行政의 政策指向性과 公益(下) : From the Standpoint of the Nomative Universality of Public Interest 公益의 規範的 普遍性을 中心으로

曺善一 건국대학교 1983 論文集 Vol.16 No.1

CONTENTS ; Ⅰ.Introduction Ⅱ.Modern Public Administration and Public Interest 1) Increasing Concerns for the Concept 2) History of Administrative Theories and Public Interest Ⅲ.The Diversity of the Concept of Public Interest 1) Main Issues of the Concept 2) The Conceptual Muddle 3) Utility and Indispensability of the Concept Ⅳ.Wide Ranges of Views concerning the Explication and Some Classification of the Concept by the Debaters/Proponents 1) Leys arid Perry's Conceptual Framework 2) Schubert's Three Categories 3) Banfield's Two Categories 4) Sorauf's Five Categories 5) Frankle's four Categories 6) Cassinelli's Comment 7) Griffith's Some Brief Summary 8) Lasswell's One Set of Definition 9) Musgrave's Analysis 10) Down's Explaination 11) Held's Three Categories Ⅴ.Historical Evolution for Investigation of the Real Contents of the Public Interest Ⅵ.The Meaning of Pubric Interest Basis on the Metapolicy Aspect 1) Justice-fairness of the Social Arrangement for realizing Human Diginity and Values 2) Measurement and Improvement of the General Quality of Life 3) Dominant Values under the Trend of the Times and Social Situation Ⅶ. Various Methodes of Policy Study according to Mental Attitudes on the Public Interest 1) Some Major Practical Disclosing Methodes of Public Interest 2) Policy Analysis Tectniques as regards Some Mental Attitudes Heavy Stress ; 1.The concept of public interest is an elusive imperative. It has no a prior content waiting to be revealed because of it's attributes which are characterized as having value-laden, ambiguous and abstract explications. The public interest is thus in nature and most be searched for in various ways. 2.The terms can he guided as appropriate means for getting general approval of peoples in policy formulation for politicans and administrators together with goals in itself. At the same time, it should be functioned as a guiding belief or moral commender. Still more, it also provides sore criterions in policy analsis and it's evlauation. As student of public administration and policy analysts, we cannot afford to ignore the concept, especially in the evaluation of policy content and impact. 3.The real content of public interest exists as various tapes because it has it's particularity in the specific historical times and spaces. It is, however, impotent that we should understand it in connection with the universality which can be found through the times and the trend of social situations. In the point of the aboves, the writer analized various issues of public interest theories and examined its historical evolution and then, attempted to stipulated the implications of terms and some patterns of policy study in relation to public policy basis on the Metapolicy. 4.If implications of public interest probably cannot be converted into a precise set of guidelines to inform the action of decision-maters, neither can it fairy be described as merely a myth. What is needed for the public administration is a simple and operational articulation of the public interests that permits him to make a moral choice on the basis of rational thinking. In the connection with the aboves, great two main elements of public interest, human dignity and values and general quality of life, which can be derived from historical evolution for inquiring public interest, schould he regarded as the normative universality of it basis on the Metapolicy. So, the writer analized concrete specifications of two normative universality elements according to both John Rawl's principles of justice and Social Indicators. 5.Rawls extends the notion of a social contract formulated by John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes, arid contends implicing two "principles of justice" : (1) equal right to basic liberities, and (2) the difference principle coupled with equal opportunity. These two principles basically define for Rawls the just society. Meanwhile, social indicators refers to quantative descriptions and analyses of societal conditions and trends. It can aid in assessing the effectiveness of policies, provide insights into the state of the nation and may ultimately make possible a better evaluation of what public programs are accomplishing. 6.Public interest is still inadequate as a general concept to evaluate public policy. The inadequacy of the public interest criteria holds for five main versions : numerical, structural, mess, adjustment and ethical public interest. A numerical public interest may be contrary to an individual's interest when the preponderance of interest is against him : he is in a numerical minority. A structural public interest may work aganst an individual's interests by placing a social practice or institution against him : to maintain come structures may require a sacrifice of some individuals. A mass public interest is, on the other hand, consistent with the interest of each and every individual in the society : securing primary goods is in the interest is of each and every member of the human race. Adjustment public interest is achieved through the process of group conflict, compromise, and resolution of issues. And finally ethical public interest is that view which holds that it is an ethical criterion of policy that cannot he deduced from the wishes, demands, or aspirations of the people generally hut can only be properly divined by a few qualified people. According to the above procedual viewing of concept, the study methodes of the public interest and policy analysis techniques should he taken different place one another.

