논문 : 형사절차에서 아동증언의 보호

박강우 ( Kang Woo Park ) 한국형사정책학회 2005 刑事政策 Vol.17 No.1

무영장ㆍ무동의 채혈의 적법성에 관한 각국 판례의 동향

朴剛旴(Park Kang-Woo) 한국형사법무정책연구원 2005 형사정책연구 Vol.64 No.-

朝鮮朝刑事節次에 있어서 證據裁判主義와 公正한 裁判

박강우(Park Kang-Woo) 한국형사법무정책연구원 2004 형사정책연구 Vol.60 No.-

朝鮮朝大明律直解의 刑法總則的條項의 分析

박강우(Park Kang-Woo) 한국형사법무정책연구원 2003 형사정책연구 Vol.55 No.-

기업범죄의 현황 및 정책분석

박강우(Park Kang-Woo) 한국형사법무정책연구원 1999 형사정책연구원 연구총서 Vol.- No.-

고소제도에 관한 연구

박상기(Park Sang-ki),박강우(Park Kang-woo) 한국형사법무정책연구원 1997 형사정책연구원 연구총서 Vol.- No.-

저작권법상 형사벌칙 조항의 비판적 검토

박강우(Park, Kang Woo) 충북대학교 법학연구소 2010 과학기술과 법 Vol.1 No.2

Under intellectual property law, owners are granted certain exclusive rights to a variety of intangible assets, such as musical, literary, and artistic works; discoveries and inventions; and words, phrases, symbols, and designs. Common types of intellectual property include copyrights, trademarks, patents, industrial design rights and trade secrets in some jurisdictions. Nowadays intellectual property has gaining more and more significance according to social change from industrial society to information society. In Korea legislatures for protection of intellectual property is varied including Copyright Law, Patent Law, Trade Secret Protection Law and etc. This article will review currents of intellectual property related crimes and focus on the features of intellectual property laws on this field. For example, Copyright Law has enhanced the amount of legal punishment for copyright violation and widened the scope of acts under punishment. This trend has been driven from lawmakers' strong intent for protection of intellectual property which has been influenced from business leaders. Other law for intellectual property has taken the similar measures for the infringement acts. I think that this development in this field is biased for the owners of rights and neglect the interest of the public to use the intellectual property freely. Intellectual property should not only protect the interest of the owners but also the public's interest for the intellectual property. There is also criticism because strict intellectual property rights can inhibit the flow of innovations to poor nations. Developing countries have benefitted from the spread of developed country technologies, such as the internet, mobile phone, vaccines, and high-yielding grains.

