RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    발생액의 구성요소가 조세회피와 기업가치의 관계에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Impact of Accrual Components on the Relationship between Tax Avoidance and Firm Value

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13969033

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigates whether corporate tax sheltering activities(or tax avoidance) affect firm value and accrual components affect the relationship between corporate tax sheltering activities and firm value.
    The traditional view of corporate tax sheltering activities suggests that firm value should increase with tax sheltering activities because it reduces transfer of resources from shareholders to the government. However, a recent trend of study on the corporate tax sheltering activities, from the agency perspective, suggests that firm value should decrease with tax sheltering activities because management may exploit tax avoidance to camouflage rent extraction.
    Prior literature that analyzes the relationship between tax avoidance and firm value has used a residual from a regression of total book-tax difference(BTD) on total accruals(TA) to estimate a measure of tax sheltering activities(TS) developed by Desai and Dharmapala(2006). However, a measure of tax sheltering activities(TS) developed by Desai and Dharmapala(2006) can not explain the corporate tax sheltering activities using discretionary accounting accrual components. Though income tax provisions for income and expense recognition can differ from financial reporting requirements, in many cases they are sufficiently similar so that items of income and expense are recognized in the same period for both tax and financial reporting purposes(Guenther et al. 1997).
    Accounting accruals are composed of both nondiscretionary and discretionary components. In prior accounting research, discretionary accruals are proxies for earnings quality especially from the financial accounting perspective. However, accounting accruals are not only used to manage book income but also used to manage taxable income. Calegari(2000) disaggregated discretionary accrual into two components from the tax planning perspective. One is discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC), and the other is discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA). Discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) are discretionary accruals that highly correlated with tax reporting requirements and discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA) are discretionary accruals with relatively lower book-tax conformity than discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(Calegari 2000).
    Firms using discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA) are able to reduce taxable income without reducing book income(financial statement income). However, firms using discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) will simultaneously reduce both their book income and taxable income. When firms use discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC), they faces a trade-off between financial reporting and tax planning. Financial reporting costs(or capital market pressure) are non-tax costs, such as the perceived negative stock market consequences associated with reductions in reported earnings(Klassen 1997). These accrual components may affect the relationship between corporate tax sheltering activities and firm value. In this study, I investigate the impact of accrual components-discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) and discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA)- on the relationship between a measure of tax sheltering activities(TS) developed by Desai and Dharmapala(2006) and firm value.
    In this paper, I analyze 2,507 non-financial and December year-end firm/year observations listed in the Korean KOSPI market during 2001 and 2010. Tax avoidance is measured using the difference between book income and taxable income not attributable to accounting accruals(Desai and Dharmapala 2006). Firm value is measured using Tobin’s Q(TQ). Accrual components are measured using discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) and discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA) suggested by Calegari(2000). I use interaction between corporate tax sheltering activities(TS) and accrual components(DBTC or DBOA) to examine how accrual components affect the relationship between tax avoidance and firm value.
    I find following empirical results. First, there is a significant negative relation between discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) and tax sheltering activities(TS) and a significant positive relation between discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA) and tax sheltering activities(TS). Second, there is a significant negative relation between discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) and discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA). Third, corporate tax sheltering activities(TS) have a significant negative effect on corporate firm value(TQ). Fourth, DBTCD(dummy variable that equals one if DBTC has a negative value(-); and zero otherwise) has a significant negative effect on corporate firm value(TQ) and DBOAD(dummy variable that equals one if DBOA has a positive value(+); and zero otherwise) has a significant positive effect on corporate firm value(TQ). Fifth, GD1(dummy variable that equals one if DBTC and DBOA has a positive value(+); and zero otherwise) has a significant positive effect on corporate firm value(TQ) and GD3(dummy variable that equals one if DBTC and DBOA has a negative value(-); and zero otherwise) has a significant negative effect on corporate firm value(TQ). Sixth, there is no significant relation between GD2(dummy variable that equals one if DBTC has a negative value(-) and DBOA has a positive value(+); and zero otherwise) and corporate firm value(TQ), and between GD4(dummy variable that equals one if DBTC has a positive value(+) and DBOA has a negative value(-); and zero otherwise) and corporate firm value(TQ).
    These results suggest that accrual components(DBTC or DBOA) play an important role in determining the relationship between corporate tax sheltering activities and firm value. This paper contributes to the literature by examining the impact of accrual components(DBTC or DBOA) on the relationship between corporate tax sheltering activities and firm value. These findings would provide valuable insights to companies, taxing authorities, regulators, investors, and other interested users.
    번역하기