공무원직장협의회제도 운영에 관한 실증적 연구

조선일 한국행정학회 2001 韓國行政學報 Vol.35 No.4

본 연구에서는 공무원직장협의회제도를 둘러싼 환경적 변화와 운영상의 문제점들에 주목하여, 직장협의회의 제도적 측면과 운영적 측면에서의 현황과 문제점들을 설립, 가입범위, 협의회 기능, 기관장의 의무, 협의회의 구성 및 운영을 중심으로 관련법의 검토와 공무원들에 대한 실증적인 인식조사를 바탕으로 평가한 후, 향후의 발전방향과 정책적 시사점을 제시하고자 한다. 발전방향으로는 무엇보다도 먼저 공무원노조와의 관계설정 필요성을 지적하고, 적극적 참여 유발 장치로서는 공무원들의 인식전환 및 적극적 참여, 단체장을 포함한 상급자의 의식의 전환은 물론, 설치주의로의 전환, 입법적 미비의 해소, 가입제한의 완화 등을 제시한다. 아울러 협의내용 및 협의횟수의 확대, 협의결과의 이행 강제, 협의회활동 규제의 완화 등을 제시한다. 특히 무엇보다도 공무원단체활동에 대한 국민들의 인식의 제고가 중요한 만큼 직장협의회는 내부혁신 및 내부고발 등을 통한 부정부패방지와 행정능률의 향상을 도모할 뿐만 아니라 대민봉사활동 및 공직윤리확립 등에 노력하여 일반 국민들의 공무원단체활동에 대한 부정적인 인식을 탈색시킬 필요가 있음을 지적한다.

지방공무원 직장협의회 공무원직장협의회 제도 운영의 평가와 발전방향

조선일 대한지방행정공제회 2001 地方行政 Vol.50 No.574

N/A

적극적 인사행정 관점에서의 적극행정 운영분석과 정책적 함의

조선일 한국거버넌스학회 2023 한국거버넌스학회보 Vol.30 No.1

Positive public personnel administration can give many implications to the practical aspects of active public administration in that it emphasizes responding to normatively presented tasks in an active, preemptive, and flexible manner. In this regard, it is meaningful to explore the characteristics of current active public administration tasks such as agenda discovery, policy target group, method, pursued value, executive system, executive participants, executive unit, executive process, institutional status, and to explore policy implications in the field of public personnel administration do. As a result of the analysis, in order to expand positive public personnel administration in the future, the preparation of an appropriate support system for the execution of active public administrative tasks in the public personnel administration field, a systematic and comprehensive approach such as approach by sector and function, the performance of the government-wide consultative body function of the Active Public Administration Committee of the Ministry of Personnel Management rre needed. 적극 행정은 우리나라에서는 비교적 근래에 활발하게 논의되는 제도이나 원래 인사행정 분야에서는 적극적 인사행정이라는 내용으로 일찍부터 논의되었고, 현대의 인사행정은 기본적으로 적극적 인사행정에 기반을 두고 있다고 할 수 있다. 적극적 인사행정은 현안 문제의 적극적 발굴과 해결 노력의 지속적 전개라는 실천적 측면에서 보면 적극행정과 유사한 측면이 매우 많으므로, 규범적으로 제시된 과제에 대해 능동적, 선제적, 신축적으로 대응하는 것을 강조한다는 점에서 적극행정의 실천적 측면에 많은 시사점을 줄 수 있다고 판단된다. 이러한 측면에서 현재의 적극행정의 과제발굴, 추진대상, 방법, 추구하는 가치, 추진체계, 추진주체, 추진단위, 추진과정, 제도적 위상 등의 특징을 살펴보고 인사행정분야 적극행정의 주요 특징을 분석하고 향후 인사행정분야 적극행정의 확대를 위한 정책적 시사점을 제시하였다.

중앙정부 경영진단 과정에 관한 비판적 고찰

조선일 한국행정학회 1999 韓國行政學報 Vol.33 No.1

김대중 정부는 제1차 정부조직 개편의 미비점을 보완하고 효율적인 행정체제구축을 위해 4개월여에 걸친 중앙정부 `경영진단`을 실시한 후 제2차 정부조직개편안을 발표하였다. 본 연구는 그러한 조직개편을 위해 처음으로 실시된 경영진단과정상의 특징과 문제점을 탐색하였다. 먼저 중앙정부 경영진단 작업은 선례가 없는 muddling through과정이었으며 정부주도도 민간주도도 아닌 `정부주도의 민간 경영진단`이라는 특이한 성격을 띄고 있다. 아울러 그동안의 개혁작업과는 다르게 기능분석접근과 운영시스템 개혁을 포함하는 내용을 담고 있으며, 이념적으로는 효율성을 지향하고 있다는 점을 특징으로 하고 있다. 이러한 특징을 지닌 정부운영과 정부조직 개편을 위한 경영진단작업은 시간적 한계와 불명확한 일정, 진단기관의 전문성과 종합적 시각의 결여, 기능분석의 한계와 목표의 일관성 결여, 부처이기주의와 관료정치의 모습, 개혁의 한계성등의 문제점을 보여주고 있어서 향후 정부조직개편에 중요한 시사점을 제시해 주고 있다.