피학대여성의 남편살해행위에 대한 정당화 및 면책법리의 재검토

박강우(Kang Woo Park),채희정(Hee Jeong Chae) 중앙법학회 2007 中央法學 Vol.9 No.4

대법원 양형기준안과 바람직한 양형개혁의 방향

박강우(Park Kang-Woo) 한국법학원 2009 저스티스 Vol.- No.114

증거에 의하여 사실을 인정하고 인정된 사실에 법률을 적용한 후 이루어지는 양형과정은 피고인이나 일반인에게 유무죄여부보다 오히려 더 큰 관심의 대상이다. 하지만 형사재판에서 적정하고 균등한 형을 도출해내는 작업은 매우 힘든 작업인데 양형과정에서 고려해야 할 양형인자가 너무 많고 다양하기 때문이다. 이러한 양형문제의 해결을 위해 법원은 양형위원회를 설치하여 오랜 논의와 작업 끝에 양형기준안을 발표하여 금년 7월 1일부터 시행하고 있다. 이번 양형기준안은 불합리한 양형편차의 해소를 위하여 매우 필요한 것이고 양형개혁의 소중한 시금석이 될 것이다. 이번 양형기준안은 영미의 수량화모델 가운데에서도 영국식의 개별적ㆍ서술적 모델을 표준으로 작성되었다. 이것은 망라적ㆍ격자형의 미국식 양형기준안이 개별 범죄유형별로 고유하고 특수한 양형인자를 충분히 반영하기 어려울 뿐만 아니라 법관의 양형재량을 배제하여 양형과정을 완전히 수량화ㆍ계량화하는 것이 가능하지도 않고 바람직하지도 않기 때문이다. 이번 양형기준안은 살인죄, 뇌물죄, 성범죄, 강도죄, 횡령ㆍ배임죄, 위증죄, 무고죄 7개 범죄군으로 대상을 한정하였는데 이들 범죄들에 대해서만 양형기준이 마련된 것은 국민적 관심과 발생빈도, 양형인자나 양형요소의 추출용이성 등이 고려된 것이다. 살인범죄에서는 범행동기, 뇌물죄에서는 뇌물액, 성범죄에서는 범행수단과 피해자의 연령 또는 결합되는 범죄의 내용, 강도죄에서는 범행수단과 범죄의 내용 또는 상습성ㆍ전과, 횡령ㆍ배임죄에서는 재산상 이득액, 위증죄에서는 범행의 목적, 무고죄에서는 범행의 내용이 가장 중요한 양형인자로 설정되었다. 이러한 양형기준안에 따라 양형기준의 객관성이 증대되고 양형편차가 어느 정도해소될 수 있을 것이다. 앞으로 양형의 합리화를 더욱 촉진하기 위해서는 양형의 수량화 내지 계량화모델이 갖는 한계를 분명히 인식하고 양형의 규범적ㆍ논증적 구조를 정형화하는 데 노력을 기울여야 한다. 아울러 양형을 법정형→처단형→선고형으로 구분하는 양형이론은 처단형에서 선고형으로 넘어가는 과정이 불명확하다는 점에서 이 부분의 이론개발이 시급하다고 할 것이다. 즉 책임에 기초한 형량결정이 먼저 이루어지고 예방목적을 고려한 형종선택, 형의 유예여부 등이 결정되어야 할 것이다. The criminal trial is a set of processes which decide the fact by evidences, applicate the statute to the fact, and sentence appropriate criminal sanctions. The judge can not neglect any phase of the criminal trial, but the defendants and the public put the most concern on the sentencing output. Sentencing process in criminal trial is very hard and difficult job for judges. The reason lies in too many sentencing facts which can not be simplified and graded, and there has been no systematic estimation process and criterions. Therefore, the practical sentencing work has been criticized by its empirical and statistical character rather than systematic and analytic. To assist sentencing decision in criminal trial Supreme Court presented sentencing guideline which is being into practice from July 2009 after long discussion and research. This sentencing guideline can be evaluated the milestone for the reform of criminal trial, but there is much to be done at this guidelines. The sentencing guidelines set the model after English Sentencing Guidelines which are characterized by its individual and partial model, so they are different from American Sentencing Guidelines which have covering all crimes. The Sentencing Guidelines of Supreme Court are seeking to make sentences predictable, to limit undesirable sentencing disparity and to make sentencing transparent. Also the guidelines seek to give citizens an honest, front-end account of sentences actually to be served. For this purpose the current sentencing guidelines are too brief to use for complicated sentencing cases. The quantitative sentencing model of England or the United States Guidelines have a basic limit which can not formalize the normative and argumentative structure of sentencing work. But the guidelines have made an important improvement by posing the reference circumstances and the assessing principle to decide suspension of the sentence. In the future, the cooperative efforts between the judiciaries and the academics should be kept on to develop the more systematic and perfect sentencing guidelines.

인간배아연구의 법적 규제

박강우(Park, Kang Woo) 충북대학교 법학연구소 2010 과학기술과 법 Vol.1 No.1

Human embryonic stem cells (hESC) are able to maintain pluripotency in culture, to proliferate indefinitely and to differentiate into all somatic cell types. Due to these unique properties, hESC may become an exceptional source of tissues for transplantation and have a great potential for the therapy of incurable diseases. This essay reviews the legal problems of human embryonic stem cell research. Firstly, the definition of embryonic stem cell and the risk of embryonic stem cell research are discussed. Secondly, the legal problems of human embryonic stem cell research are discussed. Thirdly, the specific problems of current 'law on bio-ethic and security' (2005) in Korea are discussed. Lastly, the vary measures and laws are available to prevent and minimize dangerousness in bio-technology area and the problems of desirable and efficient method has been addressed. The legal control on human embryonic stem sell is necessary to protect human dignity. But, many pro-research scientists stand against it. They asserts that hESC research will be helpful to cure human disease that have so far defied cures, such as type 1 diabetes, the Alzheimer's disease, the Parkison's disease. But, pro-life group asserts that the human embryo should be protected equally as human beings. Therefore, they insists that all sorts of experiments connected with human embryo should be prohibited. In this paper I propose compromise solution. Human embryonic stem sell reasrch should be allowed to help patients with incurable diseases. But human cloning research can be dangerous to human dignity and should be under control by government and public agencies. Also, diverse measures and laws should be employed to regulate human embryonic stem cell research. The best choice is the self-control of human biotechnology scientists. But also other methods should be combined with above self-control by scientists.