http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
汉语“有”字句的句式及其韩语对应形式分析 ― 以语义对应为中心
袁立秋(Yuan Liqiu) 중국어문학연구회 2020 중국어문학논집 Vol.0 No.125
This paper first makes a comprehensive and systematic summary of the ‘you’ sentence in modern Chinese, and then focuses on semantic meaning analyzed the ‘you’ sentence from the perspective of comparative analysis between Chinese and Korean. The conclusions of this paper are as follows: First, the overall syntactic features of modern Chinese sententious can be divided into "you" sentence with subject and "you" sentence with no subject. Meanwhile, the "you" sentence can be divided into 7 categories according to the semantic meaning, such as subordination, possession, existence, variation, inclusion, estimation and achievement. Second, there are mainly six types of semantic correspondence between modern Chinese "you" sentence and Korean. It is hoped that this research will provide help for Korean students" learning of "you" sentences and help Chinese teachers to better arrange grammar teaching materials and teaching programs for Korean students.
정도 범주의 등급 및 ‘유(有)자 정도구조’의 정도 등급 표시 기능
袁立秋 ( Yuan Liqiu ) 한국중국언어학회 2021 중국언어연구 Vol.- No.94
This paper sets up the grade of degree category and analyzes the marking function of degree grade of the “You” structure. Firstly, according to the syntactic expression form of degree category, this paper divides degree category into four grades: lowest measurement, medium measurement, highest measurement and extremely measurement. Each grade can be subdivided into four grades, and so on, there are 16 grades together. “You dianr, Youxie” by itself denote the lowest measurement, “you+NP” by itself also means the same grade of measurement, Meanwhile, when the structure of “you+NP” combine with different degree adverbs, it can indicate a medium measurement which denotes the lowest of measurement, or a highly measurement which denotes the lowest of measurement and an extremely measurement which denotes of the lowest of measurement. The structure of “有X有Y” and “有的是X” denote the highest measurement, the figurative form of “有X那麽A” denote an extremely measurement, and the comparative form denotes the four grades of measurement.
袁成(Yuan Cheng),袁立秋(Yuan Liqiu) 중국어문학연구회 2020 중국어문학논집 Vol.0 No.123
A number of collections of Chinese poems may take in surrounding countries’ poems written in Chinese, especially korean poems written in Chinese. Zhu Yi-zun used to apply many kinds of Korean documents to Mingshizong. Compared with other collections of Chinese poems, Mingshizong contained much more information about korean poems written in Chinese. And then as soon as Mingshizong was spread into the Korean Peninsula, it was commented and cited by Korean scholars. Firstly, Chinese poems sprang up on the Korean Peninsula. Secondly, Chinese scholars take them in the collections of Chinese poems. Finally, Korean scholars gave the feedback on these collections. The progress vividly showed the interactive communications between Chinese literature and Korean literature in history.
現代中國語 程度副詞 ‘有’字 形式 用法의 量的 分析 - ‘有點’과 ‘有些’를 中心으로
金鉉哲(Kim, Hyun-cheol),袁立秋(Yuan Liqiu) 중국어문학연구회 2021 중국어문학논집 Vol.0 No.126
On the basis of corpus statistics, this paper will analyze the adjectives, verbs or verb phrases that can be matched with the degree adverbs of "youdian, youxie" from the perspective of "quantity". According to the statistics in the literature field of BCC corpus, it is easier for "youdian" and "youxie" to combine with disyllabic adjectives, followed by monosyllables. The reason for this phenomenon is the restriction of syllables, because "youdian, youxie" are disyllabic. The reason why the high-quantity qualitative adjectives, the overlapped qualitative adjectives, state adjectives can be combined with the degree adverb of "you" is because the small quantity extent can be subdivided again. The verb phrases combined with "youdian" have [+character meaning], [+degree meaning] and [+negative meaning], While "youxie" is not restricted by the negative meaning, only has [+character meaning] and [+degree meaning].
金鉉哲(Kim, Hyun-cheol),袁立秋(Yuan Liqiu) 중국어문학연구회 2021 중국어문학논집 Vol.- No.127
This paper analyzes the characteristics of degree category and the degree quantity expressed by the characteristics, and also analyzes the degree quantity marker function of the ‘you’ degree structure. The characteristics of degree category are hierarchy, subjectivity and fuzziness. Firstly, the hierarchical characteristics are semantically reflected in the degree of dispersion and degree of solidification. Whether a certain structure is modified by degree adverb as a standard to analyze, ‘有+NP’ to express the degree of dispersion, in contrast, ‘有X有Y’, ‘有的是X’ and ‘有X那麽A’ express the degree of solidification. Secondly, the characteristics of subjectivity are semantically reflected in subjective degree and objective degree. Analyzing with the object of comparison as the standard, ‘有點, 有些’ represents the subjective degree, while ‘有的是X’, ‘有X有Y’ and ‘有X那麽A’ represent the objective degree. Thirdly, the characteristics of fuzziness are semantically reflected as the degree of vagueness and the degree of certainty. In terms of the magnitude and point of expression as the standard to analyze, ‘有+NP’ express the degree of vagueness, ‘有點, 有些’, ‘有X有Y’, ‘有的是X’ and ‘有X那麽A’ express the degree of certainty.
하천(He, Qian)(何倩),뇌정(Lei, Ting)(雷婷),원립추(Yuan, Li-Qiu)(袁立秋) 대한중국학회 2020 중국학 Vol.70 No.-
Based on the interaction between construction and causative words, this paper explains the reasons for the diversity of causative words in the construction of causative words. This paper refers to Goldberg’s construction diagram and summarizes the interaction schema between the causative construction argument and the actor role of causative words. In this paper, relevant examples are used to explain the principle of the integration of the constructional elements of causative words and the roles of participants in causative words. On the basis of the fusion principle, this paper analyzes how the causative construction chooses and limits the actor role of causative words. This paper also makes a detailed summary of the fusion law between the causative constructors and the participants of causative words. 本文以致使性“得”字句為研究對象, 從構式與致使詞的互動角度出發, 對致使性“得”字句構式中致使詞多樣性的原因作出了解釋。首先參考Goldberg的構式圖, 總結了致使性“得”字句構式論元與致使詞的參與者角色的互動圖式。其次, 運用相關例句詳細闡釋了致使性“得”字句構式論元與致使詞的參與者角色的融合原則。在融合原則的基礎上, 分析了致使性“得”字句構式是如何對致使詞的參與者角色進行選擇和限制的。此外, 致使性“得”字句包含的事件數量的不同會影響構式論元與致使詞參與者角色的融合過程, 本文對不同事件數量的致使性“得”字句構式論元與致使詞參與者角色的融合規律也進行了詳細地總結。