    This study investigates whether corporate tax sheltering activities(or tax avoidance) affect firm value and accrual components affect the relationship between corporate tax sheltering activities and firm value. The traditional view of corporate tax...

    This study investigates whether corporate tax sheltering activities(or tax avoidance) affect firm value and accrual components affect the relationship between corporate tax sheltering activities and firm value.
    The traditional view of corporate tax sheltering activities suggests that firm value should increase with tax sheltering activities because it reduces transfer of resources from shareholders to the government. However, a recent trend of study on the corporate tax sheltering activities, from the agency perspective, suggests that firm value should decrease with tax sheltering activities because management may exploit tax avoidance to camouflage rent extraction.
    Prior literature that analyzes the relationship between tax avoidance and firm value has used a residual from a regression of total book-tax difference(BTD) on total accruals(TA) to estimate a measure of tax sheltering activities(TS) developed by Desai and Dharmapala(2006). However, a measure of tax sheltering activities(TS) developed by Desai and Dharmapala(2006) can not explain the corporate tax sheltering activities using discretionary accounting accrual components. Though income tax provisions for income and expense recognition can differ from financial reporting requirements, in many cases they are sufficiently similar so that items of income and expense are recognized in the same period for both tax and financial reporting purposes(Guenther et al. 1997).
    Accounting accruals are composed of both nondiscretionary and discretionary components. In prior accounting research, discretionary accruals are proxies for earnings quality especially from the financial accounting perspective. However, accounting accruals are not only used to manage book income but also used to manage taxable income. Calegari(2000) disaggregated discretionary accrual into two components from the tax planning perspective. One is discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC), and the other is discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA). Discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) are discretionary accruals that highly correlated with tax reporting requirements and discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA) are discretionary accruals with relatively lower book-tax conformity than discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(Calegari 2000).
    Firms using discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA) are able to reduce taxable income without reducing book income(financial statement income). However, firms using discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) will simultaneously reduce both their book income and taxable income. When firms use discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC), they faces a trade-off between financial reporting and tax planning. Financial reporting costs(or capital market pressure) are non-tax costs, such as the perceived negative stock market consequences associated with reductions in reported earnings(Klassen 1997). These accrual components may affect the relationship between corporate tax sheltering activities and firm value. In this study, I investigate the impact of accrual components-discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) and discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA)- on the relationship between a measure of tax sheltering activities(TS) developed by Desai and Dharmapala(2006) and firm value.
