서울마케팅 전략개발에 관한 연구

김찬동(Chan-Dong Kim),오현(Hyun Oh) 서울연구원 2006 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

정치행정관계와 행정책임문화

김찬동(Chan Dong Kim) 서울행정학회 2005 한국사회와 행정연구 Vol.16 No.2

The system of national policy pursuits the efficiency and responsibility through political and administrative specialization of functuion. The content and direction of national policy might depend on the relation of politics and administration. The vertical ralation of command-obedience on the chain of command have changed into the horizental relation of guidance-addistance as on-going Administrative State and Wellfare State. The role of administrator is also viewed as vision-mension and policy-mens ion beyond administration-mension and management-mension. Therefore. in this context. it is thought that responsibility of administrator has to have political responsibility. But the representative democratic system gives exemption of responsibility to administrator differently politician. Politicians take over all responsibility including administrator's political responsibility. The problem of responsibility is various according to administrative culture. In the case of Korea. our nation, prime minister and secretary have charged the responsibility of policy failure instead of President. But. in Japan's case. administrator developed various logics about accountability not to burden the political responsibility to politician. The policy of the opening rice market is the representative case to discuss about the issue mentioned here.

주민자치회 모델의 다양화 방안 : 행정복지센터 기능분석을 중심으로

김찬동(Chan Dong Kim) 건국대학교 시민정치연구소 2021 시민정치연구 Vol.3 No.-

계약사무 이관에 따른 전문성 강화방안 연구

김찬동(Chan-Dong Kim),배준식(Jun-Sik Bae),박성문(Seong-Moon Park) 서울연구원 2010 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

아파트 관리의 공공성 제고방안

김찬동(Chan-Dong Kim),박은철(Eun-Cheol Park),김정욱(Jung Wook Kim) 서울연구원 2010 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

대도시권 정부 간 거버넌스 연구

김찬동(Chan-Dong Kim),이세구(Se-Koo Rhee),이주헌(Joo-Hun Lee),박성문(Seong-Moon Park) 서울연구원 2009 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

특별사법경찰제도의 장기발전방안

김찬동 ( Chan Dong Kim ),이세구 ( Se Koo Rhee ),박성문 ( Seong Moon Park ) 서울시정개발연구원 2009 연구보고서 Vol.2009 No.51

The purposes of this study are to analyse the current conditions and to figure out the problems of Special Judicial Police (SJP) system of Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG), and to suggest the ideas to develop the future SJP. The SJP system in Korea has different historical background compared to foreign countries` SJPs. The SMG adopted the SJP system in 2008 in order to promote the civil safety in several areas as a citizen-centered administration. SMG plays the role to provide the necessary budgets to form the Division of Special Judicial Police while city`s 25 Autonomous Districts to dispatch the personnels to work with. The coverage of SJP includes food, juvenile delinquency, environmental pollution and hygiene. SJP has shown considerable performance so far through the investigation of such areas. However, there have been several difficulties for SJP to face with. First of all, the SJP officers who used to deal with the paperworks inside offices experience the difficulty of executing criminal investigation. There have been insufficient budget and instruments for criminal investigation. Moreover, the Division has experienced the difficulties in personnel and organization management together with the lack of expertise in criminal investigation for the officers. Whereas three to five year experience of investigation would lead the officers to become expertise in general, they have experienced the circulation personnel management system which usually results to less than three year work with the division. The rate of citizens` recognition of SJP is very low as 17%. But, so long as they recognize the SJP in SMG, their satisfaction for SJP is quite high as 57%. Also, they have felt the necessity of SJP strongly as 65%. The exact expression of SJP in SMG would be the comprehensive SJP which means any officers are in charge of whole areas of SJP while current officer has dealt with any specific area of SJP. Although SJP has already been existed in autonomous districts before SMG organized the division in the city, mayors of autonomous districts who are elected through public elections have a tendency not to utilize the SJP system because of popularity. However, mayor of SMG has a responsibility for public safety in Seoul metropolitan area. Thus the SJP division has been organized as a part of a city government to deal with the problems arised. The administrative problems of comprehensive SJP are as follows. First, while the officers are assigned to the division of SMG, they are evaluated for the promotion and other personnel management in their original organizations, that is autonomous districts. Second, there are insufficient budgets for the investigation and following activities. Third, there are lack of the systematical education and training to reinforce the officers to become investigation expert. Therefore, there need to apply the unified personnel management system for the SJP officers between city and autonomous districts, to increase budget to support SJP activities, and to provide the necessary education and training. Also, the future steering of SJP would be important to the development of future local autonomy system. This study suggests several short-term strategies to develop SJP on the basis of current structure. But the mid-term strategies as autonomous districts` proper role are also proposed since the SJP service should be provided by the lower-level government, that is autonomous districts. The long-term development strategies are also proposed on the basis of introduction of autonomous police system in local government level. The SJP needs to cultivate investigation capability. The city government and autonomous district governments might have their own SJP organizations, and coordinate SJP activities.

