http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김래현,안재순 서울産業大學校 1993 논문집 Vol.38 No.1
본 연구는 솔벤트의 용해성이 우수하고 조색 및 취급이 용이하며, 유류의 착색에 사용할 수 있는 liquid blue의 액상형염료를 합성하였다. 합성된 최종합성물질이 원하는 염료가 합성되었는지. 바라는 색상이 나타나는가는 UV, FT-IR 을 통하여 검증하였다. 또한 제조공정에 매우 중요한 특성인 여과성, 수율에 대하여 산도(pH), 반응온도등이 어떻게 영향을 미치는지를 실험하고 최적의 조건을 찾고자 하였다. 파란색 액체염료(liquid blue)의 경우 반응온도는 100℃,반응시간은 6시간, pH는 12.1일때 가장 안정한 상태를 보였다. 물 분리시 최종 pH는 8.0로 나타났다. 여과시 여과성에 영향을 미치는 요인은 산화제의 양, 가성소다의 양, 물분리시 수세횟수 및 pH, 여과온도였다. 특히 여과성에 가장 크게 영향을 미치는 주요인은 여과온도로 나타났다. 여과시 잔사를 TLC(thin layer chromatography)로 분석결과 미반응물질은 quinizarin 이었다. UV 분석결과 색상은 blue-green임을 확인 할 수 있었다. The liquid blue dyestuffs which have good solubility in petroleum and are able to make color easily were synthesized. The color and the characteristics of synthesized dyes were identified by UV and FT-IR. The effects of acidity (pH) and reaction temperature about filtering time and yields were examined and the optimum condition was investigated experimentally. The optimum conditions were appeared that the reaction temperature was 100℃, the reaction time was 6 hours, and the pH was 12.1. The factors in filtering process were the quantity of oxidant and sodium hydroxide, the rinsing times, pH and temperature. Particularly, the filtration efficiency was significantly dominated by the temperature. The unreacted residue was quinizarin by TLC(Thin Layer Chromatography) analysis. The color of final product was identified as a blue-green by UV analysis.
안재순 성균관대학교 유교문화연구소 2007 儒敎文化硏究(中文版) Vol.7 No.-
The Korean Neo-Confucianism in 17C was deepened by both Toegye`s and Yoolgog`s schools, and anther school, which compromised the theories between two schools, appeared. They tried to explain the mind and nature of Man with li-qi theory. In this process they were concerned about the relation between Man`s and Thing`s nature, that is “Is it the same or different mutually? On the other side, Zhuxi`s commentation of the Confucian scriptures was absolutely reverenced, so the different commentation about Zhuxi`s could never be approved. In such an atmosphere, Baegho and Seogye unfolded anti-Zhuxi`s commentation. This current of Korean confucianism in 17C has a meaning as below. First, it became a background of the Practical Learning in the latter Chosun dynasty. Especially it concerned with an Eclectic School of Korean Neo-Confucianism in 17C. Second, the survey of Man`s and Thing`s nature in this period made a way for Ho-Rag Debate, which was the most important theme in 18C`s Korean Neo-Confucianism. Third, anti-Zhuxi`s commentation of the Confucian scriptures took Yangming school out of a shady spot.