseline to three months (P < 0.001), for all patients. The intergroup comparison, from baseline to 3 months also showed no significant change in PD and PDI values, but there was a statistically significant difference in the salivary neopterin levels (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Neopterin levels were found to be reduced in three months after NSPT in both the groups, suggesting that the NSPT is the gold standard therapy, and also that neopterin levels in saliva can be used as an indicator to identify periodontal inflammation and destruction. (J Menopausal Med 2017;23:32-41)
( Jammula Surya Prasanna ),( Chinta Sumadhura ),( Parupalli Karunakar ) 대한폐경학회 2017 대한폐경학회지 Vol.23 No.3
Objectives: The influence of sex steroid hormones on periodontium can be knockdown with good plaque control. The aim of the present study was to evaluate periodontal status in pre- and postmenopausal women with periodontitis following non-surgical therapy. Methods: Total 60 female patients’ periodontal status was measured by periodontal index (PRI), and oral hygiene status was measured by plaque index (PI). Both the parameters were measured at baseline i.e. before scaling and root planing and after 3 months intervals post treatment. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21. Results: The mean PRI scores in premenopausal group were 5.68 ± 0.64 and 2.53 ± 0.13, and PI scores were 1.84 ± 0.17 and 0.91 ± 0.13 respectively at baseline and 3 months. The mean PRI scores in postmenopausal group were 6.08 ± 0.46 and 2.55 ± 0.12, and PI scores were 1.86 ± 0.24 and 1.00 ± 0.24 respectively at baseline and 3 months. Conclusions: There was more desirable response to non-surgical periodontal therapy in both the groups but not significant variation in between two groups. (J Menopausal Med 2017;23:202-209)