[특집 : 2013년 5급 공채(행시) 제2차시험 출제경향 분석과 강평 및 모범답안] 행정학(일반행정직렬)

조선일 고시계사 2013 考試界 Vol.58 No.9

광양 경제특구 개발을 위한 효율적 행정체제 구축방안

조선일 순천대학교 남도문화연구소 2003 南道文化硏究 Vol.9 No.-

인구소멸시대 균형인사 정책방향-지역인재 채용제도를 중심으로-

조선일 한국거버넌스학회 2018 한국거버넌스학회 학술대회자료집 Vol.2018 No.2

行政의 政策指向性과 公益(上)

曺善一 건국대학교 1982 論文集 Vol.15 No.1

The concept of the public interest plays a central role in discussion of public policy, political action, social values and individiual interest. It is often treated as an ideal standard to which appeals for validation of political claims and as the highest good for all members in given society. Thus the public interest is akin to the statements of ultimate ends that characteri3e political philosophy. The public interest has no a prior content waiting to be revealed because of its attributes which are characterized as having value-laden, ambiguous, and abstract explications. forever, The conception is elastic and relative rather than fixed and absolute. Public responsibilities regarded as being in the public interest in one setting may, therefore, not be so regarded in a different context. However, these facts ironically makes it of greater utility in the guest for a supporting consensus as social changes occur and effort at accommondation are made. The concept of the public interest has more important maening in connection with the policy-making system than other mutters wherein it is viewed as the objective of the dull authorized organs of government. The policy-making system is composed of very complicated and dynamic process for achivement of public interest. The terms can be guided as appropriate means for getting general approval of peoples in policy formulation for politicans and adminstrators together with goals in itself. At the same time, it should he functioned as guiding belief or moral commender. Still more it also provides some criterions in policy analysis and its evlauation. For these reasons, it has been evident that one of the Host impotant issuers in modern public adminstration is to how male rationalize policy-making system in order that the public policy by administrators enable to be coincide with public policy which is total system of administrative goals/objectives. In this point of the above views, the present paper reviews various issues of public interest theories and examinded its historical evolution and then, attempted to stipulated the implications of terms and some patterns of policy study in relation to public policy basic Meta-policy.

반부패 정책의 실효성 확보에 관한 연구 -국방 분야를 중심으로-

조선일,배정아 한국거버넌스학회 2006 한국거버넌스학회보 Vol.13 No.1

This article analyzes the problems of anti-corruption policy in the field of national defense, and intends to suggest some implications to solve them. First of all, there is an obscurity about what is the definition of corruption-for example, whether the general soldiers are included to the range of military officials and whether the evasion of military service is a corruption or not. Second, continuing and recycling corruption implicates present anti-corruption policy should be improved. Thus, approaching to solve these problems, we need to clarify what is the corruption and why it is occurred in the field of national defense. In this context, this article classifies the types of corruption in the field of national defense into six orders and then evaluates respectively the problems of anti-corruption policy relating to the case of continuing and recycling corruption. The results of analysis suggest some needed devices for the improvement of the anti-corruption policy in the field of national defense as follows: enhancing anti-corruption education for the public officials, intensifying protection for the whistleblowers, appropriate punishing for the corrupt officials, revitalizing participation of civil or non-governmental organization, increasing information disclosure. 본 논문에서는 국방 분야의 반부패 정책의 실효성을 확보하기 위해서 부패취약업무별로 유형화하여 관련 정책의 운영과 제도적 기반의 실태와 문제점을 분석한다. 특히 국방 분야의 관행화된 부패를 유형화하여 각 부문별 사례분석을 통해 부문별 반부패정책이 그러한 부패를 극복할 수 있는지의 여부와 그렇지 않다면 무엇이 문제점인가를 분석한다. 분석결과, 업무 부문별 반부패 정책의 제도와 운영은 부패사례와 연관되어 구체성은 있으나 제도의 확립이나 행정절차적인 개선에서는 각 부문별로 차이를 보이고 있었으며, 부문별 관행화된 부패사례는 공무원과 민원인의 근본적인 인식 변화와 노력 없이는 제도나 절차의 개선이 사실상 무의미해짐을 보여주고 있다. 또한 반부패 정책의 제도적 기반으로서의 교육, 내부공익제도, 정보공개를 통한 민원인의 참여, 감사・감찰제도 등의 확립이 무엇보다도 중요하지만, 실제 운영에 있어서 국가청렴위원회가 제시한 공통시책을 그대로 답습하거나 부패취약업무에 대한 체계적인 진단 없이 정책을 수립하여 적실성이 떨어지거나 소극적인 운영으로 인하여 부패극복에 별 도움이 되지 못하고 있다. 따라서 국방 분야의 반부패 정책의 제도와 운영에서 실효성을 확보하기 위해서는 부문별 제도의 확립이나 절차상의 개선 노력과 더불어 반부패교육, 민・관 협력, 정보공개 등의 제도적 기반을 이 분야의 특수성에 맞게 구축해 나갈 필요성이 있는 것으로 분석되었다.