http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Yoon, Taeyoung 연세대학교 동서문제연구원 2003 Global economic review Vol.32 No.2
For more than four decades, U.S. engagement in the Asia-Pacific was centered on two premises: a Cold War commitment to Asian security and the remarkable economic power of the U.S. The U.S. Navy provided a symbol of the United States' commitment to protect its interests and those of its major Asian-pacific allies. Despite the end of the Cold War, the security environment of the Asia-Pacific region is still less changed and even a new threat of a regional naval arms race emerged in the 1990s. In this context, although forward deployments of U.S. military power in the Western Pacific have been scaled down, it is certain that the U.S. naval force will continue to play an important role as a key "regional balancer." Amid the collapse of the Soviet Union and in the post-Cold War era, the U.S. has still emphasized the maintenance of a U.S. forward-deployed presence and strong defense alliances with U.S. allies in order to prevent the emergence of regional hegemonic powers and to contribute to regional stability as well as improve U.S. economic interests. Moreover, in the face of a multitude of threats from state and non-state actors, the U.S. Navy is increasingly focused on and driven by the demands of peacetime and crisis forward presence.
Taeyoung Yoon 연세대학교 동서문제연구원 2003 Global economic review Vol.32 No.2
For more than four decades U.S. engagement in the Asia-Pacific was centered on two premises: a Cold War commitment to Asian security and the remarkable economic power of the U.S. The U.S. Navy provided a symbol of the United States’ commitment to protect its interests and those of its major Asian-pacific allies. Despite the end of the Cold War, the security environment of the Asia-Pacific region is still less changed and even a new threat of a regional naval arms race emerged in the 1990s. In this context, although forward deployments of U.S. military power in the Western Pacific have been scaled down, it is certain that the U.S. naval force will continue to play an important role as a key “regional balancer.” Amid the collapse of the Soviet Union and in the post-Cold War era, the U.S. has still emphasized the maintenance of a U.S. forward-deployed presence and strong defense alliances with U.S. allies in order to prevent the emergence of regional hegemonic powers and to contribute to regional stability as well as improve U.S. economic interests. Moreover, in the face of a multitude of threats from state and non-state actors, the U.S. Navy is increasingly focused on and driven by the demands of peacetime and crisis forward presence.
TERRORISM AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT : THE RANGOON BOMBING INCIDENT OF 1983
Yoon, Taeyoung 연세대학교 동서문제연구원 2001 Global economic review Vol.30 No.4
The Rangoon bombing incident represents one of the major crisis events for examination if one is to understand the process of crisis management of Chun Doo Hwan's government within the context of the ROK-U.S. Combined Forces Command. Moreover, the Rangoon bombing was the first grave terrorist act on the international scene, and North Korea's involvement was not immediately revealed. This case clearly illustrated how South Korea's resolve in restraining punitive military action against North Korea could resolve a crisis without escalating it, and facilitate a favourable outcome. Indeed, in order to protect or to minimize the damage to its interests and without triggering an unwanted escalation of crisis, South Korea made vigorous efforts to pressure North Korea into softening its belligerent stance through the use of diplomatic sanctions.
윤태영(Taeyoung Yoon) 한국국회학회 2024 한국과 세계 Vol.6 No.1
Noncombatant evacuation operations are activities conducted by mobilizing diplomatic, defense, and intelligence capabilities to protect overseas nationals in dangerous areas and to ensure their safe return to home countries. Based on the analysis of NEO cases in the U.S, and Korea, the factors and implications for successful NEOs are as follows. First, the key elements of NEO planning are situational awareness and preparedness for the changing environment. Second, it is necessary to identify the approach routes and attack types of hostile forces based on the principles of evacuation operations(accuracy, security, and speed). Third, effective cooperation and coordination among the DOS/Foreign Affairs, DOD, Diplomatic Missions, and NEO forces should be ensured during NEO implementation. Fourth, DOD and intelligence agencies should provide the local mission with intelligence on theater of operations assessments and identification of hostile forces. Fifth, since NEO in conflict areas operate in remote overseas areas, close military cooperation and joint operations with allies are also essential. 해외 위험지역에서 다양한 위난상황으로부터 재외국민을 보호하고 본국으로 안전한 귀환을 위해 외교·국방·정보 역량을 동원하여 수행되는 활동이 비전투원후송작전(NEO)이다. 미국과 한국이 수행했던 NEO 사례분석을 바탕으로 도출된 NEO의 성공적인 수행을 위한 요인과 시사점은 다음과 같다. 첫째, NEO 계획의 핵심요소는 변화하는 작전환경에 대한 상황인식과 대비태세이다. 둘째, 후송작전의 기본원칙인 정확성, 보안, 속도를 기반으로 하여 적대세력의 접근경로와 공격유형을 파악하고, 급변하는 위협환경에 대응할 수 있는 신속대응군과 후송부대를 투입해야한다. 셋째, NEO 계획, 경보발령, 집결·재배치, 후송·귀환 과정에서 국무부/외교부, 국방부, 재외공관, NEO 수행부대 간의 효과적인 협력과 조정업무가 이루어져야한다. 넷째, 국방부와 정보기관은 현지 임무수행단에게 작전지역 평가, 위협평가, 적대세력의 위협방책 식별, 대응책 등의 정보를 제공해야한다. 다섯째, 내란과 분쟁지역에서 NEO는 시·공간 제한사항이 많은 원거리 해외지역에서 작전이기 때문에 동맹국·우방국과의 긴밀한 군사협력 및 연합작전도 필수적이다.