근린생활 행정자치제도의 개혁방향

김찬동(Chan Dong Kim) 서울연구원 2014 서울도시연구 Vol.15 No.4

마을공동체 복원을 통한 주민자치 실현방안

김찬동(Chan-Dong Kim),서윤정(Yun-Jung Seo) 서울연구원 2012 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 Vol.- No.-

This study aims to show the significance of neighborhood community rebuilding movement, which is represented by neighborhood community movement, and to suggest tasks and prerequisites for the success of the citizen autonomy. Rebuilding community, in the process of discussion among local residents with a sense of solidarity and reciprocity, can improve the grass-root democracy and recover the true function of citizen autonomy. Community is a group of members who collaborate with reciprocity based on shared understanding and norms. Autonomy is a part of self-governance, and addresses common issues together through organizations and institution. Participation is a critical factor on both community and autonomy. This study is planned based on the literature review and the results of advisory meeting, and suggests theoretical background of neighborhood community and citizen autonomy, and finally, analyzes several practical cases of neighborhood communities by 4 development stages. The development stage of community can be divided as followsㆍThe first stage is the facilitating participation, the second stage is the preserving community identity, the third stage is the semi-citizen autonomy (interaction and investment), and finally, the fourth stage is semi-group autonomy (including the representative function). Since the function of neighborhood community may depend on the level of participation, facilitating citizen participation can be a solution for rebuilding neighborhood community. The external support using tacit knowledge cumulated by civic organizations is an important factor as well. Civic organizations should have an intermediary role in that supporting process by monitoring resident’s demands continuously and developing their ability. Professionals are needed for arranging and systemizing resident’s demands using technical terms and sentences. Furthermore, the good public participatory community building will be realized by that professionals educate residents and assist them to be a field professional. Public administration should provide plenty of chances for residents to meet together, and support those meetings. That is, administrative officers and staff should not appear in the limelight, but should establish the foundation of easy public participation. The public-private partnership is the most important factor in community building project.

한국미술에 있어 대안적 전시기획의 과제

김찬동(Kim Chan dong) 한국예술경영학회 2001 예술경영연구 Vol.1 No.-

Since the opening, in recent years, of new exhibition spaces in Korea, there has been a lively debate surrounding alternative exhibitions. The debate’s background is the Korean art world’s desire for change both in its artistic tendencies and its context. The alternative exhibition comes from the alternative space in America, home, at the end of the nineteen-seventies, of the industrial society, of rapidly changing cultural conditions, and of the avant-garde art movement. Here, “alternative space” meant small nonprofit artists cooperatives open to the kind of artistic experimentation that found no place in mainstream commercial galleries and museums. In Korea, the alternative space is a rogue offshoot of American and Western European alternative spaces of the seventies. The Korean version seeks to inspire discussion on alternative art and to free itself from the art system and existing art paradigms. It shows art that is impossible to sell, is intimately linked to daily life and popular culture, destroys the traditional exhibition space, can make do when it is geographically removed from the conventional cultural center of the city, and is comfortable in the open air. The Korean alternative exhibition is also sometimes organized with haste, carelessness, and little regard for a coherent concept that would do justice to its status as alternative art, all because the concept’s historical background is completely opposed to the concept of the alternative exhibition in America and Western Europe. The historical avant-garde, which appeared at the beginning of the twentieth century, became the system, while at first professing to be an alternative art. Yet its alternative aspect failed to establish itself in the midst of a rapidly evolving capitalism. Today, it is evident that this state remains, and that the alternative exhibition cannot free itself from this process. Recent examples of the alternative exhibition underline the uncertainty of a situation in which there is no clear foundation such as the modernist system’s espousal of the historical avant-garde as the alternative art. Alternative art is already anchored in the system, so it is difficult to expose its character. Of course, in the case of a Korean alternative art, comparisons with the West are risky. More than anything else, a Korean alternative art should cast its net wide enough to incorporate method, process, and content, and to go beyond the contradictions and systematic habits that are rooted in the conventional art world. This problem can be solved by looking hard at the weight of history in modern art and defining its object. Until now, Korean art has judged itself according to the rules of Western art theory. This essential structural contradiction can only be overcome by an alternative thinking. True alternative theory, which is the fruit of an alternative thinking process, takes as its ultimate goal the organization of a system of significations that is unique to our art. When this is understood, an alternative Korean art and an alternative Korean exhibition, which are now hot subjects in the Korean art world, will undoubtedly have the right to be seen as the latest fashionable Western concepts.