http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
방적성 Plasma 처리 필름으로 피복된 플라스틱온실의 풋고추 생육
전희,김경제,김진영,김현환,이시영,Chun, Hee,Kim, Kyung-Je,Kim, Jin-Young,Kim, Hyun-Hwan,Lee, Si-Young 한국생물환경조절학회 2000 생물환경조절학회지 Vol.9 No.3
The Plasma film treated with a high electric voltage was developed to enhance flow down of condensation drops on inside plastic film. Arch type greenhouse framed with iron pipe of 25mm diameter defand 1.5mm thickness were covered with either the developed plasma film or surfactant film(control). Green pepper seedlings raised for 40 days in plug trays were transplanted at a density of 110cm by 30cm in each greenhouse. The mount of condensational water on film surface, generated by 7$0^{\circ}C$ water bath chimney systems and flew down, was collected and measured. The amount of collected water after 150 minutes was 2.56 mL.100c $m^{-2}$ and 0.94mL.100c $m^{-2}$ , respectively, in the plasma film and surfactant film-covered greenhouses. The amount of condensational water drops attached on the cover at 08:20 a.m. at 60 days filter covering was 0.34mL.100c $m^{02}$ and 0.32mL.100c $m^{-2}$ , respectively, in the plasma film- and surfactant film-covered greenhouses. Solar irradiance transmitted into greenhouse was 2.0% higher in the greenhouse covered with the plasma film tan that in the greenhouse covered with the surfactant film. Air temperature in the plasma film-covered greenhouse was higher than the surfactant film-covered greenhouse by 0.5$^{\circ}C$. However, there was no difference in relative humidity between the two greenhouse. Plant height, leaf area, dry weight and early yield showed no significant differences.s. 플라즈마 필름은 플라스틱 필름 표면의 유적성을 향상시키기 위하여 고전압처리 되었다. 플라즈마 필름과 계면활성제 필름(대조구)를 각각 직경 25mm 두께 1.5mm 골조 파이프 하우스에 피복하였다. 또한 40일 플러그 육묘된 풋고추를 110cmx25cm 간격으로 정식하였다. 피복시 수온을 7$0^{\circ}C$로 처리된 수적발생 장치에서 나온 수증기가 필름 표면에서 응결되어 흘러내려 비이커에 모인 양을 150분 후에 측정한 결과, 플라즈마 필름에서 2.56mL.100$cm^{-2}$ , 계면활성제 필름에서 0.94mL.100$cm^{-2}$ 이 나왔다. 피복 60일 후 오전 8시 20분에 시설내 필름 표면에 부착된 수적량은 플라즈마 필름에서 0.34mL.100$cm^{-2}$ , 계면활성제필름에서 0.32mL.10$cm^{-2}$ 이었다. 광 투과율은 플라즈마 필름 피복시설이 계면활성제 피복시설 보다 2.0% 높았다. 그리고 시설내 기온은 플라즈마 필름 피복시설이 계면활성제 피복시설 보다 0.5$^{\circ}C$ 높았다. 그러나 상대습도는 차이가 없었다. 풋고추 초장, 엽면적, 건물중 및 초기수량 또한 처리간에 차이가 없었다.
CEM BIO Film 피복시설의 환경특성과 풋고추 생육
전희,김경제,권영삼,김현환,이시영,Chun, Hee,Kim, Kyung-Je,Kwon, Young-Sam,Kim, Hyun-Hwan,Lee, Si-Young 한국생물환경조절학회 2000 시설원예‧식물공장 Vol.9 No.3
CEM BIO P.E.필름으로 피복된 시설에서 300~1,100nm 사이의 분광투과율은 일반 P.E. 필름으로 피복된 시설보다 높았다. 전반적으로 시설내 광투과율은 이중피복, 골조, 기타시설물 때문에 노지에 비하여 절반 수준을 나타냈다. 순복사량은 CEM BIO P.E. 필름 피복시설이 5,424.5W.m$^{-2}$ 로서 일반 P.E.필름 피복시설보다 2.9% 낮았고, 광합성유효복사 투과율은 CEM BIO P.E.필름 피복시설이 3,861.2W.n$^{-2}$ 로서 일반 P.E. 필름 피복시설보다 3.8% 높았으며, 무가온기의 적산최저온도는 CEM BIO P.E. 필름 피복시설이 일반 P.E. 필름 피복시설보다 1일 평균 0.35$^{\circ}C$ 높았다. 정식후 30일의 풋고추 생육은 CEM BIO P.E. 필름 피복시설에서 초장, 경경, 엽면적, 생체중, 건물중 및 군락생산구조가 우수하였고, 과실은 과중이 11.28g으로 일반 P.E. 필름 피복시설 보다 1.25g 무거웠으며, 상품율은 2.7% 높았다. 1997년 11월 19일부터 1998년 3월 3일 사이의 수량은 CEM BIO P.E. 필름피복시설에서 7.4% 많았으나 전체적인 수량은 차이를 보이지 않았다. Spectroradiometric light transmittance from 300 to 1,100nm in the greenhouse covered with the CEM BIO polyethylene film was greater than that in the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film (control). As a whole, solar radiation transmittance into greenhouse was a half level, due to shades caused by double layer covering, frame and equipment. Net radiation energy emitted throughout surface of the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film was 5,424.5W.m$^{-2}$ , which was lower by 2.9% as compared to that of the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film. Photosynthetically active radiation from 400 to 700nm of the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film was 3,861.2W.m$^{-2}$ , which was higher by 3.8% as compared to hat of the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film. Accumulated minimum air temperature from Oct. 7, 1997 to Oct. 16, 1997 of the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film was 100.5$^{\circ}C$, which was higher by 2.5$^{\circ}C$ as compared to that of the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film. As results, height, stem diameter, leaf count, leaf area, fresh weight and dry weight of green pepper plants and canopy production structure measured at 30 days after transplanting were enhanced. Mean fruit weight n the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film was 11.28 g and 1.25 g greater as compared to that in the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film, due to increased fruit diameter and flesh thickness. Percent marketable fruits produced in the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film were 96.1%, and was greater by 2.7% thant that of the greenhouse covered with polyethylnee film due to decreased infection, sterility, severe curve and twisted fruits. The green pepper yield of the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film from Nov. 19, 1997 to Feb. 3, 1998 was greater by 974 kg per hectare than that of the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film, but the total fruit had no difference.