    In this paper, I analyze 2,507 non-financial and December year-end firm/year observations listed in the Korean KOSPI market during 2001 and 2010. Tax avoidance is measured using the difference between book income and taxable income not attributable to accounting accruals(Desai and Dharmapala 2006). Firm value is measured using Tobin’s Q(TQ). Accrual components are measured using discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) and discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA) suggested by Calegari(2000). I use interaction between corporate tax sheltering activities(TS) and accrual components(DBTC or DBOA) to examine how accrual components affect the relationship between tax avoidance and firm value.
    I find following empirical results. First, there is a significant negative relation between discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) and tax sheltering activities(TS) and a significant positive relation between discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA) and tax sheltering activities(TS). Second, there is a significant negative relation between discretionary book-tax conformity accruals(DBTC) and discretionary book-only accruals(DBOA). Third, corporate tax sheltering activities(TS) have a significant negative effect on corporate firm value(TQ). Fourth, DBTCD(dummy variable that equals one if DBTC has a negative value(-); and zero otherwise) has a significant negative effect on corporate firm value(TQ) and DBOAD(dummy variable that equals one if DBOA has a positive value(+); and zero otherwise) has a significant positive effect on corporate firm value(TQ). Fifth, GD1(dummy variable that equals one if DBTC and DBOA has a positive value(+); and zero otherwise) has a significant positive effect on corporate firm value(TQ) and GD3(dummy variable that equals one if DBTC and DBOA has a negative value(-); and zero otherwise) has a significant negative effect on corporate firm value(TQ). Sixth, there is no significant relation between GD2(dummy variable that equals one if DBTC has a negative value(-) and DBOA has a positive value(+); and zero otherwise) and corporate firm value(TQ), and between GD4(dummy variable that equals one if DBTC has a positive value(+) and DBOA has a negative value(-); and zero otherwise) and corporate firm value(TQ).
    These results suggest that accrual components(DBTC or DBOA) play an important role in determining the relationship between corporate tax sheltering activities and firm value. This paper contributes to the literature by examining the impact of accrual components(DBTC or DBOA) on the relationship between corporate tax sheltering activities and firm value. These findings would provide valuable insights to companies, taxing authorities, regulators, investors, and other interested users.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서 론 1
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 및 선행연구 8
    • 제1절 이론적 배경 8
    • 1. 조세회피와 기업가치의 관계 8
    • 제1장 서 론 1
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 및 선행연구 8
    • 제1절 이론적 배경 8
    • 1. 조세회피와 기업가치의 관계 8
    • 2. Desai and Dharmapala(2006) 조세회피 측정치의 문제점 10
    • 3. 비세무조정발생액(BTC)과 세무조정발생액(BOA) 13
    • 4. 조세비용과 비조세비용 17
    • 제2절 선행연구 20
    • 1. 조세회피와 기업가치에 대한 선행연구 20
    • 2. 세무조정발생액과 비세무조정발생액 관련 연구 27
    • 제3장 가설의 설정 30
    • 제4장 연구설계 36
    • 제1절 연구모형 36
    • 1. 가설 1에 대한 연구모형 36
    • 2. 가설 2에 대한 연구모형 37
    • 3. 가설 3에 대한 연구모형 38
    • 4. 가설 4에 대한 연구모형 40
    • 5. 가설 5와 가설 6에 대한 연구모형 41
    • 제2절 변수의 측정 43
    • 1. 재량적 비세무조정발생액과 재량적 세무조정발생액 43
    • 2. 조세회피(TS)의 측정 48
    • 3. 기업가치의 측정 50
    • 4. 통제변수 51
    • 제3절 표본의 선정 64
    • 제5장 실증 분석 결과 67
    • 제1절 기술통계량 67
    • 제2절 상관관계분석 71
    • 제3절 가설 검증 결과 73
    • 1. 가설 1에 대한 회귀분석 결과 73
    • 2. 가설 2에 대한 회귀분석 결과 75
    • 3. 가설 3에 대한 회귀분석 결과 78
    • 4. 가설 4에 대한 회귀분석 결과 80
    • 5. 가설 5와 가설 6에 대한 회귀분석 결과 83
    • 제4절 강건성 검증 88
    • 1. 가설 1의 모형에 두 변수를 동시에 투입한 경우 88
    • 2. 가설 4의 모형에 두 변수를 동시에 투입한 경우 90
    • 3. 가설 5와 가설 6의 그룹 구분기준의 다양화 92
    • 제6장 결론 111
    • 참 고 문 헌 114
    • ABSTRACT 121
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. 조세회피와 소유구조, 김영철, 강정연, 한국세무학회, 세무학연구 제29권 제2호: 37-67, , 2012

