http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이원빈(Lee, Wonbin) 새한영어영문학회 2015 새한영어영문학 Vol.57 No.4
In this paper, we will explore the syntactic structure of double object and prepositional dative constructions in English and argues that the two constructions are derived from the same underlying structure rather than the separate syntactic structure. First, we consider the semantic structure of the two constructions and argue that the different semantic representations come from the property of the verb itself, rather than the syntactic structures. Second, we explore the underlying structure of the two constructions and propose they are derived from the same underlying structure. Finally, we attempt to show how the two different structures are derived from the same underlying structure in the narrow syntax.
이원빈(Lee, Wonbin) 새한영어영문학회 2013 새한영어영문학 Vol.55 No.1
This paper explores double object constructions in English centering around the asymmetric property of the indirect object movement. The A-movement of the indirect object in double object constructions is allowed, whereas the A’-movement of the indirect object is blocked. The asymmetric property of the indirect object movement is captured from the fact that the indirect object in double object constructions in English is interpreted as topic (i.e., old information). Following Lee (2004), I propose that the indirect object must move out of vP to receive the appropriate interpretation (i.e., topic) clause-internally. The freezing effect of the A’-movement of the indirect object is due to this clause internal topicalization of the indirect object.
Adjunct Condition Effects in English Revisited
이원빈(Lee, Wonbin),권기양(Kwon, Kiyang) 새한영어영문학회 2012 새한영어영문학 Vol.54 No.2
This paper discusses transfer-based analysis of adjunct condition effects in English, paying particular attention to the claim that difference in extractability from adjuncts depends on the possibility of single-event reading of the whole VP to which an adjunct is adjoined. The central idea presented here is that extractability out of adjuncts depends on the timing of Transfer. When adjuncts are adjoined before Transfer, extraction from adjuncts is allowed. When adjuncts are late-merged after Transfer, on the other hand, extraction from adjuncts is not permitted since adjuncts are not invisible to the narrow syntactic operations like wh-movement.
이원빈(Lee, Wonbin) 새한영어영문학회 2014 새한영어영문학 Vol.56 No.3
This paper explores VP-ellipsis and Focus phenomena in English. Contra Johnson (2001) and others, this paper shows that VP-ellipsis and VP-topicalization are not the same operation and VP-ellipsis is derived from an independent operation to rescue the otherwise crashed derivation at the C-I interface as a repair strategy. Following the notion of Focus Domain put forward by Lee (2004), this paper argues that VP containing [+Top] adopts one of the following two strategies: clause-internal topicalization or VP-ellipsis triggered by [+E] of Top. (Daejeon University)
이원빈(Lee, Wonbin),권기양(Kwon, Kiyang) 새한영어영문학회 2020 새한영어영문학 Vol.62 No.3
This paper explores the recent MERGE-based theory proposed by Chomsky (2019a, b, c) and Chomsky et al. (2019) in terms of determinacy. The latest version of the minimalist theory tries to pave the way for genuine explanation of human language faculty, I-language, without resort to the principles specific to the faculty of language. Based on the language-independent principles such as determinacy, restrict resources, etc., this paper attempts to show that the minimalist theory has a genuinely explanatory power to shed light on the essence of language in a principled way not peculiar to human language. By examining the extraction from the complement NPs, we consider how the recent proposals put forward by Chomsky (2019a, b, c) and Chomsky et al. (2019) make a contribution to establishing the principles of efficient computation for human language.
이원빈(Lee, Wonbin),권기양(Kwon, Kiyang) 새한영어영문학회 2020 새한영어영문학 Vol.62 No.4
This paper aims to capture the nature of tough-constructions in English. To deal with the nature of tough-constructions, two main approaches, a movement-based approach on the one and a base-generation approach on the other, are put forth in the literature. Centering around the issue of the asymmetry of PP intervention effects in tough-constructions, we will propose an alternative syntactic approach based on the argument structure of tough-predicates and CP-predication. The proposed approach has shown that the intervention effects of PP in touch-constructions result from the different argument structure of tough-predicates, rather than from the nature of PP argument in tough-constructions. Finally, we will show that our approach can explain the nature of tough-constructions properly and resolve the problem with the previous approaches with regard to PP intervention effects in tough-constructions.