RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재 SCOPUS

    발생액의 세무적 분해를 통한 이익관리수단에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Earnings Management Vehicles through Tax Decomposition of Accruals

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigates 1,422 firm-year observations during the period from 1999 to 2007 to identify the vehicles that Korean firms use when they manage earnings with tax savings in mind. We decompose accruals from the perspective of tax savings to examine which components of accruals are used as the primary tools of earnings management. Accounting earnings can be divided into cash flows from operations and total accruals. Total accruals, in turn, are divided into accruals without current period tax implications and accruals with tax implications. We partition the sample into two sub-samples based on discretionary accruals in order to distinguish income-increasing firms from income-decreasing firms. We also partition the sample into two sub-samples based on discretionary accruals with tax implications in order to distinguish taxable-income-increasing firms from taxable-income-decreasing firms. The low discretionary accrual firms are defined as income-decreasing firms while the high discretionary accrual firms are considered income-increasing firms. Firms that reduce discretionary accruals with current period tax implications are defined as taxable-income-decreasing firms while firms that increase them are considered taxable-income-increasing firms. This paper uses discretionary accruals and discretionary accruals with current period tax implications as the proxies for earnings management and taxable income management. Discretionary accruals with current period tax implications are estimated using the modified Jones model (1995). Then, we examine if earnings management vehicles follow some particular patterns depending upon the extent of earnings management and taxable income management. To identify the particular patterns of earnings management vehicles, we use mean difference tests and regression analyses. The empirical results of this study reveal that there are clear differences between the employment of vehicles for earnings management and the employment of vehicles for taxable income management. We document that accruals without current period tax implications are offset by the use of discretionary accruals with current period tax implications. Also the empirical results of the study reveal that there are clear differences between taxable-income-increasing firms and taxable-income-decreasing firms in the employment of earnings management vehicles. More specifically, we document that taxableincome- decreasing firms depend heavily on accruals without current period tax implications because of the tradeoff between tax costs and non-tax costs when the firms increase reported earnings.
    번역하기

    This study investigates 1,422 firm-year observations during the period from 1999 to 2007 to identify the vehicles that Korean firms use when they manage earnings with tax savings in mind. We decompose accruals from the perspective of tax savings to ex...

    This study investigates 1,422 firm-year observations during the period from 1999 to 2007 to identify the vehicles that Korean firms use when they manage earnings with tax savings in mind. We decompose accruals from the perspective of tax savings to examine which components of accruals are used as the primary tools of earnings management. Accounting earnings can be divided into cash flows from operations and total accruals. Total accruals, in turn, are divided into accruals without current period tax implications and accruals with tax implications. We partition the sample into two sub-samples based on discretionary accruals in order to distinguish income-increasing firms from income-decreasing firms. We also partition the sample into two sub-samples based on discretionary accruals with tax implications in order to distinguish taxable-income-increasing firms from taxable-income-decreasing firms. The low discretionary accrual firms are defined as income-decreasing firms while the high discretionary accrual firms are considered income-increasing firms. Firms that reduce discretionary accruals with current period tax implications are defined as taxable-income-decreasing firms while firms that increase them are considered taxable-income-increasing firms. This paper uses discretionary accruals and discretionary accruals with current period tax implications as the proxies for earnings management and taxable income management. Discretionary accruals with current period tax implications are estimated using the modified Jones model (1995). Then, we examine if earnings management vehicles follow some particular patterns depending upon the extent of earnings management and taxable income management. To identify the particular patterns of earnings management vehicles, we use mean difference tests and regression analyses. The empirical results of this study reveal that there are clear differences between the employment of vehicles for earnings management and the employment of vehicles for taxable income management. We document that accruals without current period tax implications are offset by the use of discretionary accruals with current period tax implications. Also the empirical results of the study reveal that there are clear differences between taxable-income-increasing firms and taxable-income-decreasing firms in the employment of earnings management vehicles. More specifically, we document that taxableincome- decreasing firms depend heavily on accruals without current period tax implications because of the tradeoff between tax costs and non-tax costs when the firms increase reported earnings.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.96 1.96 2.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.74 5.829 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