우리나라 수출입 물동량의 구조분석과 향후 5년의 시계열 예측에 관한 연구

장문철 ( Chang Moon Chul ) 한국유통경영학회(구 한국유통정보학회) 2010 유통정보학회지 Vol.13 No.4

온라인 도메인이름분쟁조정제도 도입에 따른 법령,세칙 개정 필요성 연구

장문철 ( Moon Chul Chang ) 안암법학회 2012 안암 법학 Vol.0 No.37

Korean Internet Address Dispute Resolution Committee (KJDRC) now plans to introduce its own ODR platform on the website and to revise its supplemental rules for the domain name dispute resolution soon. Since ICANN revised Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) on March 1, 2010 to introduce Paperless Dispute Resolution or eUDRP procedure, KJDRC has established the method of transmitting and exchanging electronic documents by email. However with developing internet technology in domestic litigation and ADR, KIDRC has been expected to introduce the ODR system. Soon parties could submit the complaint or the reply online and panelists could render their decision on the online platform. This paper will discuss on the revision of rules for the Domain Name Dispute Resolution to introduce ODR Platform to KIDRC`s website. The first chapter will examine the function and salient features of the ODR method by comparing with ADR method. The second chapter analyzes the characteristics of electronic UDRP procedure after which was modelled by the KJDRC`s procedural rules. The third chapter will focus on how the KIDRC will operate the ODR system and how parties and panelists could use it to resolve the domain name disputes. The fourth chapter will analyze the ()DR systems and its supplemental rules of WIPO, NAF, ADNDRC and ADR.eu. Finally the last chapter will suggest which provisions should be modified, revised or added on the current rules and supplemental rules for Internet Address Dispute Resolution. In order for K1DRC to establish paperless electronic procedure and the ODR system in efficient and economic manner this paper proposes the followings. First parties and panelists are allowed to use email or ODR platform only to submit, transmit or exchange documents while traditional mail or cornier are no more allowed to use. This could help the procedural economic and administrative convenience, Secondly, as ODR rules of the four major gTLD domain name dispute resolution service providers suest, the revision of rules for online domain name dispute resolution should be least limited and the principle of party autonomy should be most allowed on the procedural issues. For this principle ODR User`s Manual or FAQ service for ODR arc desirable to guide parties arid panelists. Finally it is considered to be timely and expected successful that KIDRC plans to implement ODR system for domain name dispute resolution since major domain name dispute resolution service providers has already established it.

北韓의 國際私法

張文哲(Chang, Moon-Chul) 법무부 국제법무정책과 2000 통상법률 Vol.- No.36

설비중심의 간접경비 배부시스템에 관한 연구

장문철(Moon Chul Chang),함효준(Hyo Joon Hahm) 대한설비관리학회 1999 대한설비관리학회지 Vol.4 No.4

N/A Since the traditional costing system is based partly on operational rate, it results in a distortion in costs when the allocation of manufacturing indirect cost is concerned. In consideration of recent facility automation and diversification in products,

사회적기업의 사례분석을 통한 사업모델구축에 관한 연구

주상호 ( Sang Ho Ju ),장문철 ( Moon Chul Chang ) 한국유통경영학회(구 한국유통정보학회) 2013 유통정보학회지 Vol.16 No.6

본 연구는 기존연구를 통하여 사회적기업의 사업모델과 그 구성체계 분석에 필요한 연구모형을 도출하고, 사례대상 사회적기업의 사업모델의 특징을 탐색하여 분석한 것이다. 본 연구에서는 사회적기업의 구성체계로 제시한 제품 및 서비스의 제공자,제품 및 서비스의 제공가치, 목표고객, 수익 등을 중심으로 사업모델을 분석하였으며, 부가적으로 사업구조와 성장원리를 분석하여 제시하였다. 사례기업의 분석결과, 구성체계와 지속가능성 측면에서 모방이 불가능한 조직문화, 사업기술 개발을 통한 핵심역량 확보, 외부 협력체제 구축, 경험과 사회적 기업가정신 등으로 제품 및 서비스의 생산자나 제공자의 역할을 수행하고 있음을 알 수 있다. 그리고 목표시장의 차별화와 외부협력망의 활용으로 자원 및 자금의 한계를 극복할 수 있었다. 본 연구의 모형을 통하여 제시된 사회적기업 사업모델은 기업의 분석틀로 활용되어 육성 및 투자와 지원이 필요한 사회적기업의 선정 및 활용 도구로 적용할수 있다 . 그리고 지속가능성과 경쟁우위의 경영이 가능하도록 사업모델 평가 및 발굴에 활용할 수 있다는 데 의의가 있다. The study draws a business model of a social enterprise and a study model which is necessary for analyzing the organization system, and analyses the features of the business model through existing researches. The study also analyses the business model, focusing organization systems of the social enterprise such as providers of products and service, value of offering products and service, target customers, and profit, and suggests business structure and growth principle. It shows the fulfillment in manufacturer of products and service or provider role through the analysis result about the case study object, the organization system, organization culture which is impossible to copy in the aspect of sustainability and securing core competencies by technology development, formation external collaboration system, experience and social entrepreneurship. It was possible to recover limits to resources and funds by usage of differentiated target market and external collaboration. The social enterprise business model on this study is used as an analysis tool of enterprise so it is applicable to both of selecting and utilizing tools of a social enterprise which needs investment and support. It is also applicable to evaluating and discovering a business model for sustainability and competitive advantage management.