    2. “감사인 특성과 조세회피”, 박미영, 한국세무학회, 세무와회계저널 제13권 제3호: 191-219, , 2012

    3. “감사노력과 기업의 조세회피”, 박한순, 정균채, 이종필, 회계연구 제18 권 제1호: 227-249, , 2103

    4. “기업지배구조와 조세회피의 관계”, 서정록, 최동춘, 대한회계학회, 회계연구 제18권 제 1호: 1-27, , 2013

    5. 기업가치와 기업소유구조와의 관련성, 이재춘, 김영숙, 한국증권학회, 증권학회지 제 26집: 173-197, , 2000

    6. 「기업의 조세전략과 세무회계연구」제2판, 이준규, 김갑순, 영화조세통 람, , 2012

    7. 조세회피와 기업특성 및 기업가치에 관한 연구., 김지홍, 고윤성, 최원욱, 한국세무학회, 세무학연구 제24권 제4호: 9-40, , 2007

    8. 기업의 재무적 특성이 조세회피행위에 미치는 영향, 김진회(Kim Jin Hoe), 정재욱, 한국세무학회, 세무학연구 제23권 제4 호: 97-123, , 2006

    9. “조세회피와 감사품질과 타인자본비용의 관련성”, 김은주, 조용언, 한국국제회계학회, 국제 회계연구 제44집: 279-300, , 2012

    10. 조세회피와 기업가치: 지배구조의 역할을 중심으로., 전주성, 한국재정학회, 재정학연 구 제4권 제4호: 59-85, , 2011

    11. “한계세율과 과세소득과 관련된 회계선택과의 관계”, 정석우, 오광욱, 한국세무학회, 세 무학연구 제17권 제4호: 43-79, , 2010

    12. 감사품질과 이익의 질 및 기업가치에 관한 실증적 연구, 최정호, 이정우, 韓國公認會計士會, 회계와 감사연구 제48호: 109-144, , 2008

    13. 발생액의 세무적 분해를 통한 이익관리수단에 관한 연구, 서승철(Seung Cheol Seo), 윤순석(Soon Suk Yoon), 한국회계학회, 회계학연구 제36권 제4호: 249-283, , 2011

    14. 기업지배구조가 조세회피와 기업가치의 관계에 미치는 영향, 고종권 ( Jong Kwon Ko ), 강정연 ( Jeong Yeon Kang ), 한국회계학회, 회계학연구 제39권 제1호: 147-183, , 2014

    15. “발생액 구성요소가 회계이익과 세무이익의 정 보효과에 미치는 영향”, 이현아, 최원욱, 이재홍, 한국회계학회, 회계학연구 제38권 4호: 297-332, , 2013

    16. 기업의 사회적 책임활동이 조세회피 및 조세회피에 대한 시장반응에 미치는 영향, 기은선, 한국세무학회, 세무학연구 제29권 제2호: 107-136, , 2012

    17. “기업지배구조가 조세절감활동과 기업가치의 관련성에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구”, 김갑순, 이상철, 양동훈, 손언승, 한국세무학회, 세무와회계저널 제13권 제3호: 385-419, , 2012

    18. “세금비용과 비세금비용이 재무보고이익과 세무보고이익의 차이 에 미치는 영향”, 고종권, 한국회계학회, 회계학연구 제28권 제2호, 한국회계학회, , 2003

    19. 감사위원회와 감사인의 세무서비스가 조세회피행위를 통하여 기업가치에 미치는 영향, 박재환, 김승준, 한국회계학회, 회계저널 제21권 제3호: 253-283, , 2012

    20. “세무조정자료의 분석을 통해 살펴본 우리나라 기업의 재무이익과 세무이익의 차이”, 노희천, 김갑순, 정운오, 고종권, 한국회계학회, 회계학연구 제31권 제4호, 한국회계학회: 203-238, , 2006

    21. “조세비용과 비조세비용의 상충관계가 재무보고이익과 세무보고 이익의 차이가 미치는 영향”, 전규안, 회계학연구 제20권 제1호, 한국회계학 회, , 2004

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