http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Adjunct Control and Complementation
권기양,이원빈 새한영어영문학회 2011 새한영어영문학 Vol.53 No.4
This paper considers two types of previous analyses of adjunct control and their problems and we address the way adjunct control constructions are derived via late merger and complementation mechanism. To obtain the control properties in adjunct control, we have suggested three steps: 1) the adjunct clause of adjunct control structures is merged into the matrix clause postcyclically, 2) the late-merged adjunct undergoes the process of complementation of matrix clause for the correct interpretation between the adjunct clause and the matrix clause, and 3) the copy in the adjunct clause is always deleted, capturing the control property in adjunct clause.
권기양,이원빈 새한영어영문학회 2015 새한영어영문학 Vol.57 No.1
This paper explores the properties of sentential subject CPs. The status of sentential subject CPs has been controversial in the literature. We assume that sentential subject CPs have a dual status: topics or real subjects. To derive such dual property of sentential subject CPs, we adopt Chomsky’s parallel movement approach. When the sentential subject CP functions as topics, the CP moves both to the subject and topic positions simultaneously. However, the CP has a role of a real subject, it just moves to the subject position of TP to check φ-feature of T.
권기양 새한영어영문학회 2014 새한영어영문학 Vol.56 No.3
In this paper, we consider properties of two types of labeling: labeling through movement in Chomsky (2013) and labeling through Transfer in Narita (2011) and Takita (2014). Pointing out the flaws of two types of labeling, we will suggest the interactive approach between two types of labeling as follows: First, following Chomsky (2013), Narita (2011), and Takita (2014), we assume that there can be no merger of two phrasal SOs, that is *{XP, YP}. Second, we assume a strict spell-out by each labeling operation, not a cyclic spell-out by phase in Chomsky (2000). Finally, following Narita (2011) and Takita (2014), labeling renders elements within the interior of the labeled phrase inaccessible to further syntactic operations. Given these proposals, we will propose the novel approach of the motivation of the possessor-raising in an Inalienable Possessor Constructions (IPC) and the illegal object scrambling in IPC in Korean.
[기획논문] 중국어권 KFL 학습자들을 위한 효과적인 발음교육 방안
권기양 부산대학교 인문학연구소 2007 코기토 Vol.- No.61
In the past ten years or so, Korean has been taught in a number of Chinese universities, and the number of Chinese students who want to study Korean as a foreign as second language (KFL / KSL) has been increased. Although Chinese KFL learners tend to comprehend vocabulary in Korean quickly due to Chinese characters in Korean, they tend to incorrectly pronounce some types of Korean consonants and vowels. This is because they cannot differentiate the right phonetic quality of Korean consonants and vowels. It is important for them to instruct the phonetic differences between Korean and Chinese. In order to suggest proficient Korean pronunciation teaching methods for Chinese KFL learners, we also consider errors produced by Chinese KFL learners and their cause. Errors produced by Chinese KFL learners can be identified and explained by linguistic interference of the mother tongue over the learning target language, that is, Korean. Korean pronunciations seem to Chinese students to be difficult because of many unfamiliar consonant and vowel sounds that they meet for the first time. Hoping to assimilate Korean pronunciation system, Chinese KFL learners tend to refer unconsciously to the phonologic knowledge of their mother tongue. The most frequently pronunciation errors are observed with the contrast between the fortis and aspirated sounds, and with phonological rules such as liaison, etc. As for proficient Korean pronunciation teaching methods for Chinese KFL learners, we suggest four teaching methods: (1) teaching methods of stop, fricative, and affricative sounds, (2) teaching methods of /ㅅ, ㅆ/, (3) teaching methods of flap sound /ɾ/ using Korean children’s song, and (4) teaching methods of fortis and aspiration with syllabic distance and tone.
권기양 현대문법학회 2003 현대문법연구 Vol.32 No.-
Kiyang Kwon. 2003. `That-t` Effects and the C-T Relation. Studies in Modern Grammar 32, 89-110. In this paper, we will consider the account of subject extraction out of `that`-clauses based on the split C strategy (Szczegielniak 1999) and the C-T Agree relation (Pesetsky and Torrego 2001) and point our their problems. According to Pesetsky and Torrego (2001), the C-T Agree relation is morphologically expressed in two ways: by merging `that` or merging the feature content of T (along with Agr) in C. However, we have assumed that if `do` in English is associated with a question, it is not independently attested as the realization of T but the realization of Q in c, serving as the interrogative morpheme. To obtain this argument, we have proposed the Q-feature of C as a property to determine the type of a clause. The Q-feature of C plays a role of distinguishing an interrogative C from a declarative C and can serve as a probe to seek the element with the interrogative morpheme, such as `-ni` in Korean.