캐나다의 도메인이름중재제도

장문철 韓國仲裁學會 2004 중재연구 Vol.13 No.2

On June 27, 2002 Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA) launched dot-ca domain name dispute resolution service through BCICAC and Resolution Canada, Inc. The Domain name Dispute Resolution Policy (CDRP) of CIRA is basically modelled after Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy(UDRP), while the substance of CDRP is slightly modified to meet the need of Canadian domain name regime and its legal system. Firstly, this article examined CIRA's domain name dispute resolution policy in general. It is obvious that the domain name dispute resolution proceeding is non-binding arbitration to which arbitration law does not apply. However it still belongs to the arbitration and far from the usual mediation process. Domain name arbitrators render decision rather than assist disputing parties themselves reach to agreement. In this respect the domain name arbitration is similar to arbitration or litigation rather than mediation. Secondly it explored how the panels applied the substantive standards in domain name arbitration. There is some criticism that panelists interprets the test of "confusingly similar" in conflicting manner. As a result critics assert that courts' judicial review is necessary to reduce the conflicting interpretation on the test of substantive standards stipulated in paragraph 3 of CDRP. Finally, it analysed the court's position on domain name arbitral award. Canadian courts do not seem to establish a explicit standard for judicial review over it yet. However, in Black v. Molson case Ontario Superior Court applied the UDRP rules in examining the WIPO panel's decision, while US courts often apply domestic patent law and ACPA(Anticyber -squatting Consumer's Protection Act) to review domain name arbitration decision rather than UDRP rules. In conclusion this article suggests that courts should restrict their judicial review on domain name administrative panel's decision at best. This will lead to facilitating the use of ADR in domain name dispute resolution and reducing the burden of courts' dockets.

활동기준원가의 보완을 위한 공정기준원가에 관한 연구

張文喆 대한설비관리학회 1999 대한설비관리학회지 Vol.4 No.1

Yet Activity-Based Costing lacks a process orientation, lacks a customer focus, and fails to the cost behavior function with the interrelated nature of activities. Process-Based Costing is a new methodology to overcome these shortcomings in a continuously improving organization. Process Cost Management emphasizes operational decision making by simulating the resource consumption levels for future process and product configurations based on cost driver relationships that are derived from product attributes and process parameters

UNCITRAL 모델중제법이 캐나다 중제법에 미친 영향

장문철 한국캐나다학회 1998 캐나다논총 Vol.4 No.-

Party Autonomy in Korean and U.S Court-Annexed Mediation System

Chang, Moon-Chul 한국중재학회 2007 중재연구 Vol.17 No.2

최근 한국과 미국 법원에서는 조정제도를 자주 이용하고 있다. 조정제도를 이용함으로써 법원은 사건부담을 줄일 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 소송지연을 막고 비용을 절감할 수 있다. 그러나 조정계도의 장점을 극대화하기 위해서는 일반 조정제도의 기본원칙인 당사자원칙을 최대한 반영하고 법원의 개입은 제한하여야 할 필요가 있다 이점에 있어 미국과한국의 법원내 조정제도에 비교해볼 때, 전자가 법원의 개입은 필요한 최소한에 그치고조정인과 분쟁당사자간의 당사자자치를 최대한 보장하고 있음을 알 수 있다. 이 글은 한국과 미국의 법원내 조정제도를 비교 분석하여 효과적인 법원내 조정제도를 정착시키기 위하여 개선해야 한 점을 제시하고자한다. 한국과 미국의 법원내 조정제도의 근본적인 차이는 조정절차진행에서 법원의 역할과 관련되어 있다. 특히 미국법원은 분쟁 당사자들 스스로 분쟁해결을 할 수 있도록 돕는 역할에 주력하는 반면, 한국법원은 조정절차 전 과정에서 분쟁해결에 적극 개입한다. 보다 공정하고 효율적인 민사조정절차를 위해서는 관련법의 정비뿐만 아니라 조정인의 교육과 전문성을 강화하기 위한 제도적 장치를 마련할 필요가 있다.